Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Foxx said:

do you understand how many other supporting indictments would be on the record right now to support what you are claiming? there is nothing there, understand that.

Oh tell me how many! 

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Oh tell me how many! 

 

Ooh, ooh, I know!  More than...ZERO?

 

Not that it matters because, as everyone (well, almost) knows, and William Barr reiterated, you can indict a sitting President.

Edited by Doc
Posted

 

On Obstruction: "The SCO did not draw a conclusion one way or another..."

Report leaves it unresolved. 

 

"While this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it does not exonerate him."

(leaving it up to AG Barr to determine that)

Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

On Obstruction: "The SCO did not draw a conclusion one way or another..."

Report leaves it unresolved. 

 

"While this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it does not exonerate him."

(leaving it up to AG Barr to determine that)


Guess what headline the MSM is gonna go with?

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...