Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Seasons1992 said:

Someone in the organization or in county government said that with the renovations done a few years ago, the stadium had "good bones" and should last another 50 years. There's no reason to change things now. 

Things I would change: 

 

1. SEATS FOR EVERYONE. I'm sick of the bleachers. Reduce capacity, give me a damn seat. I'll pay more.

2. A "roof" over the seated portion. Not a real roof, but something like a Premier League/MLS soccer stadium. Keep it open air.

3. Turn off the damn train sound on 3rd downs. Am I really asking for all that much?

 

 

 

 

I also want tables in the concourses. You have all these good food options. But eating him on your lap isn't always the easiest. Give me those high, round-top style tables like they have in the arena.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

I propose a new build constructed entirely of recycled material from the old stadium and compost.  This "Green New Field" is exactly the type of thing the lawmakers and down state can get behind. 

 

I would call it Trough Field.  Also, BRING BACK THE TROUGHS!!!

Posted
6 minutes ago, wagon127 said:

I also want tables in the concourses. You have all these good food options. But eating him on your lap isn't always the easiest. Give me those high, round-top style tables like they have in the arena.

You can't even walk in the concourses (too small/crowded) and you want them to add tables in there? Disaster.

1 minute ago, Jauronimo said:

I propose a new build constructed entirely of recycled material from the old stadium and compost.  This "Green New Field" is exactly the type of thing the lawmakers and down state can get behind. 

 

I would call it Trough Field.  Also, BRING BACK THE TROUGHS!!!

 

No meat will be served. Cow farts are too damaging to environment

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Mrbojanglezs said:

You can't even walk in the concourses (too small/crowded) and you want them to add tables in there? Disaster.

 

 

You would just need to be smart where these table's get placed. There are spots where it would work. The entrance ways at the top of the Upper deck ramp. That area used to be for smoking. The end zone exit area's in the corner of the 100 level could also have room for some tables. And I am talking about small tables too, 2-3 feet in diameter at most.

Edited by wagon127
Posted
21 minutes ago, Seasons1992 said:

Someone in the organization or in county government said that with the renovations done a few years ago, the stadium had "good bones" and should last another 50 years. There's no reason to change things now. 

Things I would change: 

 

1. SEATS FOR EVERYONE. I'm sick of the bleachers. Reduce capacity, give me a damn seat. I'll pay more.

2. A "roof" over the seated portion. Not a real roof, but something like a Premier League/MLS soccer stadium. Keep it open air.

3. Turn off the damn train sound on 3rd downs. Am I really asking for all that much?

 

 

 

 

 

 

So agree with the seats thing.

 

For crying out loud we are sports fans, not viking rowers.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

can the local economy even afford new stadium ticket prices? 

24 minutes ago, Seasons1992 said:

Someone in the organization or in county government said that with the renovations done a few years ago, the stadium had "good bones" and should last another 50 years. There's no reason to change things now. 

Things I would change: 

 

1. SEATS FOR EVERYONE. I'm sick of the bleachers. Reduce capacity, give me a damn seat. I'll pay more.

2. A "roof" over the seated portion. Not a real roof, but something like a Premier League/MLS soccer stadium. Keep it open air.

3. Turn off the damn train sound on 3rd downs. Am I really asking for all that much?

 

 

 

 

 

#3 should actually turn out to be a cost savings ! 

Posted
3 hours ago, wppete said:

“You have to make the determination of do you build a new stadium or do you renovate the existing stadium and get the best bang for the buck,”

Seems like our politician has already made up his mind on the matter. I'm sure he's not just giving us a personal opinion and has studied the matter in depth. Let the Pegula's finish the study, and make an informed decision. It just seems that New Era is turning into a money pit will all the money that's being spent each year without make any significant progress.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

#3 should actually turn out to be a cost savings ! 

 

The Pegula's can simply grab the train horn from KeyBank Center and re-purpose it if they're going to keep it...........it's not like the Sabres are utilizing this currently.

  • Haha (+1) 4
Posted
4 minutes ago, Seasons1992 said:

 

The Pegula's can simply grab the train horn from KeyBank Center and re-purpose it if they're going to keep it...........it's not like the Sabres are utilizing this currently.

It's gently used

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
2 hours ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

We don't sell out all our games. In fact in 2018 we were 28th in percentage of capacity.

 

http://www.espn.com/nfl/attendance/_/year/2018/sort/homePct

 

My 2 cents ......   Forget capacity. Give us real #'s

Stadium seating varies ( 50 K to 90 K).  I would assume the capacity is a % of being full.

