Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So Barr released more of the report than Mueller wanted but Dems say Barr withheld report info? /SMH

 

We conducted an independent criminal investigation and reported the results to the Attorney General—as required by Department regulations.

  

The Attorney General then concluded that it was appropriate to provide our report to Congress and the American people.

 

At one point in time I requested that certain portions of the report be released.  The Attorney General preferred to make the entire report public all at once.  We appreciate that the Attorney General made the report largely public.  I do not question the Attorney General’s good faith in that decision.

Edited by Uncle Joe
quote added
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
  On 5/29/2019 at 3:11 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

So, Mueller gave what he intends to be his only statement on the matter. Says the report should speak for itself (no collusion, no conspiracy). He said he couldn't charge Trump with obstruction so they didn't consider it -- and left a window for Congress to pursue. 

 

Expand  

 

Which is entirely reasonable, actually.  The whole report should have been portrayed that way - "we can't criminally indict a sitting president, but Congress can impeach him, which process this report serves to inform."

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

oh please start an impeachment process

 

no wait, don't, please don't throw Brer Trump in the briar patch...

 

image.png.81144646182468b7d491fab6845d2529.png

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
  On 5/29/2019 at 3:15 PM, DC Tom said:

 

Which is entirely reasonable, actually.  The whole report should have been portrayed that way - "we can't criminally indict a sitting president, but Congress can impeach him, which process this report serves to inform."

Expand  

 

Correct. It's also a bear trap for Congress. Let them walk into it. 

 

Expect a response/counter from Trump today.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 5/29/2019 at 3:17 PM, Tiberius said:

No, he said they couldn't establish enough evidence to be used in court. There was a conspiracy, anyone saying there wasn't (Mueller isn't saying that) a conspiracy is lying 

Expand  

 

Innocent until proven guilty. He's a prosecutor. If he doesn't have enough evidence it means he's innocent. 

 

Unless you're pushing a complete reversal of our judicial system?

  On 5/29/2019 at 3:18 PM, Tiberius said:

Not yet, still time to wait...

Expand  

 

If they wait, the declass will bury them. If they go forward, the declass will bury them. 

 

They are ***** either way, they've already lost. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

 

2 years..........................................35 million dollars..........................................insufficient evidence

 

 

Image result for that's all folks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
  On 5/29/2019 at 3:18 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Innocent until proven guilty. He's a prosecutor. If he doesn't have enough evidence it means he's innocent. 

 

Unless you're pushing a complete reversal of our judicial system?

 

If they wait, the declass will bury them. If they go forward, the declass will bury them. 

 

They are ***** either way, they've already lost. 

Expand  

Oh no, impeachment will be fine. It will be the Movie of the Mueller Report. 

 

Senate won't convict, but the damage of Trump will be done. 

 

If the Dems are smart they will use impeachment to smash Trump down so he walks into 2020 a dead man walking (and tweeting garbage) 

Posted

There was nothing said that wasn't in the report. 

 

The report still stands... No collusion/conspiracy. And punted on obstruction. Barr ruled on obstruction, that's over from a legal stand point. The only thing left is politics. 

 

And who has the better hand? The congress or Trump and the FBI/DOJ/CIA/NSA? 

 

Game on.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...