Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 LOL Durbin trying to recharacterize that letter... 1
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: "This is all about Hillary's email again!" He's more prescient than he realizes -- but because he's so blisteringly dumb, he fails to see how that's REAL BAD for his side of the aisle. It's his staff (or the committee's dem staff rather) Where'd his staff get the letter? Did Barr just invent a new word: "acknowledgize?" 1 2
BeginnersMind Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Shocking...Durban is quoting a letter that went public less than 24 hours ago to impeach Barr's interpretation of the report. That should narrow down the leak - who's Durban working with? It’s not an OC-length letter. Probably only 3 sentences relevant.
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: LOL Durbin trying to recharacterize that letter... No, he's characterizing the letter exactly as the Post and NYT characterized it.
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, DC Tom said: Where'd his staff get the letter? That's what I'd like to know... I'm sure we will learn that answer in the coming weeks. 2
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, BeginnersMind said: It’s not an OC-length letter. Probably only 3 sentences relevant. It's the timing, not the content. It's not even a subtle set-up: Post and NYT break the news with a headline, set the narrative, push it in their morning editions, then Durban makes it the focus of his first question. 2
Foxx Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 Durbin...'i don't like your response so i'm going to choose to believe...'. 1
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: Boom! lol, Those darn emails "We just might do that..." 2 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 Dick: "After we take another look at Hillary Clinton's emails" Lindsay: "We might do that" Barr: {grin} LMAO 4
Tiberius Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 None that you are aware of? Oh bull, the Trump Towers meeting before the media reported it was something to hold over the president. His kissing up to Putin is suspicious looking to say the least 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 Now Mike Lee is up. He's also pounding the same things, Clinton, FISA warrants, etc. 1
LB3 Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Posting for the image not the meme -- but that was his expression as Feinstein read her (Chinese approved) talking points. Has SNL gotten John Goodman to play Barr yet? 4
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: Has SNL gotten John Goodman to play Barr yet? Oh, that would be a good one. Same jowls. 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 That was a VERY interesting answer by Barr. He said people assume the only intelligence collection was done by one FISA (on Page) and one informant. He thinks there was more and is looking into it. There was more. It was illegal, Barr knows it. And it's going to come out. 2 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 Barr says he doesn't want to talk too deeply about FISA because of the ongoing OIG investigation. 4 1
Foxx Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: "FISA issue currently underway by the OIG" the findings can't comes soon enough. break after Whitehouse. good, i'm hungry! Edited May 1, 2019 by Foxx 1
Recommended Posts