90% 0f 

 

The NFL average looks to be 65000.   Buffalo at 90% = 64447

 

The Bills is currently @ 71,608 (I recall up to 80k in the 90's?) 

Soldier Field 61,500 seats

Raiders 53,286 seats

Chargers *  27,000 seats

 

https://geoshen.com/posts/nfl-stadiums-ranked-by-seating-capacity

5 minutes ago, Mike in Horseheads said:

It's gently used

Why does your avatar look sad?  

 

2 hours ago, Mike in Horseheads said:

Then why don't you just give the current field a major redo if your staying there?

they have been season after season (so I've read and seen)  

 

NFL wants New and Flashy.  

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Just follow the money!! This conversation isn’t about fan experience or watching the game. The Pegula’s, NFL and other owners want the Bills to make more money. That’s the reason that this discussion is being had. NY and Erie County want to spend as little as possible on this endeavor. There is NOTHING else relevant to the conversation. It’s just a matter of where in the middle they meet.

Exactly.  This is done.  A new stadium is coming. Now the posturing begins to see which entity pays what.  I believe the Pegula's already know what they need to know, I.e. location and type (won't be a roof involved) in a fixed or retractable style.  I'd be willing to bet they do have an overhang like the Seahawks have with their stadium, but it will be open air.

Edited by purple haze
Posted
2 hours ago, Logic said:

On the other hand, I think the NFL wants the stadium downtown. And a multi-use downtown stadium (with at least a retractable roof, as gross as that sounds) is probably the best way to get the funds needed to build the thing.

 

If the NFL wants it downtown then they should pay for it and guarantee money to Pegulas for any decision they pressure/impose.  Then the Pegulas can say "You want a 65K stadium with half boxes and PSLs of 10K per seat, fine, but you pay for every seat not sold."

22 minutes ago, the skycap said:

Politics. This is the reason Chick Fil A isn't coming to the Buffalo Niagara International Airport. Thanks Sean Ryan

Since I usually fly out on Sundays I do not care.

Posted (edited)

I remember someone here giving us the real reason the Pegula's want a new stadium. It is not about the stadium suitability,  the suitability of the stadium for the players or the game of football,  the fans,  or a better fan experience. It is all about profit. It is much, much harder psychologically to convince fans to pay a lot more to attend a game at a renovated stadium than it is to with a brand new one in a different location. If it is renovated one, it is easier for the fan to compare it to what they had in the old stadium.  The new stadium in a new location makes it easier to distract and confuse the fan about what is honestly a fair and reasonable cost to them to attend the game.

If our government stopped paying welfare to billionaires so they could make more money, there would be no conversation. We would get the best stadium for the best bang for the buck. A business would make the decision based on logic, not just say it really does not matter what the cost is. As the owner I get all the benefits, and someone else pays the costs. It is a win, win for the billionaires.

Edited by simpleman
Posted

IMO, the delta of dollars required between a 25-year major renovation of New Era Field and a new stadium on the same "campus" isnt much.  With a new stadium, they are going to have a clean slate as far as layout.  With N.E.F., they are somewhat bound by the underground footprint and the general engineering restrictions.  Major structural overhaul will cost almost as much as a new stadium.

 

 

I see the downtown idea coming with so much additional cost due to the infrastructure.  

Posted

He's right. The Ralph is great, not every stadium has to be a carbon copy of Jerry World.The experience at Orchard Park is a huge draw for those in Toronto/Southern Ontario who are sick of the sterile/corporate Toronto venues. Don't rip off the taxpayers.

Posted
8 minutes ago, simpleman said:

I remember someone here giving us the real reason the Pegula's want a new stadium. It is not about the stadium suitability,  the suitability of the stadium for the players or the game of football,  the fans,  or a better fan experience. It is all about profit. It is much, much harder psychologically to convince fans to pay a lot more to attend a game at a renovated stadium than it is to with a brand new one in a different location. If it is renovated one, it is easier for the fan to compare it to what they had in the old stadium.  The new stadium in a new location makes it easier to distract and confuse the fan about what is honestly a fair and reasonable cost to them to attend the game.

If our government stopped paying welfare to billionaires so they could make more money, there would be no conversation. We would get the best stadium for the best bang for the buck. A business would make the decision based on logic, not just say it really does not matter what the cost is. As the owner I get all the benefits, and someone else pays the costs. It is a win, win for the billionaires.

 


Have they publicly stated that they want to build a new stadium? I could be misremembering, but I feel like it's only been the league/Goodell that has said they want the Bills to build a new stadium.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...