bdutton Posted July 6, 2020 Posted July 6, 2020 https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/505737-flynns-prosecution-the-more-we-learn-the-worse-it-seems Flynn's prosecution: The more we learn, the worse it seems 1
3rdnlng Posted July 6, 2020 Posted July 6, 2020 13 minutes ago, Winston Zeddemore said: He must act by the 15th. Betting odds presume he'll drag it out until then ... or maybe there will be some action later in the week (Thursday/Friday window). After seeing the way that Sullivan dealt with the Ted Stevens case it's surprising that he's developed such a hard on for Flynn.
keepthefaith Posted July 6, 2020 Posted July 6, 2020 25 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: After seeing the way that Sullivan dealt with the Ted Stevens case it's surprising that he's developed such a hard on for Flynn. Swamp.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted July 6, 2020 Posted July 6, 2020 35 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: After seeing the way that Sullivan dealt with the Ted Stevens case it's surprising that he's developed such a hard on for Flynn. ...Flynn is secondary....Trump is primary.......but Emmett is fair and impartial, with no political bias, right??............
Unforgiven Posted July 6, 2020 Posted July 6, 2020 1 hour ago, Nanker said: When is Sullivan going to get off his azz and dismiss the case? When sleepy joe is sworn in 1
B-Man Posted July 12, 2020 Posted July 12, 2020 Like many here................no new material. No new material? Adam Schiff still thinks using the word ‘Watergate’ to bludgeon Trump is a winning strategy
B-Man Posted July 17, 2020 Posted July 17, 2020 WHO YOU GONNA BELIEVE? ME, OR YOUR LYING EYES? As most anticipated, the RUSSIA! hoax continues to come apart. Sharyl Attkisson at JustTheNews.com moved a detailed read of The New York Times pushing the RUSSIA! hoax, and Peter Strzok’s now-public notes giving the lie to NYT reporting nine times: “The document reveals that the primary “source” of Steele’s election reporting was not some well-connected current or former Russian official, but a non-Russian-based contract employee of Christopher Steele’s firm. Moreover, it demonstrates that the information that Steele’s primary source provided him was second and third hand information and rumor at best… Critically, the document shows that Steele’s “primary sub-source” disagreed with and was surprised by how information he gave Steele was then conveyed by Steele in the Steele dossier.” Two questions for The New York Times:1) Will the NYT correct/retract or even perform an autopsy on what appear to be outright falsehoods; and 2) Only NINE times? 2
B-Man Posted July 18, 2020 Posted July 18, 2020 Prosecutor John Durham reveals the report into 'spying' on Trump's campaign will be released by the end of summer and says: 'The American people deserve to hear this story' by James Gordon Original Article
Buffalo_Gal Posted July 18, 2020 Posted July 18, 2020 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Prosecutor John Durham reveals the report into 'spying' on Trump's campaign will be released by the end of summer and says: 'The American people deserve to hear this story' by James Gordon Original Article Why do they keep repeating this? Durham has not spoken out. Durham is not issuing a report, he's the guy doing the indicting. A report is "not the goal" should be taken to mean... no report. It is as if the press is purposely misunderstanding this. Barr: Durham’s focused on indictments, not a report Jason Chaffetz: Indictments Doug Collins: 'There won’t be a report' from John Durham 3
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted July 20, 2020 Posted July 20, 2020 On 7/18/2020 at 2:11 PM, Buffalo_Gal said: Why do they keep repeating this? Durham has not spoken out. Durham is not issuing a report, he's the guy doing the indicting. A report is "not the goal" should be taken to mean... no report. It is as if the press is purposely misunderstanding this. Barr: Durham’s focused on indictments, not a report Jason Chaffetz: Indictments Doug Collins: 'There won’t be a report' from John Durham ...he really needs to release a preliminary report to capture any credibility......the details can follow, but this is turning into "cry wolf" crap......
B-Man Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 WELL, YES. IT WAS A SEDITIOUS POLITICAL CONSPIRACY, NOT A SERIOUS INVESTIGATION: FBI knew ‘collusion’ was a nothing-burger, but kept fake scandal alive anyway.
Buffalo_Gal Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 10 minutes ago, Hedge said: Right on time. They are nothing if not predictable. 4 1
Recommended Posts