plenzmd1 Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Thread This is interesting to me and i am engaged in other stuff and did not hear the PC. Is he saying Mueller thought there may have been obstruction? I am a little confused
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 Trump just said, "No collusion, no obstruction. There never was, there never will be. We have to get to the bottom of these things. This should never happen"... "this should never happen to another President again... this hoax should never happen again" That is what he just said at the Wounded Warriors speech, and now he's on to the speech. 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, plenzmd1 said: This is interesting to me and i am engaged in other stuff and did not hear the PC. Is he saying Mueller thought there may have been obstruction? I am a little confused Mueller's team (read: Weissman) laid out several legal theories to argue obstruction which Barr and RR disagreed with. 1
plenzmd1 Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Mueller's team (read: Weissman) laid out several legal theories to argue obstruction which Barr and RR disagreed with. Got it..thank you. Did he lay out what exactly? Or they gunna force me to read that whole damn thing LOL. I need cliff notes! @Deranged Rhino , get on it!!!! also have a feeling @DC Tom can break that thing down in minutes too! 1
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 Report: https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf 1 minute ago, plenzmd1 said: Got it..thank you. Did he lay out what exactly? Or they gunna force me to read that whole damn thing LOL. I need cliff notes! @Deranged Rhino , get on it!!!! also have a feeling @DC Tom can break that thing down in minutes too! Just getting into it now... I'm skimming the conclusions/footnotes first. There aren't many redactions... 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Report: https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf Just getting into it now... I'm skimming the conclusions/footnotes first. It is nonsearchable. {gasping for breath} ? 2
whatdrought Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 Did the Mueller report find out how trump managed to steal the election through deployment of the electoral college? 5
Nanker Posted April 18, 2019 Author Posted April 18, 2019 (edited) There are 10 points that could be considered to be obstruction. (According to what I heard) 1. Saying to Comey that he hopes he would go easy on Flynn 2. Firing Comey 3. Tweeting “Comey and WH recordings” 4. Tweeting “witch hunt” 5. Getting McCabe fired Anybody have more? Edited April 18, 2019 by Nanker
DC Tom Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 12 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: Got it..thank you. Did he lay out what exactly? Or they gunna force me to read that whole damn thing LOL. I need cliff notes! @Deranged Rhino , get on it!!!! also have a feeling @DC Tom can break that thing down in minutes too! When I have minutes. I'm busy fighting off protesting Bernie Bros and stocky women in comfortable shoes and flannel "I'm with Her" shirts. 1 4
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Nanker said: When do the indictments start coming down? After Horowitz's report - May/June (betting May) 2
plenzmd1 Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 does this mean if the Russians delivered the info, there would be collusion?
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 1 minute ago, plenzmd1 said: does this mean if the Russians delivered the info, there would be collusion? This is Trump Tower - the Russian in question who met with Trump was granted an emergency visa by Obama's State Dept to make the meeting, and she met with Glenn Simpson before and after the meeting. In other words, it wasn't collusion. It was entrapment. By Fusion GPS and the Obama administration. 3
Bray Wyatt Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: This is Trump Tower - the Russian in question who met with Trump was granted an emergency visa by Obama's State Dept to make the meeting, and she met with Glenn Simpson before and after the meeting. In other words, it wasn't collusion. It was entrapment. By Fusion GPS and the Obama administration. The premise, per Trump Jr., was opposition research and that is what they thought the meeting was for. So even if the Russian had "delivered" that info, how would that be collusion? 1 1
RochesterRob Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 4 minutes ago, MILFHUNTER#518 said: Tibs is quite silent this morning... Tis not a good day at the Soros Cubicle Farm. Tibs needs to slip off the restraints and ball gag first.
Recommended Posts