Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Right after being fired - Comey leaked his notes through his professor friend.  Knowing what we know now, Comey's interactions with the President and others have not aged well at all.   Comey is asked by the President about leaks, McCabe, Flynn, and others and he's clearly not honest or forthcoming with the President especially with Comey knowing very well about the Page FISA and FBI surveillance, the entire Dossier and its origins, various leaks originating from the FBI and several other circumstances surrounding the Russian hoax.   Comey should realize now in hindsight that Trump in the moment of their meetings knew some things, asked for answers and knew Comey was bullshitting him.  Comey defends McCabe who was running the Trump campaign surveillance, leaked and handled the Dossier.  Trump and Reince were testing Comey.  Comey has stated that he leaked his notes in part to increase the chances that a special counsel be appointed.  Sessions caved under the pressure.  It (the Mueller probe) should have never happened.  We know that now as it didn't produce conspiracy charges for Flynn and others.  Comey along with others bought themselves 2 years of cover.  That had to be Comey's goal, to protect his cronies. 

 

Read it. 

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4442900-Ex-FBI-Director-James-Comey-s-memos.html

 

 

 

He might as well ask Strzok what his thoughts are while were at it

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

Nixon is different than Trump who has a firm 40% support no matter what.  Clinton's approval ratings went up into the 70's when he was impeached so it will probably backfire.  Dragging the impeachment out like this is the smart play.  Barr didn't do anything wrong up to this point from what I've seen as Mueller put him in a tough spot.

Mueller's statement was in pretty sharp contrast to what Barr said a few months ago.  Barr was only in a "tough spot" because he was/is trying to cover for Trump, even though the report is pretty damning. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

It's factually incorrect to say that Trump firing Comey, going on Lester Holt and saying the firing of Comey was Russia related, and then the Special Counsel being hired just a few days later aren't directly connected? Seriously???

 

Which was Volume I and which was Volume II again? ... Collusion/conspiracy and alleged treason were the drivers of the FBI and USIC investigations (per the official story) and the SCO. If they weren't, that order would be reversed. ;) 

 

3 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

 

 

 

 

McCabe is not a reputable source on this subject considering he's the subject of three known criminal investigations.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Buftex said:

Mueller's statement was in pretty sharp contrast to what Barr said a few months ago.  Barr was only in a "tough spot" because he was/is trying to cover for Trump, even though the report is pretty damning. 

Dude get real.  The very best one can do for Mueller is call it he said she said.  To assume which one is lying you'd need to look at the known facts, all of which were written by Mueller but align with what Barr said much more directly.  

 

To boil it down to one question: If there was obstruction and Trump was not charged because of one rule that protected only him, why was no one else charged with obstruction?

 

Not one person in his orbit was charged with obstruction of the investigation.  Think about that.  Do you think if one low level lackey stepped out of line on a Wednesday afternoon and told Andrew Weisman to get bent that it would have been let go?  Or might they have brought him in and given him "the Flynn"?

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
14 hours ago, Bray Wyatt said:

 

Interesting that you and Buffalo Gal, both in the writing profession, use something like that to help with your writing :P

 

I haven't used it for my writing career, and look how far it has gotten me? ...OK, maybe not a good example.

  • Haha (+1) 5
Posted

Has everyone lost their minds? You don’t want to live in a country where a government paid prosecutor can hold a national press conference and cast a major shadow on your reputation but then conclude by saying he’s not going to charge you. Your life is ruined. You can’t put up a defense. And all of this is on national television. Comey, Mueller...my god what’s happened here?!! 

 

We are all 1000% INNOCENT unless someone can prove you are not! And you’re entitled to a defense in a court room with rules that protect the defendant. These so called professionals need to shut the f&$k up before we lose the whole system. 

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
16 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


grammarly.com - basically a browser extension

 

I don’t need no stinking browser extension. My browser is just fine. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Has everyone lost their minds? You don’t want to live in a country where a government paid prosecutor can hold a national press conference and cast a major shadow on your reputation but then conclude by saying he’s not going to charge you. Your life is ruined. You can’t put up a defense. And all of this is on national television. Comey, Mueller...my god what’s happened here?!! 

 

We are all 1000% INNOCENT unless someone can prove you are not! And you’re entitled to a defense in a court room with rules that protect the defendant. These so called professionals need to shut the f&$k up before we lose the whole system. 

 

 

Robert Mueller's 'no questions' routine is absolute nonsense

The Hill [DC], by Jonathan Turley

 

Original Article

 

Question #1-What are you scared of?

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

can you imagine that in the past, present, and future that people were, are, and will be willing to lay their life down for their country without fanfare

 

and snowflakes like Mueller can't even bow out gracefully without a lame comment every week

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

What?

 

The Mueller team lawyers were biased, when did this happen ?

 

:lol:


I'd laugh if it hadn't been so obvious from the beginning, and V2 had not solidified that extreme bias. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

it's hard when you are thrown into a case without an actual crime or damages to tie into

 

you get 16 TB of info and there's nothing to lead you

 

but fun to waste time for 2 years running out the clock every day, stress-free and collecting a fat paycheck

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Has everyone lost their minds? You don’t want to live in a country where a government paid prosecutor can hold a national press conference and cast a major shadow on your reputation but then conclude by saying he’s not going to charge you. Your life is ruined. You can’t put up a defense. And all of this is on national television. Comey, Mueller...my god what’s happened here?!! 

 

We are all 1000% INNOCENT unless someone can prove you are not! And you’re entitled to a defense in a court room with rules that protect the defendant. These so called professionals need to shut the f&$k up before we lose the whole system. 

 

This post reeks of white, male privilege.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 5
Posted
10 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

 

 

 

McCabe is not a reputable source on this subject considering he's the subject of three known criminal investigations.

well, so was Trump no?

3 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

 

 

We are all 1000% INNOCENT unless someone can prove you are not! 

Unless you are POTUS it seems, which I never knew until this mess

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

I wish there was a way that a thread wouldnt show as updated if a person you have on ignore was the one to update it. 

  • Like (+1) 3
×
×
  • Create New...