Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

Barr's personal review of Flynn, Stone, and now McCabe decisions are because Trump did not like the way the courts and/or Justice were deciding the issue.  Trump is directing the Justice Dept to attempt to reward his cronies and to punish his perceived enemies. 

 

Do you have any evidence of this?

Seems a lot like you’re speculating.

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

I suspect the vast majority of cases are delegated to lower Justice Dept personnel and are closed without the AG's input. 

 

Barr's personal review of Flynn, Stone, and now McCabe decisions are because Trump did not like the way the courts and/or Justice were deciding the issue.  Trump is directing the Justice Dept to attempt to reward his cronies and to punish his perceived enemies.  That slope is slippery and treacherous. 

 

 

 

...so then if Barr felt he was being directed or coerced, why wouldn't he walk away?......he could CERTAINLY  do much better monetarily in the private sector, right?....

Posted
21 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

Pulease!  Barr re-examining cases for Trump's guys is pretty strong indication that Barr is acting upon Trump's wishes. 

 

Does Trump wish to charge McCabe?    Of course, and Trump would not say to Barr,  'Ah, might as well let a guilty McCabe stay out of jail until later', would he?  Mr Vindictive?  The only reason Barr didn't overrule the McCabe decision was that he could find no way to legally justify doing that.   As much as he wants to please the boss, so far anyway, he still seems to care a smidge about appearances.

Flynn had the DOJ go after him when the FBI didn't think he committed a crime. The Deep State did everything they could to denigrate Flynn and keep his knowledge away from Trump. The Deep State's malfeasance is getting a second look. Roger Stone had been given a sentencing recommendation of 7-9 years by Mueller team prosecutors for doing less than James Wolfe did who got 2 months for lying to investigators and nothing for leaking Intelligence Committee secrets. Completely in line with treating people in a just manner.

10 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

I suspect the vast majority of cases are delegated to lower Justice Dept personnel and are closed without the AG's input. 

 

Barr's personal review of Flynn, Stone, and now McCabe decisions are because Trump did not like the way the courts and/or Justice were deciding the issue.  Trump is directing the Justice Dept to attempt to reward his cronies and to punish his perceived enemies.  That slope is slippery and treacherous. 

 

Shame on me for discussing anything with you. You pretend to be open minded but then inevitably come up with shitlikethis. 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

I suspect the vast majority of cases are delegated to lower Justice Dept personnel and are closed without the AG's input. 

 

Barr's personal review of Flynn, Stone, and now McCabe decisions are because Trump did not like the way the courts and/or Justice were deciding the issue.  Trump is directing the Justice Dept to attempt to reward his cronies and to punish his perceived enemies.  That slope is slippery and treacherous. 

 


You are a very dumb person. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:


You are a very dumb person. 

 

says someone who spends their time posting tweets online at a bills forum for six idiots to read

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

 

says someone who spends their time posting tweets online at a bills forum for six idiots to read

 

DR is doing his best to get paid to be a Trump influencer on Twitter but his multiple personalities take up too much of his time.

Posted
38 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

From your link:

 

The 40-page Inspector General report that prompted the criminal referral and preceeded Andrew McCabes termination from the FBI was released in April of 2018. What many don’t realize is that it also demonstrates massive potential corruption at the highest levels of the Obama DOJ. Then Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Andrew McCabe threatened the NY Field office and NYPD with arrests, should they disclose what they found on the laptop of Anthony Weiner.

Let’s rewind to November of 2016. James Comey had just announced they were reopening the investigation into the Clinton email matter because of emails found on Anthony Weiner’s laptop in a related sexting case. Weiner was later convicted of the charges. On November 4, 2016, Erik Prince did an interview on Breitbart News Daily (broadcast on Sirius XM) where he shared damning information about what was happening in the case.

At the time, it was relegated to “conspiracy theory”, because as Erik Prince indicated in the interview:

“They found State Department emails. They found a lot of other really damning criminal information, including money laundering, including the fact that Hillary went to this sex island with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton went there more than 20 times. Hillary Clinton went there at least six times,” he said.

“The amount of garbage that they found in these emails, of criminal activity by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and even by other Democratic members of Congress was so disgusting they gave it to the FBI, and they said, ‘We’re going to go public with this if you don’t reopen the investigation and you don’t do the right thing with timely indictments,’” Prince explained.”

