Deranged Rhino Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 1 minute ago, Hedge said: I've been chewing on this (because that is my #1 concern right now) and was wondering if you are able to share why time is no longer a factor. Is it because what will come out will be so egregious? Correct. There is a confidence that they can make actual cases that will stick even in the face of the inevitable spin/push back. And now even more people within the FBI/DOJ are coming forward with new testimony/evidence (apparently). For example, it was reported last week that Strzok had been back in the FBI offices on Wray's invite -- in reality, he was being questioned by US attorneys. But the spin (on the right/never-trumpers) initially was that Wray had forgiven/re-hired/restored Strzok's access. It's going to require two terms to clean up -- but I still hold that they must do something disclosure/prosecution wise before 2020 to secure that second term, hence my concern. But what do I know? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: There is a confidence that they can make actual cases that will stick even in the face of the inevitable spin/push back. That's good to hear, especially since there is a school of thought out there, that the laws that govern the IC are so grey that it will be hard to successfully prosecute those who will claim that they acted out of fear for, and love of, our country. I'm not so worried about the spin and push back (which are expected and have been ongoing for years), as this will be settled in a court of law once charges are rolled out. 17 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's going to require two terms to clean up I will be surprised if that is all actually, given that these cases will require months of defense prep, months of trials, then years to get through the appeals processes. If President Trump doesn't win a second term (which I think is highly unlikely at this point in time), or if he does win, but whomever follows him into the Oval Office is compromised, then Pardons rain down. I think we may have to go *there* with the deepest, darkest, most disgusting corners being exposed to the public to avoid the culprits going free at some point, because if that gets revealed the blow back from issuing pardons would be extreme. 12 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: But what do I know? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 11 hours ago, Hedge said: I've been chewing on this (because that is my #1 concern right now) and was wondering if you are able to share why time is no longer a factor. Because...time-travel. Time traveling clones. That's how Cohen simultaneously was in Prague and the US. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted August 8, 2019 Share Posted August 8, 2019 Going to drop this here, as there may be some Obama dirt that eventually comes out of this. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 8, 2019 Share Posted August 8, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted August 8, 2019 Share Posted August 8, 2019 On 8/7/2019 at 1:31 AM, Deranged Rhino said: Correct. There is a confidence that they can make actual cases that will stick even in the face of the inevitable spin/push back. And now even more people within the FBI/DOJ are coming forward with new testimony/evidence (apparently). For example, it was reported last week that Strzok had been back in the FBI offices on Wray's invite -- in reality, he was being questioned by US attorneys. But the spin (on the right/never-trumpers) initially was that Wray had forgiven/re-hired/restored Strzok's access. It's going to require two terms to clean up -- but I still hold that they must do something disclosure/prosecution wise before 2020 to secure that second term, hence my concern. But what do I know? ...sounds reasonable but AG Barr will have to pick his disclosure spots wisely......if he had something now and was to disclose, he'd be trashed in a nanosecond for attempting to deter attention from Trump with recent events..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 8, 2019 Share Posted August 8, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 8, 2019 Share Posted August 8, 2019 Bruce Ohr's 302 is out -- haven't found it yet (am at work) but excerpts are dribbling out: *(*(*(*(*(*(*(*(*(*(*(** Annnnnnnnd this is good news. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Bruce Ohr's 302 is out https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/JW-v-DOJ-Ohr-302s-02107.pdf 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Hmmm... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: Hmmm... Says it all, doesn't it -- especially considering how wrong (intentionally/knowingly) she's been on Trump/Russia. Almost like she -- like Gordon -- is a Brennan acolyte. It's not accidental that Ohr's 302 (which I'm still going through but are damning confirmations of almost everything laid out re the coup) were finally released on the same day which Trump asked Gordon to leave her post. I also don't think it's an accident the incoming acting director retired in 2010 -- two years into 44's term. If people don't remember, a number of 1-2 star level military personnel quit/retired due to (but most without saying so publicly) their unwillingness to kiss the ring/go along with the stripped back ROE's and defense policies. (This isn't an accident in terms of timing either) 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 10 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Says it all, doesn't it -- especially considering how wrong (intentionally/knowingly) she's been on Trump/Russia. Almost like she -- like Gordon -- is a Brennan acolyte. "Silicon Valley" is what really caught my eye. Cyber-dezinformatsiya is a big component of the coup. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 A few takes on the 302s: Long thread. Here it is unrolled: 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 Brian and Tracy do good work above... The cluster of dates of the 302s is REALLY important to note: immediately after the election, immediately after the inauguration, then right before the SCO was appointed. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted August 9, 2019 Author Share Posted August 9, 2019 Steele didn't write the dossier. Nellie Ohr did. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 1 minute ago, Nanker said: Steele didn't write the dossier. Nellie Ohr did. (If only several people had made that point on these very forums two years ago ) 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 Yup. FISA on Page is going to be exposed as fraudulent ... and what happens next? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 9, 2019 Share Posted August 9, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts