snafu Posted December 13, 2019 Posted December 13, 2019 9 hours ago, Tiberius said: Is Barr going to investigate the origins of the investigation that cost Hillary the election? Take you whataboutery and shove it. 1 1 1
keepthefaith Posted December 13, 2019 Posted December 13, 2019 9 hours ago, Tiberius said: The Electoral College elected Trump. Tough *****. Votes in NY and California in Presidential elections don't matter. 1
Taro T Posted December 13, 2019 Posted December 13, 2019 10 hours ago, Tiberius said: And announcing that bull crap investigation right before the election was fine, but looking at foreign interference--at the same time!---was wrong. Hypocrites Jack hole, had your syphocantic media and polsters not told the world that Clinton was crushing 45, the cowardly and apparently dumber than an FBI Director would be expected to be Comey would not have made the new e-mail transgressions public prior to the election. But, he figured that she was so far ahead that getting that #### up on her part out in public before the election would allow her to not be bothered with answering about it after she'd been crowned. Turns out, she wasn't. And only a pinhead would believe that people waited until November of '16 to make up their mind about what kind of a person Hillary was and what kind of a leader she would be. She quite likely was the ONLY "legitimate" candidate in the history of this country who could've lost to the main character on "The Apprentice.". He was arguably the worst candidate in our history. But, clearly he was at worst the 2nd worst. Congrats on worshiping THE worst.
3rdnlng Posted December 13, 2019 Posted December 13, 2019 5 hours ago, Taro T said: Jack hole, had your syphocantic media and polsters not told the world that Clinton was crushing 45, the cowardly and apparently dumber than an FBI Director would be expected to be Comey would not have made the new e-mail transgressions public prior to the election. But, he figured that she was so far ahead that getting that #### up on her part out in public before the election would allow her to not be bothered with answering about it after she'd been crowned. Turns out, she wasn't. And only a pinhead would believe that people waited until November of '16 to make up their mind about what kind of a person Hillary was and what kind of a leader she would be. She quite likely was the ONLY "legitimate" candidate in the history of this country who could've lost to the main character on "The Apprentice.". He was arguably the worst candidate in our history. But, clearly he was at worst the 2nd worst. Congrats on worshiping THE worst. Trump was not the worst candidate in our history. While he might have been the scariest candidate, he was a superb campaigner. He brought immense energy and enthusiasm to huge crowds that waited for hours in line to be included in his rallies. His policies resonated with the public and his brashness, while giving people trepidation also gave them hope. What tipped the scale was the opportunity for the next president to chose Supreme Court justices. Over the last decade or so our country has been dragged into areas that the majority didn't want to go. Same sex bathrooms, transgenders in the military, Occupy Wall Street and turning a blind eye to illegal aliens are just a few of the things that deeply bothered the majority of the voters. Trump was smart and put out a list of potential Supreme Court nominees. He made promises that people hoped were true. He was transparent while Hillary embodied a special kind of transparency. The public could see right through her and didn't like her based on the last 30 years of her sleaziness. I think what tipped the scales was that while Trump was working extremely hard on winning the presidency, holding multiple rallies per day, she went through the motions and appeared that she believed she was entitled to the presidency. 2 1
ALF Posted December 13, 2019 Posted December 13, 2019 13 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Trump was not the worst candidate in our history. While he might have been the scariest candidate, he was a superb campaigner. He brought immense energy and enthusiasm to huge crowds that waited for hours in line to be included in his rallies. His policies resonated with the public and his brashness, while giving people trepidation also gave them hope. What tipped the scale was the opportunity for the next president to chose Supreme Court justices. Over the last decade or so our country has been dragged into areas that the majority didn't want to go. Same sex bathrooms, transgenders in the military, Occupy Wall Street and turning a blind eye to illegal aliens are just a few of the things that deeply bothered the majority of the voters. Trump was smart and put out a list of potential Supreme Court nominees. He made promises that people hoped were true. He was transparent while Hillary embodied a special kind of transparency. The public could see right through her and didn't like her based on the last 30 years of her sleaziness. I think what tipped the scales was that while Trump was working extremely hard on winning the presidency, holding multiple rallies per day, she went through the motions and appeared that she believed she was entitled to the presidency. I have to admit that really sums up why Trump is so popular with his base, well done ? 2
Tiberius Posted December 13, 2019 Posted December 13, 2019 7 hours ago, Taro T said: Jack hole, had your syphocantic media and polsters not told the world that Clinton was crushing 45, the cowardly and apparently dumber than an FBI Director would be expected to be Comey would not have made the new e-mail transgressions public prior to the election. But, he figured that she was so far ahead that getting that #### up on her part out in public before the election would allow her to not be bothered with answering about it after she'd been crowned. Turns out, she wasn't. And only a pinhead would believe that people waited until November of '16 to make up their mind about what kind of a person Hillary was and what kind of a leader she would be. She quite likely was the ONLY "legitimate" candidate in the history of this country who could've lost to the main character on "The Apprentice.". He was arguably the worst candidate in our history. But, clearly he was at worst the 2nd worst. Congrats on worshiping THE worst. Your theory holds up until you make the point about Hillary being only one who could of lost. He beat the entire Republican field. Not ot sure why you say I worship her. She would of been a better prez than your boy Trump. Go Sabres! Great game last night. We are in a playoff spot now!
