Deranged Rhino Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 28 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Trump going the EP to hide the Mueller report! How can they go after the investigators if no one can see the report??? Come on DR, the guy is complete scum. Everyone, including Congress can see the report. And have been able to for weeks. This whole thing is nonsense. It's fear and projection by the committee members who know their goose is cooked. They ***** up and committed treason/sedition against each and every one of us on this board. If there was real justice we'd bring back hangings in the town square -- but I'll settle for what's coming instead. 3
Tiberius Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 18 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Everyone, including Congress can see the report. And have been able to for weeks. This whole thing is nonsense. It's fear and projection by the committee members who know their goose is cooked. They ***** up and committed treason/sedition against each and every one of us on this board. If there was real justice we'd bring back hangings in the town square -- but I'll settle for what's coming instead. Why is Trump whataboutisming about this??? I thought he had been cleared? LOL, he is trying to bury the report. Why? Guilty?
Deranged Rhino Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Why is Trump whataboutisming about this??? I thought he had been cleared? LOL, he is trying to bury the report. Why? Guilty? That's not whataboutism. That's where this investigation is going. Steele was a political actor, and his dossier was bunk. It's proven. Which means that the FBI/DOJ and Obama Administration perpetrated fruad on the FISC in order to spy on their political opponents -- and in so doing, paid RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE ASSETS for disinformation which they distributed wide to the public. You seem REALLY scared about Russia, isn't it concerning to you in the least that the Clinton Campaign and the Obama White House paid the Russians millions of dollars to sow disinformation? Or do your fears over Russia stop at your partisan line? Edited May 8, 2019 by Deranged Rhino 3
Tiberius Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: That's not whataboutism. That's where this investigation is going. Steele was a political actor, and his dossier was bunk. It's proven. Which means that the FBI/DOJ and Obama Administration perpetrated fruad on the FISC in order to spy on their political opponents -- and in so doing, paid RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE ASSETS for disinformation which they distributed wide to the public. You seem REALLY scared about Russia, isn't it concerning to you in the least that the Clinton Campaign and the Obama White House paid the Russians millions of dollars to sow disinformation? Or do your fears over Russia stop at your partisan line? I'm scared? Ummm....I'm not the one who doesn't want these people to testify. I'm not the one who doesn't want the report released. I'm not the one making up wahatboutisms Trump obviously accepted Russian help and the obstructed justice to hide that fact. That's why you are going nuts. ----- Nearly 700 prosecutors would open, not close, the case. “Hundreds of additional former federal prosecutors have signed onto a statement asserting that President Trump would have been indicted for obstruction of justice were he not currently serving as president. The open letter organized by the nonprofit group Protect Democracy had roughly 400 signatures when it was initially posted Monday afternoon on Medium. The letter neared 700 signatures as of Tuesday afternoon.” Wow.
Deranged Rhino Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: I'm scared? You have posted for three years that Russia is a threat for working with Trump to swing the election. The facts now show that didn't happen with Trump/Russia, but it DID happen with Clinton and Obama/Russia. Is that a problem for you, or do they get a pass because of their political party? It's a yes or no answer.
SoCal Deek Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 The 1970s called...they want their foreign policy back...what a tool!
BeginnersMind Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 (edited) Yesterday. Asked whether he was aware of evidence that the FBI had illegally spied on the Trump campaign, Chris Wray said, “I don’t think I personally have any evidence of that sort.” He’s one of your guys, isn’t he Deep State conspiracists? Edited May 8, 2019 by BeginnersMind 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 Remember this about Barr -- he came out of retirement for this job. It's his last job. He's immune to the political attacks because he does not give a F. At all. Trying to play the same dirty political games against them, as Nadler and the majority are doing, won't work. Barr gives zero schiffs. (posting for the video clip) 1 2
GG Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: Yesterday. Asked whether he was aware of evidence that the FBI had illegally spied on the Trump campaign, Chris Wray said, “I don’t think I personally have any evidence of that sort.” He’s one of your guys, isn’t he Deep State conspiracists? Let's say that you are versed as a lawyer... How many caveats can you spot in that response that answers your question? 2
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 3 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: Yesterday. Asked whether he was aware of evidence that the FBI had illegally spied on the Trump campaign, Chris Wray said, “I don’t think I personally have any evidence of that sort.” He’s one of your guys, isn’t he Deep State conspiracists? That was commented upon pages ago. The evidence has been turned over to the OIG. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, GG said: Let's say that you are versed as a lawyer... How many caveats can you spot in that response that answers your question? He's taking Wray out of context, because he didn't listen or read or watch the full exchange. Which just shows how ignorant Ben Franklin/BM is about what's happening, and how eager he is to suck the d of his "experts" and "authorities" to whom he gleefully defers. Wray's full comments are telling. More so that BM didn't post them. He's not a serious person. He does not think for himself -- which he keeps proving over and over again. Edited May 8, 2019 by Deranged Rhino
Deranged Rhino Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 Uh-oh... this is bad news for a lot of the people screaming on the majority side of the House Judiciary today... Horowitz has it all. Huber has it all. It's all going to come out, and it's going to be very bad for the narrative engineers and coup plotters. Their time is almost up -- and they know it. Hence the FEAR. (Ron Johnson is on TV now talking about how MI6 tipped the FBI to G-Pop -- if that's true, that would cause another rollback of the start date of Crossfire Hurricane -- and it's the first time a Senator has publicly called out the Brits) 5 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 Comey just got even more nervous. Expect a contemplative selfie of him in "nature" soon as a response. He's *****. 1
Koko78 Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I'm shocked that anyone would insinuate that a man who states he has a photographic memory, then testifies under oath that he can't remember things, would ever be dishonest! Edited May 8, 2019 by Koko78 1
Tiberius Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, Koko78 said: I'm shocked that anyone would insinuate that a man who states he has a photographic memory, then testifies under oath that he can't remember things, would ever be dishonest! Like Trump? He never testified.
Koko78 Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 When did Trump ever claim to have a photographic memory?
DC Tom Posted May 8, 2019 Posted May 8, 2019 10 minutes ago, Koko78 said: When did Trump ever claim to have a photographic memory? Don't know...but I wouldn't be surprised if he has. And really, he does...if the film is all fogged-up from exposure to x-rays or something.
Recommended Posts