Pete Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: I can’t see us going DT early when we already have Star, Phillips and Harry that can all start and certainly rotate in and play big snaps. I’m not saying we won’t get 1 period, I just can’t see it early. We need to replace Kyle Williams. Not to mention, the defensive talent in this draft is legendary. Besides QBs, the top 10 might all be defensive lineman. That is two strong arguments to draft a DT early IMO Edited March 16, 2019 by Pete 3
Stank_Nasty Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 1 minute ago, Rufridr101 said: Maybe a Jerry Hughes trade coming because they might sign a dude that had 2.5 sacks last year? …. what in gods name would make somebody say something so foolish? if they were to ever trade hughes it wouldn't be because they picked up Clayborn. good lord, dude. 4 2
Kelly the Dog Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, Rufridr101 said: Maybe a Jerry Hughes trade coming Please no. He's been our best DL player for years, better than Kyle, and is still top tier. 5
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, Rufridr101 said: Maybe a Jerry Hughes trade coming ...and why?.......pretty productive for his $8.95 mil tariff due in 2019......he's only 30 and could work out a 2 year extension before 2020 UFA status...........
Rufridr101 Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 Just now, Kelly the Dog said: Please no. He's been our best DL player for years, better than Kyle, and is still top tier. He has but really not a true scheme fit for McDermottsscheme
Pete Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 Rashan Gary is a player I believe the Bills are strongly considering at 9, if available.
formerlyofCtown Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 36 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said: he was basically in NE as a sub-rusher. PFF had him ranked 5th in the whole league in "rush productivity". 39 total pressures on 255 pass snaps. that can only help our meager pass rush I would assume. while i'm not a fan of just looking at pressures, that stat kind of has a cult following around here when it comes to one of our own DE's. so I figured i'd mention it. Its a legit number because it shows the ability to get penetration and to beat the blocker. The lack of sacks shows the imortance of being able to colapse the pocket
3rdand12 Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 5 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said: Please no. He's been our best DL player for years, better than Kyle, and is still top tier. yes
H2o Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 This would be the weakest signing of the FA period. We have a younger, better version of Clayborn in Shaq Lawson already.
formerlyofCtown Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 (edited) If true we got a guy that actually wants to play the Pats twice a year.? On a more serious note, he can probably play inside at the 3Tech on some downs. Edited March 16, 2019 by formerlyofCtown
3rdand12 Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, Rufridr101 said: He has but really not a true scheme fit for McDermottsscheme it's a fair point. but they run rotation and also plays some flexible lines. Hughes should fit just fine.
Rufridr101 Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 Just now, 3rdand12 said: it's a fair point. but they run rotation and also plays some flexible lines. Hughes should fit just fine. But next year we get nothing in return. Teams that run the wide 9 or 34 looking for a rush linebacker will pay for Jerry.
Kelly the Dog Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 7 minutes ago, Rufridr101 said: He has but really not a true scheme fit for McDermottsscheme A DE that pressures the QB, can still stop the run, gets sacks, hustles his ass off to the whistle on every play and runs down guys on the other side of the field fits every scheme perfectly. 2 1
Johnny3410 Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said: A DE that pressures the QB, can still stop the run, gets sacks, hustles his ass off to the whistle on every play and runs down guys on the other side of the field fits every scheme perfectly. Thank you 1
John from Riverside Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 52 minutes ago, Bangarang said: Unlikely. Our d-line is that bad Why do you keep pushing this narrative Our D line is NOT that bad...if it was that bad our D would not be good which it is..... You are always looking to improve......but there are a lot of team with way worse DL situations then ours 1
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 1 minute ago, GG said: Any legit confirmations of this fact? I'd like to know, as well.
3rdand12 Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 9 minutes ago, Rufridr101 said: But next year we get nothing in return. Teams that run the wide 9 or 34 looking for a rush linebacker will pay for Jerry. from a business perspective ? perhaps. But i have been watching 55 play since he arrived from the Colts. 55 is one of my favorites. improve a couple of pieces on the line and everyone will look good this season
Recommended Posts