Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

The most watched doorstep in the world, in the heart of London (the leading CCTV covered city on the planet) -- and world class RUSSIAN hackers were going in and out at "critical moments"... 

 

... And no one got a picture. Or video. Or reported on the story until three years later

Image result for uhhh what? gif

 

Congrats. You've now graduated to level four tinfoil hat! 

 

Image result for new tinfoil hat gif

 

:beer: 

The question that has to be asked: Why were they hand delivered?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, 3rdnlng said:

The question that has to be asked: Why were they hand delivered?

 

And why was a private intelligence firm, from Spain, the only one to report on this... 

 

Not MI6, MI5, GCHQ -- let alone CIA, NSA, or the FBI all whom had agents there (multiple times) specifically hunting for Russian spooks. 

 

Yet one firm. Privately owned (by whom? worth a dig), compiles this evidence -- then sits on it for three years, only to hand it to... CNN. Not an intel agency or LEO... CNN. 

 

 

 

For reference -- when I was in London last year hunting down Hakluyt leads I walked past the embassy half a dozen times just to get a sense of the eyes on it. They had plainclothes officers/cops (at least four I could see) standing/walking around the block plus at least two cars sitting right outside with press/paparazzi waiting to take pictures of anyone entering or even lingering. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

...plus at least two cars sitting right outside with press/paparazzi waiting to take pictures of anyone entering or even lingering. 

 

Did you at least have the common decency to open up your trench coat and give them a show?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

Did you at least have the common decency to open up your trench coat and give them a show?

 

I thought about it -- but they told me they didn't have a telescopic lens.

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

 

Shame on Robert Mueller—Again

by Conrad Black

 

Original Article

 

Nowhere is the collapse of the Democratic Party as a coherent political organization more evident than in the astounding metamorphosis of Robert Mueller. He returned to public notice as special counsel and was instantly heralded by the Democratic media as a virtual Douglas MacArthur of selfless national duty, precisely the sort of rigorous, incorruptible, no-nonsense public servant who would tear the Trump fraud of corruption and artificiality, dirty tricks, shady accounting, and outrageous misbehavior apart and expose the whole rotten mess that had, by nightmarish mischance, moved into the White House (where the Clinton pay-to-play casino should already have been installed).

 

 

.

Posted
1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Documents Reveal Obama State Department Advanced Russian Collusion Hoax Before 2016 Election

by Matt Margolis

Original Article

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

Funny how stuff like this happens during an Administration that never had one scandal or even a smidgen of corruption (that we were allowed to know about)

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

 

 

Funny how stuff like this happens during an Administration that never had one scandal or even a smidgen of corruption (that we were allowed to know about)

 

I’m grateful it was just internet nonsense, back in the day the USSR had presence in all departments and a Vice President simpleminded enough to think it was a good option

 

 

Posted
On 7/20/2019 at 9:29 AM, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Documents Reveal Obama State Department Advanced Russian Collusion Hoax Before 2016 Election

by Matt Margolis

Original Article

 

 

 

 

.

 

Quote

 Included in the documents is “a September 2016 email exchange between then-Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and Special Coordinator for Libya Jonathan Winer, a close associate of dossier author Christopher Steele, discussing a ‘face-to-face’ meeting on a ‘Russian matter.’”

 

Hmmm.  Rather convenient Stevens was out of the way, wasn't it?  

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

The vast majority of which had zero chance to pass the Senate... sooooo, that's pretty meaningless. 

 

wah wah wah - you're posting lies again - they have you where they want you - in their pocket doing their bidding - lying on their behalf.

Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

It's not a lie to say that the vast majority of the House Bills weren't able to pass the senate. That's a fact. Sorry. You're wrong. Again. 

 

"House Democrats have failed to govern. Instead of legislating, they’re relitigating a closed investigation."

 

Nope - they've passed over 100 bills. 

 

You've been had

 

They own you

Posted

How many of those bills became law? How many were passed by the Senate? 

 

This is lazy spin even by your standards. You're wrong. Again. And underlining your error by doubling down on dishonesty.  

 

(Time for another screenname change)

×
×
  • Create New...