3rdnlng Posted July 30, 2019 Author Posted July 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Koko78 said: How, exactly, did this "stupid kid" act like a "dickehad"? Don't ask. If anyone knows dickheads, it's Shady.
IDBillzFan Posted July 30, 2019 Posted July 30, 2019 1 hour ago, ShadyBillsFan said: LOL this stupid kid actually thought he could win (after he acted like a dickehad) Can you break down for us how the kid acted like a *****? Please feel free to provide the unedited full- length video and break it down for us. Don't hesitate to support your case by also breaking down the history of the drum-banger as well as the black men who were yelling in the background at the black kids who were with Sandman.
unbillievable Posted July 30, 2019 Posted July 30, 2019 It's funny that a Newspaper used the defense that they printed opinions, and not facts, to get a defamation suit dismissed. ? 2
B-Man Posted July 30, 2019 Posted July 30, 2019 15 minutes ago, unbillievable said: It's funny that a Newspaper used the defense that they printed opinions, and not facts, to get a defamation suit dismissed. ? Exactly. FTA that I posted above: It wasn’t until videos capturing the entire incident came out that the media realized it had been peddling fake news. The full video showed that Phillips had not attempted to make his way to the Lincoln Memorial, but had instead marched into the group of students and stood in front of Sandmann, beating his drum and singing. The Post and other outlets immediately issued mea culpas, but the damage had been done: Sandmann had been branded a smirking racist and rendered a subject of scorn throughout the country. When Sandmann appeals, a three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals will consider his arguments. Given the procedural posture of this case—the motion to dismiss stage—Sandmann has solid grounds to argue for reversal. That’s because at that stage, the court must read the facts in the light most favorable to Sandmann, and if a reasonable jury could interpret the Post’s statements as defamatory, the court must allow the case to continue. An analysis of Judge Bertelsman’s opinion indicates that he overstepped his bounds in several areas and resolved factual disputes that should have been left for a jury to decide. {snip} If the Judge Is Right, All News Is Mere Opinion Here, there is a great irony to the judge’s decision. His analysis of the reporting rendered virtually every statement concerning the incident mere opinion. Judge Bertelsman even went so far as to declare The Washington Post’s reporting “rhetoric” and “hyperbole” Bertelsman is half-right. The Post and every other major media outlet now resort to rhetoric and hyperbole in reporting on all things Trump and conservative, such as the March for Life. And they regularly peddle opinion as fact. But the Post’s coverage of the encounter between Sandmann and Phillips, and the passages above, reported false facts. Those false facts subjected Sandmann to “public hatred, ridicule, contempt, aversion, or disgrace,” eliminating the need under Kentucky law to show the defamatory statements caused damages. 3
Hedge Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 Note that the Federalist article is from July, prior to this event, so there is no new news in it. 3
Tiberius Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 Another campaign promise of Trump falls by the wayside... Murray Energy Is 8th Coal Company in a Year to Seek Bankruptcy - The New York Times 1 day ago · Murray Energy, once a symbol of American mining prowess, has become the eighth coal company in a year to file for bankruptcy protection. The move on Tuesday is the latest sign that market forces are throttling the Trump administration's bid to save the industry.
Koko78 Posted October 31, 2019 Posted October 31, 2019 4 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Next discovery update in 6 years... 2 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: Why are you posting this here? Because Nicholas Sandmann will have to go elsewhere to get coal dust to make his blackface costume... or something.
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 31, 2019 Posted October 31, 2019 (edited) 30 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Next discovery update in 6 years... The smart thing for WaPo, CNN, etc to do is offer a large settlement to make it all go away. But, I doubt they are that smart and I expect them to go the Oberlin college route. Edited October 31, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 7, 2019 Posted November 7, 2019 I smell an appeal (can it be appealed?) or else some animals really are more equal than others. Covington Catholic students' defamation suit against Warren is dismissed A Kentucky judge has dropped presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D.-Mass., from a libel lawsuit filed by eight Covington Catholic High School students on grounds of sovereign immunity. The lawsuit, filed in August, named Warren along with a New Mexico congresswoman and 10 other public figures claiming they made defamatory comments about the students following their January encounter with Native Americans in Washington, D.C. Only Warren and Rep. Deborah Haaland, D.-N.M., were dismissed from the suit. “Sovereign immunity ‘extends to agencies of the United States’ or ‘federal officers [acting] in their official capacities,’” the decision by District Judge William O. Bertelsman read. Sovereign immunity is the doctrine that the U.S. government or those acting on its behalf may not be sued without its consent. </snip> 1
DC Tom Posted November 8, 2019 Posted November 8, 2019 5 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I smell an appeal (can it be appealed?) or else some animals really are more equal than others. Covington Catholic students' defamation suit against Warren is dismissed A Kentucky judge has dropped presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D.-Mass., from a libel lawsuit filed by eight Covington Catholic High School students on grounds of sovereign immunity. The lawsuit, filed in August, named Warren along with a New Mexico congresswoman and 10 other public figures claiming they made defamatory comments about the students following their January encounter with Native Americans in Washington, D.C. Only Warren and Rep. Deborah Haaland, D.-N.M., were dismissed from the suit. “Sovereign immunity ‘extends to agencies of the United States’ or ‘federal officers [acting] in their official capacities,’” the decision by District Judge William O. Bertelsman read. Sovereign immunity is the doctrine that the U.S. government or those acting on its behalf may not be sued without its consent. </snip> Not just sovereign immunity, but the "Biden Rule" - the new legal principle of "anyone running for office has blanket immunity from criminal or civil investigation." 1
dubs Posted November 8, 2019 Posted November 8, 2019 5 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Not just sovereign immunity, but the "Biden Rule" - the new legal principle of "anyone running for office has blanket immunity from criminal or civil investigation." infuriating 2
Uncle Joe Posted November 8, 2019 Posted November 8, 2019 5 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I smell an appeal (can it be appealed?) or else some animals really are more equal than others. Covington Catholic students' defamation suit against Warren is dismissed A Kentucky judge has dropped presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D.-Mass., from a libel lawsuit filed by eight Covington Catholic High School students on grounds of sovereign immunity. The lawsuit, filed in August, named Warren along with a New Mexico congresswoman and 10 other public figures claiming they made defamatory comments about the students following their January encounter with Native Americans in Washington, D.C. Only Warren and Rep. Deborah Haaland, D.-N.M., were dismissed from the suit. “Sovereign immunity ‘extends to agencies of the United States’ or ‘federal officers [acting] in their official capacities,’” the decision by District Judge William O. Bertelsman read. Sovereign immunity is the doctrine that the U.S. government or those acting on its behalf may not be sued without its consent. </snip> Aren't native Americans sovereign? She was only coming to the defense of her people.
KRC Posted November 8, 2019 Posted November 8, 2019 10 hours ago, DC Tom said: Not just sovereign immunity, but the "Biden Rule" - the new legal principle of "anyone running for office has blanket immunity from criminal or civil investigation." I hereby announce my candidacy for any office necessary. Not that I have anything to cover up, but I wanted to make sure that I cannot be prosecuted for anything I am about to do. 3
Buffalo_Gal Posted January 9, 2020 Posted January 9, 2020 I think this got lost, and in light of the CNN settlement and more people getting served, I thought it deserved a bump. 4 4
Foxx Posted January 9, 2020 Posted January 9, 2020 https://twitter.com/davereaboi/status/1215108962657480704 8 1
B-Man Posted January 9, 2020 Posted January 9, 2020 CNN’s Covington Settlement Shows Danger Of Agenda-Based Reporting by Jeff McCall Original Article . 1 1
Recommended Posts