Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

Several problems with the coup conspiracy

1 for all the Page/Stroczk/Mccabe/Ohr/Comey problems that are claimed, what did they actually do to prevent Trumps election?  If all of these supposed powerful people wanted to ruin Trumps candidacy, why didn’t they?   If anything, DOJ/FBI players hurt Clinton. An active attempt to stop Trump would have included actions versus just typing suspicious things in assumed private texts

 

2 way too many conspirators. No one would conspire in a several hundred person conspiracy that could get them hung if discovered. Why wouldn’t some inquisitive Jimmy Olsen type blow the lid off the whole thing for fame or fortune?

 

3. What I saw with Rosenstein and McCabe discussing the possibility of Pence and the Cabinet removing Trump was not unreasonable nor was it a coup attempt. It seems that is was a discussion of the legal, constitutional path. If Trump were removed through a constitutional path, that would imply the exact opposite of a coup

thank you for your thoughtful reply.

 

the only thing i would only say, is to read DR's response and give it some thought. anything i would add would not do justice to his response.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

When Trump won, that's when the plan turned into a coup. They HAD to launch a coup because each and every one of them - including Obama himself - were now open and exposed to serious legal peril because of the crimes they had been committing inside the DOJ/FBI against their political opposition. Not just Trump - but every campaign in 2016 was under their watch. And likely every campaign in 2014, 2012, 2010, 2008... 

 

That doesn't make any sense.  Let's assume for a second that these people were in potential legal trouble for the reasons you laid out. How does removing Trump from office save them?  Pence becomes president, the executive branch is still in Republican hands, and the supposed sting operation to catch them would still be in full effect.  Removing Trump stops none of that.  

 

Unless you think Pence is part of the deep state too, this was all just politics as normal.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Capco said:

 

That doesn't make any sense.  Let's assume for a second that these people were in potential legal trouble for the reasons you laid out. How does removing Trump from office save them?  Pence becomes president, the executive branch is still in Republican hands, and the supposed sting operation to catch them would still be in full effect.  Removing Trump stops none of that.  

 

Unless you think Pence is part of the deep state too, this was all just politics as normal.  

 

;) Now you're thinking.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Capco said:

 

That doesn't make any sense.  Let's assume for a second that these people were in potential legal trouble for the reasons you laid out. How does removing Trump from office save them?  Pence becomes president, the executive branch is still in Republican hands, and the supposed sting operation to catch them would still be in full effect.  Removing Trump stops none of that.  

 

Unless you think Pence is part of the deep state too, this was all just politics as normal.  

 

I think it would go something like: put Trump in as much political and perhaps legal jeopardy as they could, and then cut a deal with him so that he backs off on the retribution.    

 

No comment on Pence.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

I think it would go something like: put Trump in as much political and perhaps legal jeopardy as they could, and then cut a deal with him so that he backs off on the retribution.    

 

No comment on Pence.

 

 

Whether or not Pence is "deep state" is something I'm not even sure of. But he's not Trump, and likely heavily compromised. If they got rid of Trump, and Pence wasn't DS, then they'd get him out too... 

 

... And who takes over then? 

 

Speaker of the House who was Paul Ryan - a very compromised deep stater.

Posted
2 hours ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

LOL

 

He had 2 years, all the resources in the world, high priced all democratic leaning lawyers, access to anything and everything but ANOTHER investigation will find something.

 

Obviously you are either 1) too emotionally involved and can't face reality or 2) you are a dullard

 

Mueller actually did a good job in keeping it closely-held, i will say that for him

 

 

2 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

The TDS people in Congress and the MSM are insisting that Mueller's report be handed over or released in its entirety. It's a red herring. They know damn well that some things will have to be redacted or Barr's report will leave them out for legal reasons. This is their way of discrediting Mueller's report, all for the sake of saying that bad things are being hidden. Has it ever been more apparent that theseshits care more about their politics than their country?

 

they can join the flat-earthers

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

You can't indict a sitting president. If you could he would already be indicted for paying hush money to a porn star. Love your conspiracy minded nonsense though. 

 

Sure you can indict a sitting President.

 

Nixon and Slick Willie made it the closest it could get.

 

 

 

Posted
20 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

I think it would go something like: put Trump in as much political and perhaps legal jeopardy as they could, and then cut a deal with him so that he backs off on the retribution.    

 

No comment on Pence.

 

that is exactly why Pelosi took impeachment off the table.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Foxx said:

that is exactly why Pelosi took impeachment off the table.

 

Pelosi knows what a dead end that all is.

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That should scare the hell out of anyone who's been pushing this lie. 

 

 

 

:lol:  He's such a child.

Posted
4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

:lol:  He's such a child.

 

Which is why his silence on this topic should be chilling. 

 

You know he's going to hit back. And hit back hard. If all he had left were words, he'd be tweeting up a storm by now. But he knows he has much more than just words. He has them dead to rights on criminal acts. And now the only roadblock preventing that information from coming out to the public at large has been removed. 

 

... And Trump's silent. 

 

 

029009c251d3038b0eff85faf0b730039e200560c107a6233fb485a84fb8f1ec.jpg

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted

 

Best. Meltdown. Ever. 

 

:lol: 

 

No one should take this man seriously ever again. He lied. He knew he was lying while he was doing it - but did it anyway. Not because he was driven by concern for the country, but because he's a lying asshat who does not serve the people. He serves himself and others who look down on the people. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Best. Meltdown. Ever. 

 

:lol: 

 

No one should take this man seriously ever again. He lied. He knew he was lying while he was doing it - but did it anyway. Not because he was driven by concern for the country, but because he's a lying asshat who does not serve the people. He serves himself and others who look down on the people. 

 


Who took him seriously after his leg tingled over Obama?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Who took him seriously after his leg tingled over Obama?

i dunno. but i have heard that his other legs were jealous.

×
×
  • Create New...