Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
34 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

He did actually......hurries are a much more important number then sacks

And if 1/2 the holding calls against him would have been called, those 10 yds would have been huge for field position. He was screwed last year on a ton of "no calls".

Posted
1 hour ago, CDogg20 said:

I’m throwing my money on TE. I think Hockenson is the pick. Would love Burns though

 

I would be happy, I know Beane and Daboll value that position.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Chandler#81 said:

6 pages and no Peter Pan? 

 

We’re slipping..

...where the hell is Dunkirk Don when we need instantaneous clarification?.......and 26 went rogue.........

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Mister Defense said:

Good move, as he had 9.5 sacks just two years ago. 

 

Did not play great last year in New England, but you never know.

 

Depending on contract could be a good low risk, possible high reward signing.

 

 


That 9.5 sack year was his only good performance of his otherwise disappointing career, and if memory serves he got 5-6 sacks in one game.

Posted
Just now, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

...where the hell is Dunkirk Don when we need instantaneous clarification?.......and 26 went rogue.........

Can we add a simple question mark to the thread title?

Posted
1 minute ago, BullBuchanan said:


That 9.5 sack year was his only good performance of his otherwise disappointing career, and if memory serves he got 5-6 sacks in one game.

He didn’t sign here.  

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...