Alaska Darin Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 5 Year Old Finds Parents Shot to Death The couple apparently feared the suspect and tried to get a court-ordered injunction to keep him away from their family. However, a judge denied the request on account that there was not enough evidence to support the stalking charge. The judge, in denying the case, said "no violence was alleged and it was hard to prove stalking with the allegations" presented, according to court papers. Not that a piece of paper would have helped... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 5 Year Old Finds Parents Shot to Death The couple apparently feared the suspect and tried to get a court-ordered injunction to keep him away from their family. However, a judge denied the request on account that there was not enough evidence to support the stalking charge. The judge, in denying the case, said "no violence was alleged and it was hard to prove stalking with the allegations" presented, according to court papers. Not that a piece of paper would have helped... 291258[/snapback] A .38 would have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 Another Florida story? And the sharks are circling as well. Can't we just give FL to cuba or something? Did you bring up this story to have a gun control debate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 "Looking back on it, I would have liked to have done it differently," Circuit Judge Richard Graham said." Gee, ya think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 Gee, ya think? 291272[/snapback] Another tough job. We obviously don't know much about the case, but considering how many restraining orders get brought before judges, the judges are often rightly skeptical. Court Ordering where someone can and cannot be is pretty serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 Another tough job. We obviously don't know much about the case, but considering how many restraining orders get brought before judges, the judges are often rightly skeptical. Court Ordering where someone can and cannot be is pretty serious. 291277[/snapback] I agree that it is a tough job. With stuff like this, you cannot afford to be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted March 30, 2005 Author Share Posted March 30, 2005 Another tough job. We obviously don't know much about the case, but considering how many restraining orders get brought before judges, the judges are often rightly skeptical. Court Ordering where someone can and cannot be is pretty serious. 291277[/snapback] I don't think that a guy who had murder in his heart would've cared too awful much about a restraining order anyway. Of course, I'm a natural skeptic. This is just another dose of: "The justice system/police are under no liability to protect you." There will be no financial restitution to this surviving child for this mistake (and I'm not advocating that). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 Another Florida story? And the sharks are circling as well. 291268[/snapback] Florida hasn't seen this many sharks since all those lawyers swarmed after the 2000 election Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts