Tiberius Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 21 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: The bolded is WHY it's not a believable story. These people know Trump takes everything personally. So why go to the press to highlight your disloyalty? That only assures that Trump will go looking for disloyalty, it doesn't assuage anything. Common sense. Try using it, you'll be amazed at how easy it becomes to spot bullshite stories like this when you do Who says they are trying to assuage anything?? Reporters reporting on the nervousness inside the WH.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Who says they are trying to assuage anything?? Reporters reporting on the nervousness inside the WH. Put yourself in their shoes. Let's say you work in the White House. Let's say you spoke out against Trump to Mueller and now you're fearful of what Trump will do when he finds out what you said... Do you: a) Go to the press for comfort and put a spotlight on you in order to make it easier for Trump to find you? or b) Keep your mouth shut? No one, and I mean no one, would choose a. The story is fake.
Tiberius Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Put yourself in their shoes. Let's say you work in the White House. Let's say you spoke out against Trump to Mueller and now you're fearful of what Trump will do when he finds out what you said... Do you: a) Go to the press for comfort and put a spotlight on you in order to make it easier for Trump to find you? or b) Keep your mouth shut? No one, and I mean no one, would choose a. The story is fake. No one keeps their mouth shut in this administration! Come on! They talked and are worried about it. I love it!
Nanker Posted April 16, 2019 Author Posted April 16, 2019 There was NO COLLUSION. There can’t be “obstruction of justice” either. Obstruction of just happens in a criminal investigation or trial. The investigation into the Trump campaign was “counter intelligence” which is done on behalf of and for the protection of the President of the United States. Counter intelligence ops are directed by the POTUS and he can turn them off like a water faucet. 1
reddogblitz Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: 2) Trump reading the report?? HA HA HA HA!! That's a good one! OK, Ivanka read it to him while she was sitting on his lap. Better? 2
Tiberius Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 1 hour ago, reddogblitz said: OK, Ivanka read it to him while she was sitting on his lap. Better? Lol, from all the reporting we have, he does not pay any attention to briefings. So, probably not better. But funny! 1
Uncle Joe Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 5 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: <snip> That's like a thief committing a crime, then calling the press to complain they're afraid the cops will figure out they did it and how unfair it is. It's not something a rational person would ever do. This is a fake story. All it takes to identify it as such is common sense - hence why I always say the only way to survive this (dis)information war is to hone your own discernment in order to be able to see through the obvious bull like this. The Jussie Smollette Syndrome? 1
Foxx Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 https://twitter.com/BreakingNLive/status/1118260359226380289 2
Doc Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 2 hours ago, Nanker said: There was NO COLLUSION. There can’t be “obstruction of justice” either. Obstruction of just happens in a criminal investigation or trial. The investigation into the Trump campaign was “counter intelligence” which is done on behalf of and for the protection of the President of the United States. Counter intelligence ops are directed by the POTUS and he can turn them off like a water faucet. Was Mueller somehow prevented from fully investigating the Trump-Russia collusion case? If not, there was no obstruction.
Koko78 Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, Doc said: Was Mueller somehow prevented from fully investigating the Trump-Russia collusion case? If not, there was no obstruction. The allegation isn't that Trump obstructed Mueller, but that somehow he obstructed Comey by asking him to take it easy on Flynn, and firing him for being a total douchnozzle asshat lying swamp creature.
SoCal Deek Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 An innocent person cannot obstruct ‘justice’. In the United States we call that defending yourself. And oddly enough if you cannot afford a defense the government will appoint and pay someone to defend you.
Foxx Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 thread. a lot of info we already know about, some stuff that unfolded after Barr was confirmed and some happenings on the Ukraine front that is important. https://twitter.com/EpochTimes/status/1118260280583127041 1 2
Tiberius Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 51 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: An innocent person cannot obstruct ‘justice’. In the United States we call that defending yourself. And oddly enough if you cannot afford a defense the government will appoint and pay someone to defend you. No, but a guilty person can prevent the truth from coming out.
Hedge Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 21 minutes ago, Foxx said: thread. a lot of info we already know about, some stuff that unfolded after Barr was confirmed and some happenings on the Ukraine front that is important. https://twitter.com/EpochTimes/status/1118260280583127041 That's a great synopsis of recent activity. I've added a new section for Notable Twitter Threads to the OP in the Initial Sources to Provide to Those Waking Up to the Truth Thread 2
Cinga Posted April 17, 2019 Posted April 17, 2019 9 hours ago, Tiberius said: No one keeps their mouth shut in this administration! Come on! They talked and are worried about it. I love it! Yeah!!! I heard the kitchen bus boy speaks Russian too!
BeginnersMind Posted April 17, 2019 Posted April 17, 2019 11 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: An innocent person cannot obstruct ‘justice’. Not true.
Nanker Posted April 17, 2019 Author Posted April 17, 2019 A President cannot obstruct a counter intelligence investigation.
row_33 Posted April 17, 2019 Posted April 17, 2019 15 minutes ago, Nanker said: A President cannot obstruct a counter intelligence investigation. Sure one could. Trump didn’t.
Nanker Posted April 17, 2019 Author Posted April 17, 2019 Nope. Counter intelligence investigations are run by and for the President. Obama shut down the investigation of the ISIS drug running in South America. Nothing happened.
Recommended Posts