/dev/null Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 10 minutes ago, bilzfancy said: How can there be obstruction when there was no crime? How can there be obstruction when Trump and the WH gave the investigators everything they asked for, interviewed everyone they wanted to? 1 2
Chef Jim Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 2 hours ago, Foxx said: one of @Tiberius heroes. https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1118693733594218501 Holy ***** dude was a fat *****. That's all I got. Carry on kids. 3
GG Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 23 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Holy ***** dude was a fat *****. That's all I got. Carry on kids. Yes he was. Was bigger when you saw him in person.
DC Tom Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 1 hour ago, BeginnersMind said: The president lied, directed others to lie and mislead, attempted to block the investigation, and only his role as president stopped an obstruction charge. But PPP focuses on so much winning. Don’t stop believing the fairy tale kids. This was not a good report for Trump. He’s just convinced you it is. And the report also said he cooperated completely. Huh. Go figure. 2
BeginnersMind Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 2 hours ago, bilzfancy said: How can there be obstruction when there was no crime? Read the report. Read the statute. Your question shows a lack of legal understanding. 2 hours ago, bilzfancy said: How can there be obstruction when Trump and the WH gave the investigators everything they asked for, interviewed everyone they wanted to? See above and read the report. 2 hours ago, Bray Wyatt said: This sounds angry, are you ok? Sure. Trump has been pretty effective on many fronts but is a huge disappointment in character and judgment, as this report shows. And im much more concerned about the winner in all this: Russia. 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: Read the report. Read the statute. Your question shows a lack of legal understanding. See above and read the report. Sure. Trump has been pretty effective on many fronts but is a huge disappointment in character and judgment, as this report shows. And im much more concerned about the winner in all this: Russia. I stick up for you a lot, but I swear ... sometimes you are just trollin'. There can be no other explanation. 2 1
njbuff Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: Read the report. Read the statute. Your question shows a lack of legal understanding. See above and read the report. Sure. Trump has been pretty effective on many fronts but is a huge disappointment in character and judgment, as this report shows. And im much more concerned about the winner in all this: Russia. That's on the Democrats, who started a phony investigation ONLY because their lovechild Killary Clinot lost in a fair and square election. Nothing more, nothing less. Time for the Dumbs to put up a candidate that is worth while to beat Trump which won't happen. Tulsi Gabbard is the only Democrat who is sane, but she will NEVER get the nomination because she is exactly that......... SANE.
Nanker Posted April 19, 2019 Author Posted April 19, 2019 (edited) BM please go rob a store and make sure you get a six pack of Mad Dog 4040. I’ll wait for you in the parking lot. We’ll have a good time. You going to do it? No? Did I commit a crime? Asking for a friend. Edited April 19, 2019 by Nanker 2
LB3 Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 BM totally isn't a shill. He's definitely middle of the road, all about the facts guy. He's totally not melting down. He's absolutely not sounding like Rachel Maddow now. 1 1
BeginnersMind Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 13 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I stick up for you a lot, but I swear ... sometimes you are just trollin'. There can be no other explanation. You can obstruct without guilt guilt of an underlying crime. This is not a deep legal concept. If I feel like trolling, you’ll know it. I’m just saddened by the tolerance for POTUS’s behavior very clearly delineated in this report. The blind eye most here turn to it is willful. Just now, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: BM totally isn't a shill. He's definitely middle of the road, all about the facts guy. He's totally not melting down. He's absolutely not sounding like Rachel Maddow now. Remember when I said there was collusion? Yeah. Me either. But I do remember saying the opposite over and over again. Back to your pod Borg.
snafu Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 Hey y'all, I was driving from Long Island to Buffalo all day. Did anything big happen today that I should know about? 3
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 9 minutes ago, snafu said: Hey y'all, I was driving from Long Island to Buffalo all day. Did anything big happen today that I should know about? It was a pretty quiet day. ? Holy Week and all. 2 1
njbuff Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 The Demonrats reaction is quite predictable and quite laughable. Nothing but a bunch of mummies with no brains whatsoever. Like I said, is there anything more predictable.
snafu Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I don't like this switching from third person to first person. He should be more like Ricky Henderson and be consistent. 2
4merper4mer Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 2 hours ago, BeginnersMind said: Read the report. Read the statute. Your question shows a lack of legal understanding. See above and read the report. Sure. Trump has been pretty effective on many fronts but is a huge disappointment in character and judgment, as this report shows. And im much more concerned about the winner in all this: Russia. The law states republicans must BOHICA when Hillary declares it to be so. 1
Doc Brown Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 This is probably the most accurate take with what I've seen in the report so far. Pretty much every statement or tweet by Trump would make a normal person seem guilty as hell, but Trump's not a normal person.
DC Tom Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 2 hours ago, BeginnersMind said: Read the report. Read the statute. Your question shows a lack of legal understanding. And where'd you get your law degree? Don't answer - it's a rhetorical question. If you answer it, I might be forced to consider exerting the effort to think about ignoring you, and I don't want to waste even that much time on you.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 17 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: This is probably the most accurate take with what I've seen in the report so far. Pretty much every statement or tweet by Trump would make a normal person seem guilty as hell, but Trump's not a normal person. Or, every statement and tweet can be understood as a man (w an ego and narcissism issues) who knew he was innocent loudly proclaiming so against (almost literally) every major news outlet who were not only accusing him of crimes he knew he didn't commit - but saying he did them. 2
Recommended Posts