Foxx Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1186485663996301312 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 On October 19, 2019 at 3:28 PM, Deranged Rhino said: Just finishing the Times article -- and there's a lot of wrong information in there (Durham has subpoena power as an example, and I'm 90% certain they've spoken to several Langley folk already but I have no way to confirm that). It seems like an attempt to get ahead of Durham's report. That implies to me that we're going to see something more than just scathing from Barr/Durham. But that's the million dollar question. There is a lot of chatter that the fear is no DC GJ would indict anyone on the left side of the aisle... which is why Huber has had three GJ's empaneled outside of DC. I'm still in the camp expecting charges to be brought against multiple people, starting with McCabe and Strzok -- likely reaching up to Comey and Yates with some middle men in between. We'll get the Horowitz report first, but Horowitz does not have the power to indict only refer people for indictments. That should be the canary in the coal mine so to speak. If Horowitz comes out with a report as thick as a telephone book but it's majorly redacted and lacks any referrals for criminal prosecutions -- then we are in a bit of trouble. If it's lightly redacted and there are a few referrals -- it shows we're on track for Durham to really bring the heat. I stand by what I've always said about not predicting a precise date -- but my spidey sense is tingling that we'll get the OIG report this coming week. Total guess on my part, not a prediction. The sun'll come out tomorrow, so you gotta hang on till tomorrow.....I love ya tomorrow, you're always a day away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 The prosecutor conducting the review, Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, has expressed his intent to interview a number of current and former intelligence officials involved in examining Russia's effort to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, including former CIA Director John Brennan and former director of national intelligence James Clapper, Brennan told NBC News. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: The prosecutor conducting the review, Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, has expressed his intent to interview a number of current and former intelligence officials involved in examining Russia's effort to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, including former CIA Director John Brennan and former director of national intelligence James Clapper, Brennan told NBC News. They've known all of this for multiple years. A lot of it is in the public domain. They've done nothing with it and will do nothing. "Something significant" is big enough and vague enough for this whole charade. And it's a charade. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 9 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: They've known all of this for multiple years. A lot of it is in the public domain. They've done nothing with it and will do nothing. "Something significant" is big enough and vague enough for this whole charade. And it's a charade. Due process, real due process not ginned up fraudulent investigations, takes time. Especially when it comes to spooky matters, most of which can't be adjudicated in the light of day. No one is expecting Brennan to end up on a witness chair during a trial. Same with Clapper. Can't be done cleanly. Instead they'll likely have... fishing or hunting accidents, or just "vanish. But only after they give sworn depositions/statements to the investigators. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 Now this is spin... Remember who she is and who she represents and this kind of deflections makes more sense. Thread w analysis on the article above: 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/BreakingNLive/status/1186733639960354817 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 24 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://mobile.twitter.com/BreakingNLive/status/1186733639960354817 Maybe a plea deal will be in the works. Brennan avoids the firing squad but gets the next 50 years in prison with good strong sheets capable of holding up a very fully grown man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 ....so when the report comes out and NOT to their liking, this little tidbit gets overlooked......shall we say "partisan hack label" for starters??............ "In August 2009, Attorney General Eric Holder appointed Durham to lead the Justice Department's investigation of the legality of CIA's use of so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" in the torture of detainees." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 23, 2019 Share Posted October 23, 2019 Laws against seditious conspiracy have real legal teeth by Ed Timperlake Original Article News flash for all Deep State conspirators: we have a lawfully elected President who is at the top of the Executive Branch of US Government. As such, President Trump represents one third of our constitutionally empowered leadership and is “the US Government.” That reality has proven to be an issue for a lot of Deep State players inside the US Government, who from day one of his election or even earlier could not accept the will of their fellow citizens. Sadly, rather than focusing on changing administrations in our four-year cycle of peaceful revolution at the ballot box, many have engaged in violating the law through a conspiracy . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 23, 2019 Share Posted October 23, 2019 Barr is part of the criminal cinspiracy in Ukraine. Barr's justice department allowed Epstien to suicide himself. Barr is a fraud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 23, 2019 Share Posted October 23, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/mizdonna/status/1187063332462825473 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted October 23, 2019 Share Posted October 23, 2019 There's no doubt that Brennan ordered the code red. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted October 23, 2019 Share Posted October 23, 2019 There has been quite the dog-piling onto Lindsey Graham the past couple of days, especially by members of the Right (Tucker Carlson, Rand Paul, Sebastian Gorka, to name a few). The video of him getting rewarded a medal from Poroshenko in Ukraine has been floating around (which @Buffalo_Gal posted within the Ukraine thread): And Susan Rice got in on the action calling him a piece of schiff. The timing of all of this seems odd to me. Why is this happening now, from numerous places, so close to when the Horowitz report is made public? I can't help but think Lindsey is going to have a large part to play in the next few months. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 23, 2019 Share Posted October 23, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Hedge said: ... The timing of all of this seems odd to me. Why is this happening now, from numerous places, so close to when the Horowitz report is made public? I can't help but think Lindsey is going to have a large part to play in the next few months. would that be the role/roll of the Trojan Horse? Edited October 23, 2019 by Foxx 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 23, 2019 Share Posted October 23, 2019 24 minutes ago, Foxx said: would that be the role/roll of the Trojan Horse? This is the fear. He was always controlled by no name — the logic was once he was dead that would stop. Maybe it has, maybe not. But so far he’s been unimpressive. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 23, 2019 Share Posted October 23, 2019 27 minutes ago, Foxx said: would that be the role/roll of the Trojan Horse? ...think what could have been PREVENTED.....just sayin'................ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted October 24, 2019 Share Posted October 24, 2019 Surprise! More delays. Hannity says November for the FISA report. "Eventually we need to get to the truth. Now I’m told the first week of November. I guess I shouldn’t hold my breath." These 2 are worth the few minutes, as well, especially the clip with Solomon. 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 24, 2019 Share Posted October 24, 2019 Yup. (same article btw) 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts