Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

Now why in the world would he do that? Humm.

 

 

 

Judge Emmett Sullivan from General Flynn Trial, Arranged Speaking Gig for James Comey at Howard University for $100,000

 by Joe Hoft

Original Article

 

The confused judge who has unconstitutionally inserted himself into the Justice Department’s case against General Flynn made some actions behind the scene that are just as troubling.Judge Sullivan helped Jim Comey get his speaking gig at Howard University for $100,000. How much more corruption can America take. The corrupt judge who inserted himself into the General Flynn case, who insinuated the General was a traitor, has a lifestyle that matches his actions in court.

 

 

 

 

...any idea what Emmett's "booking fee" was?.......think the DC Circuit is basking in the glow of being shown up?......hmmm....

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

They keep hiring people who do nothing.  Does this guy have a beard?


:lol: Not that know of — but quarantine life may have changed that. 
 

I take two things from this announcement — 

 

1) It confirms what I’ve heard for weeks from my DC friends. 


2) If Durham passed off unmasking, assigning a deputy to it, that means that he’s got bigger targets/cases to make — which is excellent news. 

If I were McCabe, Comey, or Brennan tonight I’d be very uneasy. This on the heels of the RR testimony on the 3rd is lighting a fire under all the right people tonight. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:


:lol: Not that know of — but quarantine life may have changed that. 
 

I take two things from this announcement — 

 

1) It confirms what I’ve heard for weeks from my DC friends. 


2) If Durham passed off unmasking, assigning a deputy to it, that means that he’s got bigger targets/cases to make — which is excellent news. 

If I were McCabe, Comey, or Brennan tonight I’d be very uneasy. This on the heels of the RR testimony on the 3rd is lighting a fire under all the right people tonight. 

 

Did Q speak to you like the shepherds spoke to Mary?

 

 

Posted
Just now, Koko78 said:

 

Wait, so NOW liberals want justification for investigations?

 

It's hilarious. 

 

Asha is one of the more complicit worker bees in this mix too. She's deeply unstable. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's hilarious. 

 

Asha is one of the more complicit worker bees in this mix too. She's deeply unstable. 

 

Eh, at least she's *****able.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

BOOM – Dana Boente Removed! – FBI Chief Legal Counsel Forced to Resign…

Original Article

 

Finally, the DOJ has moved to remove one of the biggest background corrupt officials within the FBI. According to multiple media sources FBI chief legal counsel Dana Boente was forced to resign on Friday. Finally, sunlight has removed a very corrupt player. In prior positions as U.S. Attorney for Virginia; and while leading the DOJ National Security Division; and then later shifting to the FBI as chief legal counsel under Chris Wray; Dana Boente was at the epicenter of corrupt intent and malign activity toward the Trump administration.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Declassified transcripts add to evidence that FBI had no legal basis to interview Michael Flynn

by John Solomon

 

Original Article

 

In the end, the words that Michael Flynn uttered to Russia's ambassador that landed the former Trump national security in a three-year legal nightmare were simply this: "We need cool heads to prevail." That was the message Flynn delivered to Sergey Kislyak on Dec. 29, 2016, the day outgoing President Barack Obama imposed sanctions on Russia for meddling in the U.S. election, according to newly declassified transcripts of the conversation. Yes, Flynn talked sanctions. But his message not to escalate a sanctions war was similar to what his future boss, Donald Trump, presented the next day and what many other experts recommended.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

A little more on this. I don't know Adam, never met him, spoken with him. I do, however, know a few of his sources very well. And they are legit people with real access into the DOJ/FBI/USIC. So this isn't news to me, but it continues to astound me how unconcerned they seem to be about the political schedule up ahead. 

 

I don't know whether that's incredible hubris or because they're that convinced that they have airtight cases to make. 

 

(shrug)

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 5
×
×
  • Create New...