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
On 2/14/2020 at 6:17 PM, Bob in Mich said:

Len, the point is Stone's treatment was no way rough, compared with what I described as common arrest tactics.  The Stone arrest looked like they had more force than was necessary, true, but a very common tactic and so, not unusual.

 

Again, my point is, that no knock arrests happen all the time and to an even worse degree, as demonstrated by the cannabis raids.  Right, no.  Unusual or especially rough for Stone, no.  What I recall seeing was very tame

yep, violent criminals get much harsher treatment, Bob.

wake the *****up...

 

https://twitter.com/JFNYC1/status/1229043535283998720

 

Edited by Foxx
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

 

Shame on me for discussing anything with you. You pretend to be open minded but then inevitably come up with shitlikethis. 

 

He's an a-hole.

 

 

 

 

Edited by 32ABBA
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

You wanted even handed investigations and I want not only even handed investigations but just outcomes. 

 

The government is still rife with lifers who have their own agenda. Before leaving office Obama quadrupled the amount of NSA staffers. Does that not cause reason to be concerned?

 

On a whim I clicked on "show this post" for one of my 2 ignores.

 

Glad I did. 

 

The utter hypocrisy in this post made me LOL so hard I spit out my coffee.

 

Thanks for that. :thumbsup:

 

Maybe you guys should divvy up the Elephant rather than all staying on different parts of the same Trunk.

 

Just a thought. :beer:

Posted
Just now, transplantbillsfan said:

 

On a whim I clicked on "show this post" for one of my 2 ignores.

 

Glad I did. 

 

The utter hypocrisy in this post made me LOL so hard I spit out my coffee.

 

Thanks for that. :thumbsup:

 

Maybe you guys should divvy up the Elephant rather than all staying on different parts of the same Trunk.

 

Just a thought. :beer:

 

Honest question: You think a bloated administrative state, comprised of unelected and unaccountable intel officers and analysts dictating policy from the shadows is a good thing? 

 

Are you at all familiar with the history of the CIA and the IC? And if you are, why would you ever be okay with the above?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

Maybe you guys should divvy up the Elephant rather than all staying on different parts of the same Trunk.

 

Maybe it’s not the trunk?

 

 

Posted

https://www.theblaze.com/news/doj-opens-news-investigation-into-james-comey-andrew-mccabe-peter-strzok-former-top-official-says

 

Panic for nothing. ;) 

 

 
 
 

Andrew Weissmann, a former top lawyer at the Justice Department who played a central role in Robert Mueller's investigation, said Friday the Justice Department has begun a new investigation into several former top FBI officials.

 

Weissmann, speaking to MSNBC host Chuck Todd, said the Justice Department has swapped its "loser case" against Andrew McCabe — in which the DOJ declined to pursue charges against McCabe for lying to investigators — for a new case against former FBI Director James Comey, McCabe, and Peter Strzok.

 

"All they did was swapped out a loser case for starting an investigation that is going to be of Comey, McCabe, Pete Strzok," Weissmann said, the Washington Examiner reported.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

On a whim I clicked on "show this post" for one of my 2 ignores.

 

Glad I did. 

 

The utter hypocrisy in this post made me LOL so hard I spit out my coffee.

 

Thanks for that. :thumbsup:

 

Maybe you guys should divvy up the Elephant rather than all staying on different parts of the same Trunk.

 

Just a thought. :beer:

So, your response makes no actual point other than reminding everyone here what a foolish little prick/clown you are. Aren't you the teacher who claims he gets his elementary school kids accepted into Harvard? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, snafu said:

 

Maybe it’s not the trunk?

 

 

 

Okay... you should all move away from the same tail then...

 

or side... 

 

or ear...

 

You're all blind and stuck on different parts of the same appendage shouting out similar descriptions and believing you have the correct holistic interpretation because you're all shouting similar things to each other.

Posted
7 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Okay... you should all move away from the same tail then...

 

or side... 

 

or ear...

 

You're all blind and stuck on different parts of the same appendage shouting out similar descriptions and believing you have the correct holistic interpretation because you're all shouting similar things to each other.

 

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Honest question: You think a bloated administrative state, comprised of unelected and unaccountable intel officers and analysts dictating policy from the shadows is a good thing? 

 

Are you at all familiar with the history of the CIA and the IC? And if you are, why would you ever be okay with the above?

 

×
×
  • Create New...