Jay_Fixit Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, liverpoolkev said: This joke of a GM continues I think you’re following the wrong football. 1
BillsfanAZ Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 8 minutes ago, Virgil said: Eh. Couldn’t get it done in Baltimore and they were quick to move on. And that’s with Flacco, not Jackson. I just don’t see the need with who we already have. Brown only signed a 1 yr deal with the Ravens and he was productive. If the Bills keep improving their Oline to allow down field routes to develop, he should put up good numbers.
RyanC883 Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 Just now, Tatonka68 said: Brown says Allen > Jackson. Wants to get the ball. Allen MUCH > Jackson.
BillsCelticsAngelsBama Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 Just now, Juice_32 said: Ok, I really like this. We still need to draft one, give me Deebo! I’d rather have had him than T. Williams. 100% Agree.Deebo is the real deal. He is my favorite receiver in this draft..... although AJ Brown is my co-favorite. Constant playmakers over body beautiful's 1
Green Lightning Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 8 minutes ago, nucci said: we need 10-15 yd pass plays....can't throw deep all day That's what Zay, Kroft and Croom are for. 2
IgotBILLStopay Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 He has speed. A little underwhelming in his career so far - but given our acute needs and the slim WR pickings out there in FA - not at all a bad signing. Can live with 9 mill per year for him.
Scorp83 Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 10 minutes ago, JohnBonhamRocks said: Love it Ewww.... is it really? I liked him coming out of college but he's been hurt prior to last year. He'll definitely stretch the field but so would Tyrell Williams... But maybe begger's can't be choosers
glazeduck Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 5 minutes ago, H2o said: Not true. His stats with Flacco were way better and not a disappointment. Jackson isn't much of a throwing QB. Yep, I was going to post the same thing, when playing with Flacco he put up good numbers, drew several PIs (that obviously don't go to his stats) and just missed on several other big plays. Unmentioned is the fact that our top 3 WRs are all very versatile and can succeed from multiple spots in the formation... 1
BringBackOrton Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 Just now, Virgil said: It was with Flacco. I live in baltimore and all I know is that they couldn’t wait to get rid of him. He had a few splash plays in the beginning, but then the wheels fell off and he disappeared. Drops were an issue. But, the whole offense felll apart so maybe it’s shared blame He played 7 games with a guy who could barely complete passes. I'm not surprised he "fell off" at that point.
formerlyofCtown Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 7 minutes ago, Virgil said: Eh. Couldn’t get it done in Baltimore and they were quick to move on. And that’s with Flacco, not Jackson. I just don’t see the need with who we already have. Actually his numbers were good with Flacco. You should try looking things up before you open your mouth or key pad in this case. 1 1
Stank_Nasty Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 1 minute ago, Virgil said: It was with Flacco. I live in baltimore and all I know is that they couldn’t wait to get rid of him. He had a few splash plays in the beginning, but then the wheels fell off and he disappeared. Drops were an issue. But, the whole offense felll apart so maybe it’s shared blame uh ya. a qb with an arm.... that's the point. the pass game fell off the map in general once Jackson started. apparently you missed that.
Not at the table Karlos Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 8 minutes ago, nucci said: we need 10-15 yd pass plays....can't throw deep all day Then have them run a route that gains 10-15 yards.
BillsFan130 Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 Just now, Rico said: I still want to pick a WR on Day 2 not named Isabella or Renfrow. Ya I definitely think they should grab a WR in the 2nd or 3rd round assuming they have a guy they like
oldmanfan Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 Starting to wonder if they are going to use the draft to get their RT at 9.
Saint Doug Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 5 minutes ago, Mark Vader said: You know......the abolitionist who lead a raid on Harper's Ferry. You can’t coach abolitionism. 1 2
YoloinOhio Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 1 minute ago, Virgil said: It was with Flacco. I live in baltimore and all I know is that they couldn’t wait to get rid of him. He had a few splash plays in the beginning, but then the wheels fell off and he disappeared. Drops were an issue. But, the whole offense felll apart so maybe it’s shared blame Who couldn’t wait to get rid of him?
apuszczalowski Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 9 minutes ago, billsbackto81 said: What a difference a quarterback who can throw 70 yards can make. Or losing your job and needing a new one.... Looks like a decent signing, but I would question why the Ravens didnt want him back? 1
CountDorkula Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 I would have rather had Funchess for 1 year 10MM.
Rufridr101 Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 3 minutes ago, BuffaloBillies said: Brown 5' 10" Zay Jones 6' 1" Robert Foster 6' 2" If only there was some 6' 5" chiseled monster of a WR we could draft at #9 now to round out the WR group. Duke Williams 2
Just Joshin' Posted March 12, 2019 Posted March 12, 2019 Good signing, good price. A little concerned with injury history but that is in the discount I suspect. The Bills are setting up well to take BPA all day in the draft.
Recommended Posts