Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

I'm aware of that and the evidence of that is flimsy.  Assange was trying to find a way for Manning to anonymously hack in and send him those files in order to protect his source.  Those charges are nothing new.  It was brought up in the Manning trial and the Obama DOJ didn't believe they had enough to prosecute Assange with anything as they concluded there's no way to distinguish Wikileaks from the Washington Post for example.  

 

This is nothing like what a reporter for the NYT would do or face, comparing them is absurd

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

I'm aware of that and the evidence of that is flimsy.  Assange was trying to find a way for Manning to anonymously hack in and send him those files in order to protect his source.  Those charges are nothing new.  It was brought up in the Manning trial and the Obama DOJ didn't believe they had enough to prosecute Assange with anything as they concluded there's no way to distinguish Wikileaks from the Washington Post for example.  

No, there are other plausible reasons Obama didn't want to go after Assange, the biggest of which would be the possible discovery that DNC wasn't hacked by Russia. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, GG said:

No, there are other plausible reasons Obama didn't want to go after Assange, the biggest of which would be the possible discovery that DNC wasn't hacked by Russia. 


Possible discovery!? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Possible discovery!? 

I never speak definitively of theories that haven't been proven. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, GG said:

No, there are other plausible reasons Obama didn't want to go after Assange, the biggest of which would be the possible discovery that DNC wasn't hacked by Russia. 

This was back in 2013.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/julian-assange-unlikely-to-face-us-charges-over-publishing-classified-documents/2013/11/25/dd27decc-55f1-11e3-8304-caf30787c0a9_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.cacedfd67ad6

Posted
3 hours ago, /dev/null said:

 

Bradley Manning will be a wild card in any Assange trial

 

He has nothing to gain by covering for Assange.  By virtue of his pardon, he can provide detailed testimony regarding how WikiLeaks operates with absolutely no fear of punishment.  However if he covers for Assange and is found to have perjured himself, he could face further prison time

 

Obama may have issued a full pardon to somebody that may end up providing testimony damaging to members of the Obama Administration

 

Manning was never pardoned. His/Its sentence was commuted, but the conviction stands.

Posted
On 4/11/2019 at 5:40 PM, Cinga said:

I don't know that it's really that complicated. Assange comes here where he is questioned by Barr and given a sweet deal of freedom once again if he tells him what he knows about Rich, the DNC server, Podesta, etc... 

Trump acted so stupid when questioned about this, it seems like there is a lot expected from this. Or, nothing at all, haha. Feast or famine.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Paulus said:

Trump acted so stupid when questioned about this, it seems like there is a lot expected from this. Or, nothing at all, haha. Feast or famine.

Trump's aware he encouraged them during the campaign.  He's playing dumb/being himself.  This has more to do with Mike Pompeo who signaled Wikileaks out as a hostile intelligence agency working with Russia in his first speech as CIA Director shortly after being confirmed in early 2017.  Of course, he welcome Wikileaks leaked DNC e-mails during the campaign.  He deleted this tweet.  Then Wikileaks started publishing CIA documents showing sophisticated methods of how they break into people's phones, computers, etc... after Trump took office and his tune changed.

 

Dalq4y-XcAAnQ7s.jpg

 

2Q==

Posted

Will be interesting to see what Mueller has to say about Russians giving Assange the stolen emails, like Mueller's previous indictment states, and why Trump and compnay seemed to know in advance about all this. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Will be interesting to see what Mueller has to say about Russians giving Assange the stolen emails, like Mueller's previous indictment states, and why Trump and compnay seemed to know in advance about all this. 

Russia didn't give Assange the emails.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Foxx said:

Russia didn't give Assange the emails.

And you are saying that because...."I Love WikiLeaks!" 

 

You understand that if they did Trump was using Russia to win the Presidency. Sad 

Quote

WASHINGTON — The special counsel investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election issued an indictment of 12 Russian intelligence officers on Friday in the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton presidential campaign. The indictment came only three days before President Trump was planning to meet with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia in Helsinki, Finland.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/13/us/politics/mueller-indictment-russian-intelligence-hacking.html

Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

So did Putin. 

 

Yeah, Putin hated Hillary so much that the Russians donated how many millions to the Clinton Foundation? They paid Bill how many hundreds of thousands of dollars to give speeches?

 

You truly are an idiot.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Yeah, Putin hated Hillary so much that the Russians donated how many millions to the Clinton Foundation? They paid Bill how many hundreds of thousands of dollars to give speeches?

 

You truly are an idiot.

So defensive! 

 

You must know I am right. Trump got help from Russia and readily accepted it. Take a chill pill dude. Just accept the truth. 

 

"I love WikiLeaks!" 

Posted
28 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You must know I am right.

 

Statistically, you're eventually bound to be right at some point. However, it's just not your time.

×
×
  • Create New...