row_33 Posted April 15, 2019 Posted April 15, 2019 6 hours ago, Koko78 said: You darn well know that the liberal narrative will be that, 'the report is worthless because of the redactions hiding the real proof of Trump being an evil obstructing colluder, therefore no one should read the report! Anyone who does is a racist, bigoted, xenophobic, homophobic, Islamophobic actual literal super mecha-Nazi.' good thing their views carry no more weight than people want to waste on it
Foxx Posted April 15, 2019 Posted April 15, 2019 11 minutes ago, Hedge said: umm... Schiff's, Nadler's, Schumer's and Pelosi's balls? 4
Tiberius Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 18 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) on Sunday dismissed any of the potential findings that could be revealed from special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation, saying that "we can just burn" his final report. "You know, we can just burn it up. It is a partisan document," Nunes said on "Fox & Friends Weekend" just days after Mueller delivered his final report on the investigation into Russian interference and possible collusion between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/435513-nunes-on-mueller-report-we-can-just-burn-it-up Partisan document?
Foxx Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 (edited) https://twitter.com/carterwpage/status/1117581993049563136 Edited April 16, 2019 by Foxx 1
Tiberius Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 13 hours ago, Foxx said: umm... Schiff's, Nadler's, Schumer's and Pelosi's balls? You mean the people who won their elections without Russian help? "I love WikiLeaks!"
Q-baby! Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You mean the people who won their elections without Russian help? "I love WikiLeaks!" Love WikiLeaks! It’s a treasure trove! It’s unbelievable! 1
Tiberius Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 Multiple current and former White House officials-turned-witnesses for Special Counsel Robert Mueller are fretting that their identities will be exposed in the full report, outing them as the sources of damning information about President Donald Trump. According to an NBC News report, many of them have contacted the Justice Department to determine if their names, or at least obvious clues about their identities, will be redacted from the report. The DOJ has reportedly stayed mum. An NBC source close to the White House reported “breakdown-level anxiety” among those who shared information with Mueller. The witnesses are parsing phrases spoken by Attorney General William Barr that information about “peripheral third parties” could be redacted if it would “infringe on the personal privacy.” But for now, the witnesses, like everyone else, will have to wait until Thursday to read all about it. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/white-house-officials-breakdown-level-anixety-mueller-report-show-ratted-trump
Doc Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 52 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Multiple current and former White House officials-turned-witnesses for Special Counsel Robert Mueller are fretting that their identities will be exposed in the full report, outing them as the sources of damning information about President Donald Trump. According to an NBC News report, many of them have contacted the Justice Department to determine if their names, or at least obvious clues about their identities, will be redacted from the report. The DOJ has reportedly stayed mum. An NBC source close to the White House reported “breakdown-level anxiety” among those who shared information with Mueller. The witnesses are parsing phrases spoken by Attorney General William Barr that information about “peripheral third parties” could be redacted if it would “infringe on the personal privacy.” But for now, the witnesses, like everyone else, will have to wait until Thursday to read all about it. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/white-house-officials-breakdown-level-anixety-mueller-report-show-ratted-trump "Damning information" that's bogus? Yeah, maybe their names should be made known.
KRC Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 4 minutes ago, Doc said: "Damning information" that's bogus? Yeah, maybe their names should be made known. It's hard to keep up. "We want the full report released unredacted!!" is now "Well, maybe not ALL of the report. Just parts of it."
Tiberius Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 33 minutes ago, KRC said: It's hard to keep up. "We want the full report released unredacted!!" is now "Well, maybe not ALL of the report. Just parts of it." It is hard for you to keep up moron. This is Trump's people not wanting it out, again
Deranged Rhino Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Multiple current and former White House officials-turned-witnesses for Special Counsel Robert Mueller are fretting that their identities will be exposed in the full report, outing them as the sources of damning information about President Donald Trump.ad all about it. Key sign that this is fake news, Tibs... These "officials" are fretting about the public finding out? Nah. They'd fear Trump finding out. But, Trump has every right (and likely will/has) to read the unredacted version in full - which means that ship has already sailed, there would be no reason for any official to go to the press to fret about the report being released over concerns about what Trump will learn they said. This is a nonsense story. The second big sign that this is a fake story: it's from NBC. 1
Tiberius Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Key sign that this is fake news, Tibs... These "officials" are fretting about the public finding out? Nah. They'd fear Trump finding out. But, Trump has every right (and likely will/has) to read the unredacted version in full - which means that ship has already sailed, there would be no reason for any official to go to the press to fret about the report being released over concerns about what Trump will learn they said. This is a nonsense story. The second big sign that this is a fake story: it's from NBC. 1) Yes, I agree they don't want Trump finding out, that's not really a point to quibble over. 2) Trump reading the report?? HA HA HA HA!! That's a good one! 3) You are a Trump supporter calling some other organization a lair. I mean, come on?