Chef Jim Posted December 13, 2019 Posted December 13, 2019 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Not ot sure why you say I worship her. She would of been a better prez than your boy Trump. Please explain, in detail, why you think she would have been a better President 1
3rdnlng Posted December 13, 2019 Posted December 13, 2019 11 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Please explain, in detail, why you think she would have been a better President He said she "would of" been a better president. Look it up in the "Dictionary For Dummies". Sheesh.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 13, 2019 Posted December 13, 2019 19 hours ago, Tiberius said: The Electoral College elected Trump. ...um is this something new?....OR now unacceptable?........and why did the Dems rattle the "eliminate Electoral College" sabre?........perhaps the results?....SMH.....
Koko78 Posted December 13, 2019 Posted December 13, 2019 26 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...um is this something new?....OR now unacceptable?........and why did the Dems rattle the "eliminate Electoral College" sabre?........perhaps the results?....SMH..... The Democrats only care about the electoral college when they win, otherwise it's undemocratic (nevermind that we are NOT a democracy). It's all about the popular vote... because they can't even claim a majority. 1
Dr. Who Posted December 13, 2019 Posted December 13, 2019 11 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...um is this something new?....OR now unacceptable?........and why did the Dems rattle the "eliminate Electoral College" sabre?........perhaps the results?....SMH..... Totalitarians don't like a republic. They also tend to be dim. Electoral college is fine so long as Dems win. When the left loses, they want to destroy institutions. They love the Supreme Court as a way to impose social change when they can't pass legislation in its favor. But when the balance of power begins to tilt, they suddenly want to pack the Court. Nine is now a negotiable number. When was the last time a Republican won the presidency without the corrupt media and the whining Left claiming the election was stolen from them? They couldn't argue that with Reagan, so they went with dumb, bellicose Cowboy. George H. W. Bush, a genuine war hero, was a whimp. W. didn't really win and Trump colluded with Russians and then tried to influence Ukraine (because he's so frightened of gaffe-ridden, corrupt, Mr. Magoo Biden). Obama actually used the internal revenue service to terrorize conservatives, deep state resources to sell guns to Mexico, to spy on Trump, the Ukraine actually tried to help Clinton win, Clinton actually destroyed evidence to obstruct justice, Biden actually engaged in a quid pro quo and boasted about it to a sycophant press that continues to propagandize with religious zealotry for any and all progressive ideologues. But pointing all this out doesn't phase the dim; you are an uninformed Nazi and they are enlightened and compassionate. Over three years of trying to impeach Trump for beating Madam President. Jessie Smollet fakes an assault and cries Maga hat bigots. The left does handstands and gleefully runs with a dubious story without an ounce of skepticism. Black Hebrews shoot up and kill innocent Jews and others in NJ. The left jumps to the conclusion that it was white nationalists inspired by Trump. They never apologize, never correct themselves, always smugly condescend. The hell with 'em. 3 5 5
B-Man Posted December 13, 2019 Posted December 13, 2019 ANALYSIS: TRUE. Washington Examiner: The FBI didn’t commit ‘errors and omissions.’ It abused its power. “The FBI sought a warrant to wiretap a U.S. citizen and, in effect, a U.S. presidential campaign, based on a shoddy Democrat-funded pile of conspiracy theories known as the Steele dossier. The dossier’s allegations against then-candidate Donald Trump were based on ‘multiple layers of hearsay upon hearsay,’ and the document also took seriously comments made in jest. In other words, the origins of the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign was exactly as partisan and shoddy as Republicans said it was, according to the information released by the Justice Department’s inspector general.” . 4
Foxx Posted December 13, 2019 Posted December 13, 2019 https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1205525116098154498 2 1 2
Foxx Posted December 14, 2019 Posted December 14, 2019 https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1205650359479193600 4
B-Man Posted December 14, 2019 Posted December 14, 2019 Obama Wanted To Know Everything His Trump Spies Were Doing, And It Looks Like He Did by Chris Farrell Original Article When it comes to the unlawful surveillance on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, the most important question is, what did President Obama know and when did he know it? If we are to believe the testimony in the Justice Department inspector general’s report on FISA abuse, Obama didn’t know anything about the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. Neither did his attorney general, her deputy, or anyone in the White House. At least not that they can recall – an expression used over 200 times in the report. Yet against this we have the Sept. 2, 2016, text message from Lisa Page to her paramour Peter Strzok saying “POTUS wants to know everything we are doing.” . 2 2
