Deranged Rhino Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 9 minutes ago, Tiberius said: And then there is the obvious obstruction of justice situation. What will Mueller add to that story? Nothing. If he had charges to bring on obstruction, they would have been brought before he wrapped. Not a single indictment for conspiracy/collusion or obstruction were filed. Not one. It's over. You were wrong. Bigly.
/dev/null Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Trump refused to testify. He was scared. Why? When did Mueller subpoena Trump to testify?
Tiberius Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Nothing. If he had charges to bring on obstruction, they would have been brought before he wrapped. Not a single indictment for conspiracy/collusion or obstruction were filed. Not one. It's over. You were wrong. Bigly. Can't indict a sitting president. He might just be turning this over to Congress for impeachment or a censure. I'm fine letting this damaged POS run in 2020. See, that's the nice thing about this report. Trump was so terrified of it he ran to appease his base to protect against impeachment. That will work against him in general election. Just now, /dev/null said: When did Mueller subpoena Trump to testify? Never. He asked him and he refused. He was scared. LOL
/dev/null Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Never. He asked him and he refused. He was scared. LOL A prosecutor can ask the subject or any witness of their investigation to testify. The subject/witness is not compelled If a prosecutor has evidence of wrong doing they can go to a judge to request a subpoena compelling the subject/witness to testify Why did Mueller not request a subpoena? Edited March 24, 2019 by /dev/null 1 1
Keukasmallies Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 I'm not sure about all the different characteristics of a hypnotoad, but I think Tiberius "are" one.
Nanker Posted March 24, 2019 Author Posted March 24, 2019 So Mueller's done with his report. Does Trump fire him NOW? FINALLY? Maybe he'll fire Nancy Pelosi next. 1
DC Tom Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: I believe so. Until the peace talks with DPRK started in earnest, then it became: "He's not starting enough wars!" You're both forgetting the Olympics. 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Who's going to be the first to come out with "Who cares about the Mueller Report when children are being ripped from their families and murdered by ICE at the boarder [sic]?" 1
row_33 Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Trump refused to testify. He was scared. Why? your little ***** up world requires people to testify without even being asked to ?
Tiberius Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 Trump contemplating resigning if report shows conspiracy with the Russians? Just asking for a friend...
Doc Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Can't indict a sitting president. He might just be turning this over to Congress for impeachment or a censure. I'm fine letting this damaged POS run in 2020. See, that's the nice thing about this report. Trump was so terrified of it he ran to appease his base to protect against impeachment. That will work against him in general election. Never. He asked him and he refused. He was scared. LOL I just refuted this bogus claim on the previous page. That you ignored it doesn't change the fact that you're wrong. And impeachment was never going to happen if there was no collusion, which there wasn't. So we can put that to rest. Now, I can't wait to see how the sausage was being made... 1
row_33 Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 2 hours ago, Doc said: Wasn't there also some stuff about tanking the economy and starting WWIII? what does it matter when they 100% believe the world is ending in 12 years? ------------------------------------ sorry, was Trump subpoenaed to testify?
Tiberius Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, Doc said: I just refuted this bogus claim on the previous page. That you ignored it doesn't change the fact that you're wrong. And impeachment was never going to happen if there was no collusion, which there wasn't. So we can put that to rest. Now, I can't wait to see how the sausage was being made...
/dev/null Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 1 minute ago, row_33 said: what does it matter when they 100% believe the world is ending in 12 years? if the world is ending in 12 years, i better get busy. there are so many places that i want to see before the world ends. that's alot of driving and flying, and eating meat
Doc Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, row_33 said: what does it matter when they 100% believe the world is ending in 12 years? Yeah but the solution is simple. It's man-made global warming, er, climate change. They want to help the problem so... Just now, Tiberius said: Great, you linked it. Now watch it.
Tiberius Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Doc said: Yeah but the solution is simple. It's man-made global warming, er, climate change. They want to help the problem so... Great, you linked it. Now watch it. It proves my point
/dev/null Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: It proves my point that you're a blithering idiot? you've made that case on multiple occasions over a period of several years and at least two user names
Tiberius Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 1 minute ago, /dev/null said: that you're a blithering idiot? you've made that case on multiple occasions over a period of several years and at least two user names Are you ok? I think you are losing it. Here, you love Asian girls, right? 1
Foxx Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: I guess you right wingers have to declare victory before the report is out to try and convince casual news consumers "drive byes" that there is nothing in it, when you have no clue at all yourselves. What if Mueller concludes a president can't be indicted but there is evidence he should be? do you understand how many other supporting indictments would be on the record right now to support what you are claiming? there is nothing there, understand that.
Recommended Posts