KRC Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: It is hard for you to keep up moron. This is Trump's people not wanting it out, again Taking a break your Klan meeting, racist?
Deranged Rhino Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: 1) Yes, I agree they don't want Trump finding out, that's not really a point to quibble over. I was agreeing with you on that point. But it's too late, that ship has sailed the moment they spoke to Mueller. They would know this too - which is why this story is fundamentally untrue/fake. 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: 2) Trump reading the report?? HA HA HA HA!! That's a good one! This is called logic, Tibs: IF they fear Trump finding out - WHY would they go to the press to announce their fears when they know Trump can (and will) read the full report unredacted? That's like a thief committing a crime, then calling the press to complain they're afraid the cops will figure out they did it and how unfair it is. It's not something a rational person would ever do. This is a fake story. All it takes to identify it as such is common sense - hence why I always say the only way to survive this (dis)information war is to hone your own discernment in order to be able to see through the obvious bull like this. 1
Tiberius Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I was agreeing with you on that point. But it's too late, that ship has sailed the moment they spoke to Mueller. They would know this too - which is why this story is fundamentally untrue/fake. This is called logic, Tibs: IF they fear Trump finding out - WHY would they go to the press to announce their fears when they know Trump can (and will) read the full report unredacted? That's like a thief committing a crime, then calling the press to complain they're afraid the cops will figure out they did it and how unfair it is. It's not something a rational person would ever do. This is a fake story. All it takes to identify it as such is common sense - hence why I always say the only way to survive this (dis)information war is to hone your own discernment in order to be able to see through the obvious bull like this. Trump isn't going to read anything. They didn't announce anything, they spoke to a reporter about it. They spoke about their fears. That's different. It's a very believable story. Trump takes everything too personally. He demands loyalty Just now, BigMcD said: Only trusted source is Twitter! And WikiLeaks! 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I was agreeing with you on that point. But it's too late, that ship has sailed the moment they spoke to Mueller. They would know this too - which is why this story is fundamentally untrue/fake. This is called logic, Tibs: IF they fear Trump finding out - WHY would they go to the press to announce their fears when they know Trump can (and will) read the full report unredacted? That's like a thief committing a crime, then calling the press to complain they're afraid the cops will figure out they did it and how unfair it is. It's not something a rational person would ever do. This is a fake story. All it takes to identify it as such is common sense - hence why I always say the only way to survive this (dis)information war is to hone your own discernment in order to be able to see through the obvious bull like this. Those attempting to do harm to the country by leaking inaccurate information should get the boot and good riddance. If their actions are criminal, pursue them like any other criminal. I'd think that wise regardless of who is president, even if it was Hillary, which it's not, because she lost badly. You are correct as usual. More bogus reporting about bogus fears designed to draw attention away from the main issues. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: Trump isn't going to read anything. They didn't announce anything, they spoke to a reporter about it. They spoke about their fears. That's different. It's a very believable story. Trump takes everything too personally. He demands loyalty The bolded is WHY it's not a believable story. These people know Trump takes everything personally. So why go to the press to highlight your disloyalty? That only assures that Trump will go looking for disloyalty, it doesn't assuage anything. Common sense. Try using it, you'll be amazed at how easy it becomes to spot bullshite stories like this when you do
Deranged Rhino Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 Don't worry, ya'll, when you want high caliber analysis on the Mueller report, Seth Meyers has your back. 2
Recommended Posts