Doc Posted May 17, 2019 Posted May 17, 2019 On 5/16/2019 at 12:01 PM, Deranged Rhino said: <br /> On 5/16/2019 at 2:55 PM, DC Tom said: That just makes too much ***** sense. They took it not literally literally, but Biden literally. More like millenial "literally." 21 hours ago, reddogblitz said: The DNC "hack" allegedly. I wonder what ever happened to the person with the jump drive? Botched-mugged. 3
3rdnlng Posted May 17, 2019 Posted May 17, 2019 54 minutes ago, Doc said: More like millenial "literally." Botched-mugged. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/debbie-wasserman-schultzs-brother-steven-wasserman-accused-burying-seth-rich-case/ Plus one of the Awan brothers (I believe Imran) was the last person to be seen with Seth Rich. 3
njbuff Posted May 17, 2019 Posted May 17, 2019 36 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/debbie-wasserman-schultzs-brother-steven-wasserman-accused-burying-seth-rich-case/ Plus one of the Awan brothers (I believe Imran) was the last person to be seen with Seth Rich. The Seth Rich story might be the biggest MSM cover up going, because if the truth comes out................. get your popcorn, this might get good. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted May 18, 2019 Posted May 18, 2019 Thread / Important work on how the Mueller team, despite claims otherwise, were leaking to the press like a sieve the entire time: 5 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 19, 2019 Posted May 19, 2019 Even Mittens says so... Two years of fake stories -- not a single of the "if you don't believe Trump colluded you're a partisan" asshats have ventured back down to the dungeon since the report came out. Wonder why? 3
Tiberius Posted May 20, 2019 Posted May 20, 2019 A Republican has spoken out about Trump's obvious Obstruction of Justice I offer these conclusions only after having read Mueller’s redacted report carefully and completely, having read or watched pertinent statements and testimony, and having discussed this matter with my staff, who thoroughly reviewed materials and provided me with further analysis. — Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019 Quote “Contrary to Barr’s portrayal, Mueller’s report reveals that President Trump engaged in specific actions and a pattern of behavior that meet the threshold for impeachment,” Amash said. “In fact, Mueller’s report identifies multiple examples of conduct satisfying all the elements of obstruction of justice, and undoubtedly any person who is not the president of the United States would be indicted based on such evidence.” That judgment is supported by more than 900 former federal prosecutors who have signed onto a letter reaffirming this exact point. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/19/why-justin-amash-stands-alone/?utm_term=.d6545f29cca5
Nanker Posted May 20, 2019 Author Posted May 20, 2019 Still no collusion, but lots of anger and confusion on the Left. Leftists are such losers.
Deranged Rhino Posted May 20, 2019 Posted May 20, 2019 (edited) Edited May 20, 2019 by Deranged Rhino 1 1
B-Man Posted May 20, 2019 Posted May 20, 2019 Victor Davis Hanson on how Brennan and Clapper are turning on each other. Note well: none of the leveraged targets of Robert Mueller turned state’s evidence to accuse Donald Trump of “collusion,” the object of the special counsel’s investigation, although to have done so would have mightily helped their cause and given them John Dean iconic status among leftists. In contrast, we have scarcely begun to investigate wrongdoing at the intelligence and justice departments and already the suspects are fingering each other. James Clapper, John Brennan, and James Comey are now all accusing one another of being culpable for inserting the unverified dossier, the font of the effort to destroy Trump, into a presidential intelligence assessment—as if suddenly and mysteriously the prior seeding of the Steele dossier is now seen as a bad thing. And how did the dossier transmogrify from being passed around the Obama Administration as a supposedly top-secret and devastating condemnation of candidate and then president-elect Trump to a rank embarrassment of ridiculous stories and fibs? Given the narratives of the last three years, and the protestations that the dossier was accurate or at least was not proven to be unproven, why are these former officials arguing at all? Did not implanting the dossier into the presidential briefing give it the necessary imprimatur that allowed the serial leaks to the press at least to be passed on to the public and thereby apprise the people of the existential danger that they faced? Why would not they still be vying to take credit for warning President Obama that Donald J. Trump was a likely sexual pervert, with a pathological hatred of Obama, as manifested in Trump’s alleged Moscow debauchery—a reprobate who used his subordinates to steal the election from Hillary Clinton and who still must somehow be stopped at all costs? That entire bought fantasy was the subtext of why Mueller was appointed in the first place. It was the basis for the persistent support to this day among the media and progressives for the now discredited notion of “collusion.” If our noble public servants really believed all that to be true, would not Comey and Brennan instead now be arguing that each, not the other, was bold and smart enough to have included the seminal dossier into a presidential briefing? Comey in public still insists that the dossier is not discredited, though in all his sanctimonious televised sermons, he never has provided any details that support the supposed veracity of Steele’s charges. Why then is Comey not demanding that the FBI take credit for bringing this key piece of intelligence to Obama’s attention rather than fobbing off such an important feat to the rival CIA? Why, for that matter, are Andrew McCabe and James Comey at odds? Because they know what’s coming. . 3 1
