Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

THE MUELLER REPORT REVISITED

FTA:

 

• The Mueller report’s qualified language reflects lack of certainty whether Russian intelligence officers stole Democratic Party emails, or how those emails were transferred to Wikileaks.

 

• The report’s timeline of events appears to defy logic. According to its narrative, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange announced the publication of Democratic Party emails not only before he received the documents but before he even communicated with the source that provided them.

 

• There is strong reason to doubt Mueller’s suggestion that an alleged Russian cutout called Guccifer 2.0 supplied the stolen Democratic Party emails to Assange.

 

• Mueller’s decision not to interview Assange – a central figure who claims Russia was not behind the hack – suggests an unwillingness to explore avenues of evidence on fundamental questions.

 

• U.S. intelligence officials cannot make definitive conclusions about the hacking of Democratic National Committee computer servers because they did not analyze those servers themselves. Instead, they relied on the forensics of CrowdStrike, a private contractor for the DNC. It was not a neutral party, much as dossier compiler Christopher Steele, also a DNC contractor, was not a neutral party.

 

• Mueller’s report conspicuously does not allege that the Russian government carried out a nefarious social media campaign. Instead it blames “a private Russian entity” known as the Internet Research Agency. 

 

• Then CIA Director John Brennan played a seminal and overlooked role in all facets of what became Mueller’s investigation: the suspicions that triggered the initial collusion probe; the allegations of Russian interference; and the intelligence assessment that purported to validate those allegations, which Brennan himself helped generate. Yet Brennan has since revealed himself to be, like CrowdStrike and Steele, a partisan with a deep animus toward Trump.

 

More at the link:

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted

The entire DNC email hacking is an overblown story. I follow this stuff pretty closely and don’t recall ANYTHING that cam out of that ‘theft’ that anything to do with anything in the election. Does anyone?

Posted
Just now, SoCal Deek said:

The entire DNC email hacking is an overblown story. I follow this stuff pretty closely and don’t recall ANYTHING that cam out of that ‘theft’ that anything to do with anything in the election. Does anyone?

 

The media or left never wants to talk about the content of the emails released and the corruption they exposed because they know they can't defend it. So instead they focused on the "hack" (while preventing the FBI from doing a proper investigation into said leak ... I mean "hack") and how just releasing stolen information, true or not, was cheating! 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

Next time they shouldn’t have old farts like Podesta and Clinton using PASSWORD as their actual password. ?

 

Oh come on, give them some credit - they were smarter than that! They used PASSWORD123.  Whaddya think they are, dumb or something?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

Oh come on, give them some credit - they were smarter than that! They used PASSWORD123.  Whaddya think they are, dumb or something?

I think is all pretty hilarious. I guarantee you that the whole Hilary email server thing is because her generation has ZERO idea how all of this technology actually works.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

I think is all pretty hilarious. I guarantee you that the whole Hilary email server thing is because her generation has ZERO idea how all of this technology actually works.

 

And she has to feel every transaction with another person is cheating them for an advantage

 

 

Edited by row_33
Posted

 

Why read it when they can lie about it and push rumor, falsehood, and innuendo as they've done for three plus years of lying to the world about Trump/Russia conspiracy. 

 

(Awfully quiet down here from the LOUD voices proclaiming this was all real just a year ago... they'll be continuing to hide as the summer progresses)

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

FALSE. 

 

Trump "survived Mueller" because he did not collude or conspire with Russia and is not a Russian agent as her network has pushed for 3 years without facts to support it

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
16 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

FALSE. 

 

Trump "survived Mueller" because he did not collude or conspire with Russia and is not a Russian agent as her network has pushed for 3 years without facts to support it

 

 

 

 

It is a pretty big ask to have them actually do their jobs.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, KRC said:

 

 

It is a pretty big ask to have them actually do their jobs.

 

getting ad $$$ and personal attention is their jobs

 

Posted
7 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:
 

 

 

Of course that's what's going to happen.  Mueller's not stupid. 

 

They're realizing this now?  That's...actually more perceptive than I expected from them.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, KRC said:

 

 

It is a pretty big ask to have them actually do their jobs.

 

Agree.  The Mueller report is only fractionally as tedious as many of the bills they pass or don't pass, but they don't read those either. 

Edited by keepthefaith
Posted

Stolen election. On top of the hacking of election systems and equipment, Trump's "I love Wikileaks!!" Comments were about this: 

 

 

 

Atlanta (CNN)New documents obtained exclusively by CNN reveal that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange received in-person deliveries, potentially of hacked materials related to the 2016 US election, during a series of suspicious meetings at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. 

The documents build on the possibility, raised by special counsel Robert Mueller in his report on Russian meddling, that couriers brought hacked files to Assange at the embassy.
The surveillance reports also describe how Assange turned the embassy into a command center and orchestrated a series of damaging disclosures that rocked the 2016 presidential campaign in the United States.
Despite being confined to the embassy while seeking safe passage to Ecuador, Assange met with Russians and world-class hackers at critical moments, frequently for hours at a time. He also acquired powerful new computing and network hardware to facilitate data transfers just weeks before WikiLeaks received hacked materials from Russian operatives.
These stunning details come from hundreds of surveillance reports compiled for the Ecuadorian government by UC Global, a private Spanish security company, and obtained by CNN. They chronicle Assange's movements and provide an unprecedented window into his life at the embassy. They also add a new dimension to the Mueller report, which cataloged how WikiLeaks helped the Russians undermine the US election.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/15/politics/assange-embassy-exclusive-documents/index.html

On 7/8/2019 at 10:21 AM, SoCal Deek said:

The entire DNC email hacking is an overblown story. I follow this stuff pretty closely and don’t recall ANYTHING that cam out of that ‘theft’ that anything to do with anything in the election. Does anyone?

Oh ya, they weaponized the stolen material and used to bash Clinton with. This is basic information. How can you say you follow this and not know that? 

Posted

The most watched doorstep in the world, in the heart of London (the leading CCTV covered city on the planet) -- and world class RUSSIAN hackers were going in and out at "critical moments"... 

 

... And no one got a picture. Or video. Or reported on the story until three years later

Image result for uhhh what? gif

 

Congrats. You've now graduated to level four tinfoil hat! 

 

Image result for new tinfoil hat gif

 

:beer: 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...