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 14, 2019 Posted December 14, 2019 16 minutes ago, B-Man said: Obama Wanted To Know Everything His Trump Spies Were Doing, And It Looks Like He Did by Chris Farrell Original Article When it comes to the unlawful surveillance on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, the most important question is, what did President Obama know and when did he know it? If we are to believe the testimony in the Justice Department inspector general’s report on FISA abuse, Obama didn’t know anything about the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. Neither did his attorney general, her deputy, or anyone in the White House. At least not that they can recall – an expression used over 200 times in the report. Yet against this we have the Sept. 2, 2016, text message from Lisa Page to her paramour Peter Strzok saying “POTUS wants to know everything we are doing.” . ....a purely unqualified, Jr senator, cardboard prop of the Clinton Dynasty based on race and oratorical skills, nothing else.....he carried on their political dirtiness as directed......and the fickle electorate took the bait hook, line and sinker......as an adjunct, look at how FBI and DOJ have been exposed as woefully corrupt political manipulatives to accentuate the word "dirty"....reprehensible....Dirty J Edgar?.....Nixon/Watergate?.......seriously?.... 3
Deranged Rhino Posted December 15, 2019 Posted December 15, 2019 Comey just puckered. It was all cute tweets when they had an (illegal) SCO going and the media pushing the proven false narrative that he was a Russian asset -- now that he's clear, and the evidence against Comey is undeniable, this takes on more weight. Will be SO much fun watching the bracelets go on that gigantic asshat. 3
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted December 15, 2019 Posted December 15, 2019 On 12/13/2019 at 10:45 AM, Dr. Who said: Totalitarians don't like a republic. They also tend to be dim. Electoral college is fine so long as Dems win. When the left loses, they want to destroy institutions. They love the Supreme Court as a way to impose social change when they can't pass legislation in its favor. But when the balance of power begins to tilt, they suddenly want to pack the Court. Nine is now a negotiable number. When was the last time a Republican won the presidency without the corrupt media and the whining Left claiming the election was stolen from them? They couldn't argue that with Reagan, so they went with dumb, bellicose Cowboy. George H. W. Bush, a genuine war hero, was a whimp. W. didn't really win and Trump colluded with Russians and then tried to influence Ukraine (because he's so frightened of gaffe-ridden, corrupt, Mr. Magoo Biden). Obama actually used the internal revenue service to terrorize conservatives, deep state resources to sell guns to Mexico, to spy on Trump, the Ukraine actually tried to help Clinton win, Clinton actually destroyed evidence to obstruct justice, Biden actually engaged in a quid pro quo and boasted about it to a sycophant press that continues to propagandize with religious zealotry for any and all progressive ideologues. But pointing all this out doesn't phase the dim; you are an uninformed Nazi and they are enlightened and compassionate. Over three years of trying to impeach Trump for beating Madam President. Jessie Smollet fakes an assault and cries Maga hat bigots. The left does handstands and gleefully runs with a dubious story without an ounce of skepticism. Black Hebrews shoot up and kill innocent Jews and others in NJ. The left jumps to the conclusion that it was white nationalists inspired by Trump. They never apologize, never correct themselves, always smugly condescend. The hell with 'em. ? 1 1
/dev/null Posted December 15, 2019 Posted December 15, 2019 On 12/13/2019 at 10:45 AM, Dr. Who said: Totalitarians don't like a republic. They also tend to be dim. Electoral college is fine so long as Dems win. When the left loses, they want to destroy institutions. They love the Supreme Court as a way to impose social change when they can't pass legislation in its favor. But when the balance of power begins to tilt, they suddenly want to pack the Court. Nine is now a negotiable number. When was the last time a Republican won the presidency without the corrupt media and the whining Left claiming the election was stolen from them? They couldn't argue that with Reagan, so they went with dumb, bellicose Cowboy. George H. W. Bush, a genuine war hero, was a whimp. W. didn't really win and Trump colluded with Russians and then tried to influence Ukraine (because he's so frightened of gaffe-ridden, corrupt, Mr. Magoo Biden). Obama actually used the internal revenue service to terrorize conservatives, deep state resources to sell guns to Mexico, to spy on Trump, the Ukraine actually tried to help Clinton win, Clinton actually destroyed evidence to obstruct justice, Biden actually engaged in a quid pro quo and boasted about it to a sycophant press that continues to propagandize with religious zealotry for any and all progressive ideologues. But pointing all this out doesn't phase the dim; you are an uninformed Nazi and they are enlightened and compassionate. Over three years of trying to impeach Trump for beating Madam President. Jessie Smollet fakes an assault and cries Maga hat bigots. The left does handstands and gleefully runs with a dubious story without an ounce of skepticism. Black Hebrews shoot up and kill innocent Jews and others in NJ. The left jumps to the conclusion that it was white nationalists inspired by Trump. They never apologize, never correct themselves, always smugly condescend. The hell with 'em. 1 1
CoudyBills Posted December 15, 2019 Posted December 15, 2019 On 12/12/2019 at 11:32 PM, snafu said: Take you whataboutery and shove it. I'm certain the fact that people saw Hillary for the geriatric alcoholic she is had something to do with her losing. 1 1
Recommended Posts