Jump to content

Operation Boomerang AG Barr's Investigation of Acts of Treason by Federal Employees


Recommended Posts

Anybody who has an inner connection to Washington know that Barr, Horowitz and Durham will have damning evidence against the dirty Dems, but..............

 

We also know not a damn thing will be done to them because Republicans are as spineless as Democrats are dirty.

 

The President is going to have to use all his Presidential powers to bring these people to justice. The Republicans will do NOTHING about it themselves.

 

The Democrats want you to think that Independents and people who hold no political party are as stupid as they are.

 

Like I said, if you know somebody in Washington, you really know what is going on and what isn't going to be done about its

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, njbuff said:

Anybody who has an inner connection to Washington know that Barr, Horowitz and Durham will have damning evidence against the dirty Dems, but..............

 

We also know not a damn thing will be done to them because Republicans are as spineless as Democrats are dirty.

 

The President is going to have to use all his Presidential powers to bring these people to justice. The Republicans will do NOTHING about it themselves.

 

The Democrats want you to think that Independents and people who hold no political party are as stupid as they are.

 

Like I said, if you know somebody in Washington, you really know what is going on and what isn't going to be done about its

They've got evidence on corrupt individual cronies on both sides that have thrived off of faking outrage about issues, but not doing anything about it so they can leverage it for another election cycle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

John Brennan redefines presumption of innocence for our new age of never-ending partisan witch hunts by the Democrat Party–liberal media axis of evil:

“People are innocent until alleged to be involved in some type of criminal activity.”

He issued his redefinition on MSNBC, of course:

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

John Brennan redefines presumption of innocence for our new age of never-ending partisan witch hunts by the Democrat Party–liberal media axis of evil:

“People are innocent until alleged to be involved in some type of criminal activity.”

He issued his redefinition on MSNBC, of course:

 

 

 

 

When the enemies of this country, and John Brennan is exactly that, tell you who they are... believe them. 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not mind control. Vault 7 release proved the CIA has had the tools to hack cars for years

 

https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/?

 

Think it was an accident Assange released Vault 7 which just happened to include the proof that CIA can spoof forensic data on hacks (making US attacks look like they came from Russia) and outted their ability to hack vehicles? Nah. It was a direct shot at Brennan for Hastings and the coup. 

 

*****************

 

Speaking of the coup -- the CYA continues by the guilty parties:

 

4 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

No, that was Clapper. Keep up, nimrod.

 

Speaking of: 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

What? CrowdStrike just said that they were non-partisan! Are they seriously pouncing by accusing someone on the left, without evidence, of lying?!?

 

What's next, you gonna tell us that CNN, WaPO, and the NYT publishes provably false/misleading information in their stories?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Quote

John Durham, the U.S. attorney reviewing the origins of the 2016 counterintelligence investigation into Russia and the Trump campaign, is probing a wider timeline than previously known, according to multiple senior administration officials.

Fox News previously reported that Durham would be reviewing the days leading up to the 2016 election and through the inauguration.

However, based on what he has been finding, Durham has expanded his investigation adding agents and resources, the senior administration officials said. The timeline has grown from the beginning of the probe through the election and now has included a post-election timeline through the spring of 2017, up to when Robert Mueller was named special counsel.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't stress enough how much of this is kabuki theater... 

 

 

Durham's team expanded before he went overseas based on what Huber/Horowitz already found and logged (from people on those teams). 

Durham's investigation started with much of the legwork already done, thanks to Huber's year long work which paralleled Mueller's probe. 

Durham, when appointed, has been going through their work (double checking/confirming) rather than doing new investigative work. 

Three GJ's have been empaneled during the "dead" time, all three outside of DC (not sure their current status)

 

They're launching these stories now on a schedule designed for maximum political impact due to the impeachment push. More will be coming, and expect the OIG report the week of the 21st (I would guess towards the end of that week). I HATE guessing dates, but that's the window I've been told by multiple people now to expect it. 

 

Time will tell. But things are about to get REAL.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

All I can say is more is coming. A lot more. The whole national narrative will look wildly different in a few weeks. 

 

 

 

How?  Are CNN/WaPo/NYT no longer going to be setting it?

 

Keeping in mind: the narrative they've already set is "Trump is using the authority of the Executive Branch to persecute political opponents."  Nothing that can conceivably be released can change that - in fact, anything that would change the national narrative actually reinforces the current narrative.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

How?  Are CNN/WaPo/NYT no longer going to be setting it?

 

Keeping in mind: the narrative they've already set is "Trump is using the authority of the Executive Branch to persecute political opponents."  Nothing that can conceivably be released can change that - in fact, anything that would change the national narrative actually reinforces the current narrative.

 

The calculation apparently all along was that once the facts start coming out, the narrative would change, not that they would dig in their prior positions.  

 

How's that theory working out?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...