Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

Is there anyone on this committee who isn't a senile old fart?  

 

This is like watching a resident meeting at my grandmother's assisted living facility.

 

longetivity means you get to lead Committees

 

Maxine Waters is around for decades to chair many important things from her part of Congress...

 

that's the beauty of the US system, the Senate slows down the pace of frivilous change, Richard Russell ran the 20th century under mostly shadow

 

 

Edited by row_33
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Barr almost got Leahy to agree that Trump did nothing wrong. :lol: 

 

He's not taking any *****. 

Leahy is mischaracterizing the report (per the Democrat talking points (trying to form their narrative)) and Barr is not letting him get away with it.

Edited by Foxx
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

Leahy is trying really hard to play word games that really don't matter.

 

 

he must be 90 years old now?  not a shred of usefulness out of his piehole the whole time

 

 

 

 

Posted (edited)

Lee  Cornyn (sorry) wants more on Clinton.



hahahaha! "Why didn't the Obama administration do more to investigate..."

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

Cornyn asking about why the FBI didn't offer a defensive briefing for Trump. This is a key question as it speaks to the motivation of those running the FBI investigation at the time. They were not trying to protect the country, they were trying to stop Trump.

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted

This is complete nonsense that Barr and the Republicans are shilling that the Mueller report cleared the Trump campaign of conspiracy. The report is very clear that they couldn't conclusively prove it with enough evidence. That's like saying Al Capone wasn't a bootlegger because he was never convicted of it. BS! 

Posted

Shocking...Durban is quoting a letter that went public less than 24 hours ago to impeach Barr's interpretation of the report.

 

That should narrow down the leak - who's Durban working with?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:

Dick Durbin... aptly named. 

 

"This is all about Hillary's email again!"

 

He's more prescient than he realizes -- but because he's so blisteringly dumb, he fails to see how that's REAL BAD for his side of the aisle. 

Just now, DC Tom said:

Shocking...Durban is quoting a letter that went public less than 24 hours ago to impeach Barr's interpretation of the report.

 

That should narrow down the leak - who's Durban working with?

 

It's his staff (or the committee's dem staff rather)

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Durbin getting destroyed same as Leahy on the same talking point they're trying to push..

Edited by Foxx
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, DC Tom said:

Shocking...Durban is quoting a letter that went public less than 24 hours ago to impeach Barr's interpretation of the report.

 

That should narrow down the leak - who's Durban working with?

No, he's asking about his answer to a question about it. 

 

You are crying about a leak? Oh brother 

×
×
  • Create New...