B-Man Posted May 20, 2019 Posted May 20, 2019 BYRON YORK: Mueller Changed Everything. From now on, the Trump-Russia affair, the investigation that dominated the first years of Donald Trump’s presidency, will be divided into two parts: before and after the release of the Mueller report. Before the special counsel’s findings were made public last month, the president’s adversaries were on the offensive. Now, they are playing defense. The change is due to one simple fact: Mueller could not establish that there was a conspiracy or coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign to fix the 2016 election. The special counsel’s office interviewed 500 witnesses, issued 2,800 subpoenas, executed nearly 500 search-and-seizure warrants, and obtained nearly 300 records of electronic communications, and still could not establish the one thing that mattered most in the investigation. Without a judgment that a conspiracy — or collusion, in the popular phrase — took place, everything else in the Trump-Russia affair began to shrink in significance. . . . Of course, TV talking heads are still arguing over obstruction. But with the report’s release, the investigation moved from the legal realm to the political realm. And in the political realm, the president has a simple and effective case to make to the 99.6% of Americans who are not lawyers: They say I obstructed an investigation into something that didn’t happen? And they want to impeach me for that? The ground has shifted in the month since the report became public. Before the release, many Democrats adopted a “wait for Mueller” stance, basing their anti-Trump strategy on the hope that Mueller would find the much-anticipated conspiracy. Then Mueller did not deliver. And not only that, Mueller’s report stretched to 448 pages, with long stretches of minutia and arcane legal argument that the public would never read. Democrats searched for a way to convince Americans that the president was still guilty of something serious. They devised a plan to turn the Mueller report into a TV show, accessible to millions of viewers who have not read even a page of the report itself. They would call key witnesses to give dramatic testimony in televised hearings that would build support for possible impeachment. At the same time, they would insist that Attorney General William Barr, who has allowed top lawmakers to see the full Mueller report with the exception of a small amount of grand jury material, was hiding something, and that the hidden material might reveal presidential wrongdoing. So far, the strategy has not worked. The White House, which provided Mueller testimony and documents that might easily have been withheld as privileged, has not been so forthcoming with Congress. We gave the criminal investigator, Mueller, what he needed, the White House said, but we are not obligated to do the same for Congress. . 3
Koko78 Posted May 20, 2019 Posted May 20, 2019 14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: This was truly a bizarre stunt. Hilarious that someone in the Democrat leadership forced them to read Volume I, but bizarre. 3
Hedge Posted May 20, 2019 Posted May 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, Koko78 said: This was truly a bizarre stunt. Hilarious that someone in the Democrat leadership forced them to read Volume I, but bizarre. 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 20, 2019 Posted May 20, 2019 Just now, Koko78 said: This was truly a bizarre stunt. Hilarious that someone in the Democrat leadership forced them to read Volume I, but bizarre. One of the people I've gotten to know pretty well the past three years of digging into this is an analyst for an alphabet agency. They've joked for over a year now that if they were to write up an honest analysis on the behavior of the principles on the coup plotters side of things, they'd have to conclude that some are being paid/coerced into performing political seppuku, and a small group in leadership are being given bonuses based on the level of idiocy they display. Some of the counter moves really make no earthly sense. Strange times. 2 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 20, 2019 Posted May 20, 2019 These clips are going to be gold during the campaign ad season. 3
Deranged Rhino Posted May 20, 2019 Posted May 20, 2019 Oh... so close! Next time they REALLY got him. And Mueller is not going to testify until after the OIG report is out -- meaning, he's not going to testify. His choice, not Barr's or Trump's. Ask yourself why. 3 1
Recommended Posts