Jump to content

Operation Boomerang AG Barr's Investigation of Acts of Treason by Federal Employees


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Chris farley said:

????????desperately attampting to muddy the waters.?????

 

Hannity coined the term "Operation Boomerang"

 

Mark Meadows knows what's up

 

Sara Carter is the best investigatory journalist in the land sans TracyBeanz

 

#DaysNotWeeks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, McGee Return TD said:

 

Hannity coined the term "Operation Boomerang"

 

Mark Meadows knows what's up

 

Sara Carter is the best investigatory journalist in the land sans TracyBeanz

 

#DaysNotWeeks

its operation crossfire boomerang.  to reference the high crimes that took place in "operation crossfire hurricane"

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chris farley said:

its operation crossfire boomerang.  to reference the high crimes that took place in "operation crossfire hurricane"

 

:beer: He keeps proving he's not worth the effort or time. 

 

He's ignored the evidence for two + years that it's been shared down here -- not speculations or op-eds, actual verifiable evidence of serious (criminal) abuse of our surveillance systems and courts. Now that it's coming out, his strategy is to make fun of the reporters who have been right from the beginning, despite the cacophony of NPC programmed lemmings screaming "BUT RUSSIA!!!!"

 

He's not a serious person. He's not interested in having a discussion. He just wants to troll from his (many) accounts because it makes him feel better about himself. 

 

It''d be funny if it weren't so darned sad. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are
presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new
evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is
extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it
is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize,
ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief.”

Frantz Fanon

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

“Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are
presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new
evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is
extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it
is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize,
ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief.”

Frantz Fanon

 

 

That fits several people here.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chris farley said:

“Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are
presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new
evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is
extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it
is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize,
ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief.”

Frantz Fanon

 

 

 

Yeah well, ***** you! The Bills WILL win it all this year, if the refs don't ***** them out of wins again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chris farley said:

“Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are
presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new
evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is
extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it
is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize,
ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief.”

Frantz Fanon

 

 

 

Fanon.....  :D

 

too bad we can't ask him now to dictate what truth and proof is.....  LOL

 

 

or advocate the murder of everyone in his way

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...