Buffalo716 Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 37 minutes ago, Augie said: Hmmm, so who’s the fool now? As of now... not mr McMahon 1
Doc Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 Just now, Buffalo716 said: As of now... not mr McMahon He will be in another year. Those guys want to get back to the NFL as well.
Buffalo716 Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 Just now, Doc said: He will be in another year. Those guys want to get back to the NFL as well. Well of course the chances of being successful are slim but he didn’t put out a rushed product
Steptide Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 Here's the problem with football leagues other than the NFL. They put teams in cities where NFL teams don't exist. Imo, the AAF should have teams in Chicago, Dallas, L.A. Etc. Put these teams in major cities. It's a short schedule and I feel like major cities woukd support these teams better than places like Orlando or Salt Lake city.
Beast Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 I tried watching it the first couple of weeks. It bored me to tears.
Mr. WEO Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 1 hour ago, Alphadawg7 said: I didn’t see a thread dedicated to this story. There is a 33 page AAF thread for general convo, but many of us stopped going to it to talk AAF games we aren’t watching. This is a specific story to discuss, not the games and all that stuff. The stiry you cited was posted a few days ago in that thread.
Chandler#81 Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 I’m not surprised. I’ve watch a few Orlando games and the fans have progressively lessened to around TEN yesterday. And they’re the best team in the League! Yesterday’s game vs Chicago was actually pretty entertaining, but the final 5 minutes took over a half an hour. I got so bored, I starting counting fans. That took less time than a 30 second Time Out...
PromoTheRobot Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 2 hours ago, Joe in Winslow said: Ah, unions. K, Scrooge. 2 minutes ago, Chandler#81 said: I’m not surprised. I’ve watch a few Orlando games and the fans have progressively lessened to around TEN yesterday. And they’re the best team in the League! Yesterday’s game vs Chicago was actually pretty entertaining, but the final 5 minutes took over a half an hour. I got so bored, I starting counting fans. That took less time than a 30 second Time Out... Chicago?
PromoTheRobot Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 25 minutes ago, Steptide said: Here's the problem with football leagues other than the NFL. They put teams in cities where NFL teams don't exist. Imo, the AAF should have teams in Chicago, Dallas, L.A. Etc. Put these teams in major cities. It's a short schedule and I feel like major cities woukd support these teams better than places like Orlando or Salt Lake city. Bad idea playing in NFL cities. What the AAF should do is contract to 6 teams, all in Texas, all teams a bus ride away from each other. The only city to embrace the AAF was San Antonio because Texans love football. Heck even Jerry Jones loves him some AAF. It's a developmental league. There's no need to spread teams around the country. Same money on travel and eliminate 2 to 4 teams.
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 I kept saying; no north eastern teams mean no chance but then I kept getting into the same arguments with people missing the point. Telling me the north east doesn’t need minor league teams....The AAF NEEDS the north east. NYC, PHI, BOS, PIT. Without those markets, the league has no shot. It will be right and they won’t make it. Sports leagues need the areas with the most people. And they absolutely need the areas with actual interest in sports. 1
/dev/null Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 5 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: I kept saying; no north eastern teams mean no chance but then I kept getting into the same arguments with people missing the point. Telling me the north east doesn’t need minor league teams....The AAF NEEDS the north east. NYC, PHI, BOS, PIT. Without those markets, the league has no shot. It will be right and they won’t make it. Sports leagues need the areas with the most people. And they absolutely need the areas with actual interest in sports. Should have skipped Atlanta in favor of Columbus
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 4 minutes ago, /dev/null said: Should have skipped Atlanta in favor of Columbus Should have done one of the cities I said instead of making it something totally different. NYC, Phi, Bos or pit
JerseyBills Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 32 minutes ago, Binghamton Beast said: I tried watching it the first couple of weeks. It bored me to tears. Ya. I watched the first night and besides reading a couple articles on it , I have no desire to continue watching . Myself along with many on here are football junkies too so I figured it was destined to doom sooner than later. Every football fan I talk to on a regular has no interest in the AAF . I just think the NFL has nearly turned into an all year sport, with FA and the draft , than before you know it training camp , it's going to be extremely difficult for any league to have even moderate success competing against a giant like the NFL. I am intrigued by the XFL. For McMahon to have the stones to start it up again after failing hard the first time makes me wonder what they have up their sleeve that they feel it can be a success this time around 1
Doc Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 50 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said: Well of course the chances of being successful are slim but he didn’t put out a rushed product It's a money grab by the NFLPA, nothing more, nothing less. 1
Big Turk Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 1 hour ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ..somehow I think the ONLY successful football merger we will see in our lifetime is the NFL-AFL in 1970.......NFL has become a $12+ BILLION dollar cash cow and doesn't need to be bothered with these "frivolities"....how many years have MLB and NHL had extensive minor league developmental systems?......and the NFL has??.....perhaps NCAA was thought to be their "developmental league (free of charge).......but the focus of college ball is butts in the seats, happy happy megabucks boosters and mega million dollar bowl payouts versus getting players "pro ready" for the NFL style game......probably dead wrong and too old, but don't see it changing any time soon.....instead, they'll be focusing on the strong potential for labor strife when CBA expires...... They had NFL Europe for several years but nothing since...in some ways the CFL already acts as a developmental league in that players who show enough potential there usually come to the NFL. Realistically how useful is a developmental league for guys who are basically scrubs at the end of the day??
Beast Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 (edited) 24 minutes ago, JerseyBills said: Ya. I watched the first night and besides reading a couple articles on it , I have no desire to continue watching . Myself along with many on here are football junkies too so I figured it was destined to doom sooner than later. Every football fan I talk to on a regular has no interest in the AAF . I just think the NFL has nearly turned into an all year sport, with FA and the draft , than before you know it training camp , it's going to be extremely difficult for any league to have even moderate success competing against a giant like the NFL. I am intrigued by the XFL. For McMahon to have the stones to start it up again after failing hard the first time makes me wonder what they have up their sleeve that they feel it can be a success this time around Yeah, I’ll give McMahon a chance because the guy does know entertainment. May be a spectacle at the very least. Edited March 31, 2019 by Binghamton Beast 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 2 minutes ago, matter2003 said: They had NFL Europe for several years but nothing since...in some ways the CFL already acts as a developmental league in that players who show enough potential there usually come to the NFL. Realistically how useful is a developmental league for guys who are basically scrubs at the end of the day?? ....so then why does MLB and NHL have longstanding, vast minor league developmental levels?.....I have to preface by question by realistically comparing length of seasons....162 vs 80 vs 16, SUBSTANTIAL differences.....NFLE seemed to be working although I'm not sure about across the pond.....Gunner Bill is in the UK and can speak to interest first hand.....and then it vanished...
HansLanda Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 They either need to become a true minor league with team affiliations or it's doom. 1
PlayoffsPlease Posted March 31, 2019 Posted March 31, 2019 11 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ....so then why does MLB and NHL have longstanding, vast minor league developmental levels?.....I have to preface by question by realistically comparing length of seasons....162 vs 80 vs 16, SUBSTANTIAL differences.....NFLE seemed to be working although I'm not sure about across the pond.....Gunner Bill is in the UK and can speak to interest first hand.....and then it vanished... Because MLB and NHL are incredibly different. The future stars in the MLB and NHL leagues are generally kids who were drafted straight out of high school. The NFL has the NCAA to handle 99% of star player development. The previous poster is dead on that the AAF is basically developing players who are at most, likely to be role players. Virtually no stars are going to come out of the AAF.
Recommended Posts