Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
48 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

I hope they do, with either Barr or Trump. The trial before the Senate would be a hoot.

 

I trust Nancy is too wily to accept it, but if the economy holds up another year they may see no other choice but to impeach....

 

 

Posted
40 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Fair enough, but what I was getting at is what is he getting out of doing so? What's his endgame?

 

Perhaps Mueller is working with Barr (either willingly or being compelled), in an effort to simply stall for time, to allow for the OIG report to wrap up completely. The Barr vs Mueller soap opera is focusing House Judiciary Committee time that then can't be used elsewhere. It would fit into team Trump's classic strategy of *look over here* not *over there*. 

 

But I believe @Deranged Rhino had mentioned that the OIG report was already being circulated behind closed doors, so buying time may not be necessary...

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

Sorry if this has already been posted.  It is ReasonTv with Napolitano.  Talks a lot about Trump/Mueller/Barr

 

He also talks about Flynn lying because the President asked him to talk to the Russians about sanctions pre- inauguration and Flynn was covering

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzyEi4TtIrA

 

Judge Nap is comped and has been for awhile. He knows nothing about Flynn -- and is lying in this interview (deliberately or unknowingly), relying on him as a source at this point is beyond idiotic. He's proven over and over that he knows nothing about this topic as he's been wrong at every turn.

Posted
39 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Judge Nap is comped and has been for awhile. He knows nothing about Flynn -- and is lying in this interview (deliberately or unknowingly), relying on him as a source at this point is beyond idiotic. He's proven over and over that he knows nothing about this topic as he's been wrong at every turn.

 

he is reading a script written for him

 

it's fun when the staff hates the host so much that they sabotage him on the cue cards, like they did for Larry King and Will McDonough

 

 

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

"He added, “Here’s what I say, we’re confronting a constitutional crisis as I speak to you. As I look the people of America in the eye, I’m telling you, we have a constitutional crisis. the chief executive office of the president of the United States refuses to comply with subpoenas and says he will order others to do so, this creates a constitutional crisis”"

 

Goddammit, you stupid *****, why wasn't this a constitutional crisis when Obama and Holder did it, then???  :wallbash:

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
13 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

"He added, “Here’s what I say, we’re confronting a constitutional crisis as I speak to you. As I look the people of America in the eye, I’m telling you, we have a constitutional crisis. the chief executive office of the president of the United States refuses to comply with subpoenas and says he will order others to do so, this creates a constitutional crisis”"

 

Goddammit, you stupid *****, why wasn't this a constitutional crisis when Obama and Holder did it, then???  :wallbash:

 

 

suck up and kick down

 

one can base their scale at their own whim when a liberal

 

 

Posted
24 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

They're painting themselves into an interesting corner. The only way they're going to get any political use out of impeaching Trump will be if they do so around September or October of 2020. This allows them to lay out all their BS allegations, without allowing the Senate to hold/complete a trial before the 2020 election.

 

Any sooner, and the Democrats get their asses handed to them with the public support Trump will receive after the Senate trail shows that they're full of Schiff.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

"He added, “Here’s what I say, we’re confronting a constitutional crisis as I speak to you. As I look the people of America in the eye, I’m telling you, we have a constitutional crisis. the chief executive office of the president of the United States refuses to comply with subpoenas and says he will order others to do so, this creates a constitutional crisis”"

 

Goddammit, you stupid *****, why wasn't this a constitutional crisis when Obama and Holder did it, then???  :wallbash:

Do you really have to ask that question?

Posted
4 hours ago, Koko78 said:

 

I can accept that Mueller is trying to save his own ass, and that might explain why he was intentionally vague with the obstruction thing (the longer it goes, the more he keeps his name on everyone's lips - which keeps him from being a target.)

 

However, I don't think that he's a 'white hat', especially since he went out of his way to muddy the waters with the report. He's not a stupid man, he damn well knew that leaving the 'obstruction' question open-ended like he did would do nothing but inflame the situation and prolong the political nonsense. People wanted closure, one way or the other, and he went out of his way to insure that there was not going to be any.

 

 

Fair enough, but what I was getting at is what is he getting out of doing so? What's his endgame?

Bob Mueller is Mitt Romney’s spiritual twin. They’re both Never-Trumpers. Bob knows his pants and shoes are muddy. He did the maximum investigation possible even though it was apparent by the end of its first year that Trump was clean and they didn’t have a thing on him. 

 

Those bastards kept digging and digging all the while collecting their handsome pay and still came up with strunes. It must have been a boring hellish job to slog along like that and it had to be dispiriting knowing that they had nothing to show for their efforts after starting out so high and mighty leading the Lynch mob. 

 

I can can see why that pack of jackals slimed the final report like they did. It was the ONLY way they could continue besmirching the POTUS and his administration. 

 

May they all all rot in Hell. Mueller is no white hat. 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Hanging out with NCIS guys. :lol: 

 

 

 

You mean, Illya Kuryakin.

 

a"SPY"

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Koko78 said:

 

I can accept that Mueller is trying to save his own ass, and that might explain why he was intentionally vague with the obstruction thing (the longer it goes, the more he keeps his name on everyone's lips - which keeps him from being a target.)

 

However, I don't think that he's a 'white hat', especially since he went out of his way to muddy the waters with the report. He's not a stupid man, he damn well knew that leaving the 'obstruction' question open-ended like he did would do nothing but inflame the situation and prolong the political nonsense. People wanted closure, one way or the other, and he went out of his way to insure that there was not going to be any.

 

 

Fair enough, but what I was getting at is what is he getting out of doing so? What's his endgame?

Sorry, just has to...

image.png.ee45315d3eb20d67bbb74234220d90a6.png

Posted
46 minutes ago, Cinga said:

Sorry, just has to...

image.png.ee45315d3eb20d67bbb74234220d90a6.png

 

Mueller is trying to save me 15% or more on car insurance?!?

 

That mother *****!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Cinga said:

image.png.ee45315d3eb20d67bbb74234220d90a6.png

 

7 hours ago, Koko78 said:

 

Mueller is trying to save me 15% or more on car insurance?!?

 

That mother *****!

 

either that or he just tapped Brienne of Tarth

  • Haha (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...