Jump to content

TE Tyler Kroft (Bengals) to the Bills


sven233

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Misterbluesky said:

The TE move was horrible..period.

I guess I don't understand where you're coming from. I was quoting a post that said something along the lines of "I hope this isn't another Clay deal." My response was that it would be great if Kroft matched Clay's production in 15 and 16. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

I guess I don't understand where you're coming from. I was quoting a post that said something along the lines of "I hope this isn't another Clay deal." My response was that it would be great if Kroft matched Clay's production in 15 and 16. 

I got ya.

Peace.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ganesh said:

Hopefully he is not the next Charles Clay !!!

Well, Clay signed a 40 million dollar deal, Kroft, signed what amounts to 3 1 year deals, at about 6 mil per 

On 3/11/2019 at 10:31 PM, Teddy KGB said:

This guy stinks.     Beane should have went after Jared Cook 

In 2017, Kroft caught more TD’s than any Bill’s TE, ever. In a season of course. Grow up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What right does anyone have to downplay Kroft’s accomplishments as a receiving TE? There’s a lot of delusion here, and it’s borderline laughable. We all know he caught more TD’s in 2017 than any Bills TE ever caught in a season. And of course, based on many of your posts, he’s a blocking TE. So...he can block, and had what would’ve been one of the greatest season’s by a Bills TE....ever? Seems cool, and cheap, and he chose to come here. You know they have to do that too right? #knowthyself

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, atlbillsfan1975 said:

Now draft a TE in the third or later. If Nauta is there out of UGA, and he might be, in the last half of the third I hope the Bills go and get him. Nauta is going to be a much better pro than college player. 

Nauta tested pretty poorly.  I have major concerns about his athleticism.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kroft's highlights are impressive. He's big, athletic with quick feet, can run a route without embarrassing himself, and can block reasonably well. Raw talent wise he's the best we've had in years. Watch his 2017 highlight tape on YouTube and then criticize the damn reasonable deal he signed.

This is while playing for Lewis and dealing with the red rocket mind you. Of course he isn't Eifert, but he looks promising.

Edited by SmokinES3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

image: http://walterfootball.com/images/fball/billsb_logo.gif

billsb_logo.gif Bills sign TE Tyler Kroft (3 years, $18.75 million): FARMER FAIL, GRIGSON GAFFE, CERRATO SUCKAGE, BAALKE BLOOPER, CHIP TRAGEDY, KING CALAMITY Grade 
When this first flashed on the screen, I thought it said, "Bills sign TE Tyler Eifert to a 3-year, $18.75 million contract." That would have made more sense. It still would've been an overpay, but Eifert, despite his injury history, has great talent. 

Kroft, on the other hand? Not so much. He was ranked as a 1.5-star free agent, so like C.J. Uzomah, who was just overpaid by the Bengals, he's an average backup at best. Kroft's best season in the NFL thus far saw him catch 42 passes for 404 yards. He played in only five games last year, hauling in just four receptions. He's also not a very good blocker either. 

I don't know why teams are being dumb with tight ends. They should not be paid this much. An appropriate 3-year deal for Kroft would be worth $4-5 million; not $18.75 million! 

Read more: http://walterfootball.com/freeagentsigninggrades.php#ixzz5iFugVGp8

Read more at http://walterfootball.com/freeagentsigninggrades.php#PopJP9iFZSK9p4pd.99

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MAJBobby said:

image: http://walterfootball.com/images/fball/billsb_logo.gif

billsb_logo.gif Bills sign TE Tyler Kroft (3 years, $18.75 million): FARMER FAIL, GRIGSON GAFFE, CERRATO SUCKAGE, BAALKE BLOOPER, CHIP TRAGEDY, KING CALAMITY Grade 
When this first flashed on the screen, I thought it said, "Bills sign TE Tyler Eifert to a 3-year, $18.75 million contract." That would have made more sense. It still would've been an overpay, but Eifert, despite his injury history, has great talent. 

Kroft, on the other hand? Not so much. He was ranked as a 1.5-star free agent, so like C.J. Uzomah, who was just overpaid by the Bengals, he's an average backup at best. Kroft's best season in the NFL thus far saw him catch 42 passes for 404 yards. He played in only five games last year, hauling in just four receptions. He's also not a very good blocker either. 

I don't know why teams are being dumb with tight ends. They should not be paid this much. An appropriate 3-year deal for Kroft would be worth $4-5 million; not $18.75 million! 

Read more: http://walterfootball.com/freeagentsigninggrades.php#ixzz5iFugVGp8

Read more at http://walterfootball.com/freeagentsigninggrades.php#PopJP9iFZSK9p4pd.99

If I posted that...I'd get bashed.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...