Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, BillStime said:


Just like that video you were tapping about earlier? 
 

Lolz


you didn’t watch it? 
 

 

2 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Just like that video you were tapping about earlier? 
 

Lolz

 

 

dollars 

Posted
16 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


you didn’t watch it? 
 

 

 

 

dollars 


And in a RED state - can you believe it?

 

Wait until you find out what pharmaceutical companies pay to wine and done doctors…

Posted
7 minutes ago, BillStime said:


And in a RED state - can you believe it?

 

Wait until you find out what pharmaceutical companies pay to wine and done doctors…


yup, also bad. So we agree here.  Ten reps just met and are forming a bill to ban this stuff so taking some action here.  Common sense needs to be applied 

Posted

 

 

Back to Letitia James.

 

 

Let's get real - if they thought they had Trump they would have filed a criminal case, but they have to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt. A civil suit is a preponderance of the evidence. They had no criminal case. They chose civil "fraud" to impress dumb people.

 

 

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, aristocrat said:

Meanwhile the dems voted down the investigation into the hunter and all his money and joe being the big guy getting paid.  Sure wish we’d investigate all the corruption not just one side. 

 

LOL!  The most corrupt and incompetent Administration in history?  Not a chance.

Posted
13 hours ago, Chris farley said:

the funny part is the fact its a civil vs criminal case proves their is NO evidence of guilt

 

No one is found guilty or innocent in civil court.

 

Tell OJ that. You shaking his hand?

Posted
18 hours ago, Doc said:

 

LOL!  The most corrupt and incompetent Administration in history?  Not a chance.

No one from Biden's admin has gone to jail. Can Trump say that? 

Posted
20 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Back to Letitia James.

 

 

Let's get real - if they thought they had Trump they would have filed a criminal case, but they have to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt. A civil suit is a preponderance of the evidence. They had no criminal case. They chose civil "fraud" to impress dumb people.

 

 

 

 

.

No, it's a strategy, gut his finances and then go for the criminal charges. 

 

Just like with Trump U, they will settle out of court for big money, way bigger than Trump U fraud case 

Posted
14 hours ago, Gene Frenkle said:

 

Tell OJ that. You shaking his hand?

What about Eliot Spitzer?  It’s hard figuring out who did what and where the lines get drawn on who is/isn’t above the law.  


Maybe I’m thinking of Cuomo, though not the sexual assault thing…not the ethics thing with the book… the fraudulent COVID death count.  
 

Of course, Spitzer and Cuomo had nothing to do with NY when they had their troubles…

 

Wait a minute. That doesn’t sound right…

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No, it's a strategy, gut his finances and then go for the criminal charges. 

 

Just like with Trump U, they will settle out of court for big money, way bigger than Trump U fraud case 

Tell us why they are following that strategy, Tibs.  

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Tenhigh said:

Tell us why they are following that strategy, Tibs.  

Best way to get the POS 

 

Low hanging fruit first and then use the evidence from civil trial in the criminal trial 

Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Best way to get the POS 

 

Low hanging fruit first and then use the evidence from civil trial in the criminal trial 

Did he sleep with your sister?  If not, then why do you care so deeply? This Trump-hate is a bit over the top....no? 

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, SoCal Deek said:

Did he sleep with your sister?  If not, then why do you care so deeply? This Trump-hate is a bit over the top....no? 

No, he just tried ruining our republic. You don't care. 

Posted
37 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Are you drunk?

Not yet…give me a couple of hours. 

But back to the question….was for years of peace and prosperity that much of a problem for you? 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

Not yet…give me a couple of hours. 

But back to the question….was for years of peace and prosperity that much of a problem for you? 

You mean under Obama? 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You mean under Obama? 

I’m always curious as to what you do for a living….because unless you were locked in a cell or on a deserted island, you missed a great four years! Sucks for you I guess. Too bad really. But I’m guessing it explains ‘some’ of your perspective. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...