Foxx Posted May 6, 2019 Posted May 6, 2019 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: Lol, he should be welcoming this chance, but he's not. Trump is scared. do you ever get tired of being wrong?
3rdnlng Posted May 6, 2019 Posted May 6, 2019 42 minutes ago, Foxx said: do you ever get tired of being wrong? Hell, being wrong puts him in his comfort zone.
Tiberius Posted May 7, 2019 Posted May 7, 2019 15 hours ago, Foxx said: Trump should welcome Mueller's testimony. You guys and Trump have been claiming the report clears that idiot, so what's all the fear about? Oh ya, it might confuse the lies Trump has told.
SoCal Deek Posted May 7, 2019 Posted May 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Trump should welcome Mueller's testimony. You guys and Trump have been claiming the report clears that idiot, so what's all the fear about? Oh ya, it might confuse the lies Trump has told. Mueller must be a horrible writer, or the Dems are really slow readers if they need the author to come in and explain his 400 page novel. Was the plot that difficult to follow? Did they need more pictures? Maybe a set of crayons?
Koko78 Posted May 7, 2019 Posted May 7, 2019 20 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Mueller must be a horrible writer, or the Dems are really slow readers if they need the author to come in and explain his 400 page novel. Was the plot that difficult to follow? Did they need more pictures? Maybe a set of crayons? The real problem, and the reason that the Democrats need Mueller to testify, is that there were no interactive pop-ups in his report.
row_33 Posted May 7, 2019 Posted May 7, 2019 37 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Mueller must be a horrible writer, or the Dems are really slow readers if they need the author to come in and explain his 400 page novel. Was the plot that difficult to follow? Did they need more pictures? Maybe a set of crayons? they are there to act like a two year old denied a cookie
Tiberius Posted May 7, 2019 Posted May 7, 2019 31 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Mueller must be a horrible writer, or the Dems are really slow readers if they need the author to come in and explain his 400 page novel. Was the plot that difficult to follow? Did they need more pictures? Maybe a set of crayons? A picture is worth a thousand words, right? Did you read the report?
B-Man Posted May 7, 2019 Posted May 7, 2019 Same old playbook.......... 1. We're totally innocent2. Mistakes were made3. You're damn right we did it and here's why <== YOU ARE HERE4. A Republican did something vaguely similar decades ago5. Why are obsessed conservatives still talking about this old news? . 1
Tiberius Posted May 7, 2019 Posted May 7, 2019 20 minutes ago, B-Man said: Same old playbook.......... 1. We're totally innocent2. Mistakes were made3. You're damn right we did it and here's why <== YOU ARE HERE4. A Republican did something vaguely similar decades ago5. Why are obsessed conservatives still talking about this old news? . He obstructed justice, accepted Russian interference and might still be. And your unAmerican Ass cares nothing about it. Shame on you
RochesterRob Posted May 7, 2019 Posted May 7, 2019 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: He obstructed justice, accepted Russian interference and might still be. And your unAmerican Ass cares nothing about it. Shame on you Just give it up already. Nobody is accepting your biased word anyhow. Tell us about the noon gruel that is served at the Soros Cubicle Farm to keep your mind compliant to your leftist masters.
row_33 Posted May 7, 2019 Posted May 7, 2019 22 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: Just give it up already. Nobody is accepting your biased word anyhow. Tell us about the noon gruel that is served at the Soros Cubicle Farm to keep your mind compliant to your leftist masters. we are only here to bearbait fools that think the 2016 election will be overturned actually they are more like a sad animal that would enjoy get poked by sticks
Wacka Posted May 7, 2019 Posted May 7, 2019 30 minutes ago, Tiberius said: He obstructed justice, accepted Russian interference and might still be. And your unAmerican Ass cares nothing about it. Shame on you No matter how many times you replay it, Norwood's kick will still be wide right by a foot ir two. 1 1
DC Tom Posted May 7, 2019 Posted May 7, 2019 36 minutes ago, Tiberius said: He obstructed justice, accepted Russian interference and might still be. And your unAmerican Ass cares nothing about it. Shame on you For what? He's the president of the United States. He's got the power of law enforcement, the military, the intelligence community, and the Treasury at his fingertips, plus a pen and a phone. What does he need Russian assistance for, borscht recipes? Those three words, "might still be," would illustrate the depths of your derangement, if you were paying attention to yourself: even if he had it before, Trump doesn't need any Russian assistance now. He perfectly capable of oppressing your sorry ass without Russian assistance. And you can still spew that nonsense. What would that mean to a normal, rational adult person? 1
Tiberius Posted May 7, 2019 Posted May 7, 2019 13 minutes ago, DC Tom said: For what? He's the president of the United States. He's got the power of law enforcement, the military, the intelligence community, and the Treasury at his fingertips, plus a pen and a phone. What does he need Russian assistance for, borscht recipes? Those three words, "might still be," would illustrate the depths of your derangement, if you were paying attention to yourself: even if he had it before, Trump doesn't need any Russian assistance now. He perfectly capable of oppressing your sorry ass without Russian assistance. And you can still spew that nonsense. What would that mean to a normal, rational adult person? To win in 2020. Anyone, like you, that thinks this criminal won't use the help of the criminal dictator...wait, no one would believe he wouldn't. You just don't care. That's why you make up your bull sh it arguments in defense of him. Shame on you!
Tiberius Posted May 7, 2019 Posted May 7, 2019 Operation boomerang Quote FBI Director Christopher Wray said Tuesday that he wouldn’t use the term “spying” to describe lawful FBI investigative activities in response to a question about Attorney General William Barr's controversial use of the word at a hearing last month. “Well, that’s not the term I would use,” Wray said at a Senate hearing when asked about Barr's use of the term to describe the FBI’s surveillance of members of the Trump campaign during the 2016 presidential election. Wray went on to emphasize the importance of ensuring that any surveillance is done consistent with the law. “Well, I mean, look, lots of people have different colloquial phrases. I believe that the FBI is engaged in investigative activity and part of investigative activity includes surveillance activity of different shapes and sizes,” Wray told Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.). “To me, the key question is making sure that it is done by the book, consistent with our lawful authorities," Wray said. “That’s the key question. Different people use different colloquial phrases.” https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/442454-fbi-director-says-he-wouldnt-use-spying-to-describe-fbi
McGee Return TD Posted May 7, 2019 Posted May 7, 2019 Is this only known as Operation Boomerang here in PPP and QANON Twitter/8/4/Chan? I can't find any reputable source claiming Barr has termed this investigation.
Recommended Posts