Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

House Judiciary Committee votes to allow staffers to question AG Barr.

 

 

 

1554938421.gif

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, McGee Return TD said:

 

 

So the part where Barr stated the conclusions of Mueller that there was 'no collusion', and that the AG and DAG found 'no obstruction' after Mueller punted (on the legally dubious theory) were inaccurate because a summary of the summary did not contain the proper 'context'?

 

tenor.gif

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

Klobuchar up now, 2020 candidate... she promises to "bring us out of the weeds" then doubles down on conflating collusion/conspiracy with Russian meddling. 

 

When you don't have facts, go with innuendo. That's the way honest pols work, right?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Foxx said:

she is campaigning :lol:

 

It's amazing how much she's focused on obstruction -- considering how often she's made speeches claiming that treasonous collusion took place between Russia and Trump.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

****************

 

Mr. Sasse up now. He starts with Volume I and Russia. He asked Barr to talk about Deripaska and explain who he is. Barr says: 

 

"Id' rather not get into that in an open setting."

 

That's pretty big. 

  • Like (+1) 4
×
×
  • Create New...