NewEra Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 1 minute ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: I can’t see us going DT early when we already have Star, Phillips and Harry that can all start and certainly rotate in and play big snaps. I’m not saying we won’t get 1 period, I just can’t see it early. You need 4 DT in a rotation. Star is ok. Phillips is ok and Phillips is ok. None of which are good at rushing the QB. We need a pass rushing DT in the mix really bad imo. 5
947 Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 Awesome, he lives a couple blocks from me in the offseason.
Bangarang Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 6 minutes ago, Doc said: Is it? It could be better (which is why I think they go DL, specifically DT in the 1st) but it's not that bad. We don’t have anyone besides Jerry that can get to the QB. It’s a problem. 1
Mister Defense Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 (edited) Good move, as he had 9.5 sacks just two years ago. Did not play great last year in New England, but you never know. Depending on contract could be a good low risk, possible high reward signing. Edited March 16, 2019 by Mister Defense
CommonCents Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 Just now, Mister Defense said: Good move, as he had 9.5 sacks just two years ago. Did not play great last year in New England, but you never know. Depending a contract could be a good low risk, possible high reward signing. His total from 17 is very misleading. IIRC he had six of those in one game against a third string tackle who had no business playing in the NFL. 2
NoSaint Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 11 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: I can’t see us going DT early when we already have Star, Phillips and Harry that can all start and certainly rotate in and play big snaps. I’m not saying we won’t get 1 period, I just can’t see it early. I see nothing there that precludes is from it even slightly
billspro Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 14 minutes ago, DJB said: Further smoke in my mind we are going 3 technique DT in the first. DT or TE in the first two rounds. Just not sure which one we pick first. 2
Andrew Son Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 Solid player. Mostly comes off right edge for pats. Not going to beat you with speed around the edge, but has some moves and wins on stunts to the inside. Good run defender as well. Can line up inside as well.
Bangarang Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, billspro said: DT or TE in the first two rounds. Just not sure which one we pick first. DT if we are smart. 4
Mister Defense Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 7 minutes ago, CommonCents said: His total from 17 is very misleading. IIRC he had six of those in one game against a third string tackle who had no business playing in the NFL. Thanks, just reading that online. Yes, that does make a difference considering the guy has had only 30 sacks in his career. Hope the Bills got him cheap!
TheBeaneBandit Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 17 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: I can’t see us going DT early when we already have Star, Phillips and Harry that can all start and certainly rotate in and play big snaps. I’m not saying we won’t get 1 period, I just can’t see it early. Star is the only one who is starting caliber, and that is only as a supposed run stuffer. Harry hasn't really done anything and all Phillips has really done is pump up the home crowd and batted a few passes. DT is a huge and glaring need.
3rdand12 Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 23 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said: he was basically in NE as a sub-rusher. PFF had him ranked 5th in the whole league in "rush productivity". 39 total pressures on 255 pass snaps. that can only help our meager pass rush I would assume. while i'm not a fan of just looking at pressures, that stat kind of has a cult following around here when it comes to one of our own DE's. so I figured i'd mention it. Hello : )
GunnerBill Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 Definite scheme fit. He was a guy I predicted the Bills to have interest in last offseason when he was a FA from Atlanta. He is the "big end" type that McDermott and Beane collected in Carolina. In the end he went to New England but I am not at all surprised he ends up in Buffalo. Always felt that he was a guy they would be interested in.. 2
Rufridr101 Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 If this is true it's makes sense because of McDermotts scheme. His type of 43 defense requires ends that use power and squeeze the pocket rather than speed around the tackle. 2 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 14 minutes ago, NoSaint said: I see nothing there that precludes is from it even slightly ....McBeane is OBD's Phil Ivey......check?.....call?....raise?....all in?.........figure out his next move?....um right....
formerlyofCtown Posted March 16, 2019 Posted March 16, 2019 33 minutes ago, Doc said: Is it? It could be better (which is why I think they go DL, specifically DT in the 1st) but it's not that bad. I believe if we get a penetraiting DT the sack numbers improve vastely as there wil be no pocket to step up into. No place to hide from Jerry anymore. 29 minutes ago, NewEra said: You need 4 DT in a rotation. Star is ok. Phillips is ok and Phillips is ok. None of which are good at rushing the QB. We need a pass rushing DT in the mix really bad imo. We need another 3Tec. 1
Recommended Posts