Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Misterbluesky said:

The TE move was horrible..period.

I guess I don't understand where you're coming from. I was quoting a post that said something along the lines of "I hope this isn't another Clay deal." My response was that it would be great if Kroft matched Clay's production in 15 and 16. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

I guess I don't understand where you're coming from. I was quoting a post that said something along the lines of "I hope this isn't another Clay deal." My response was that it would be great if Kroft matched Clay's production in 15 and 16. 

I got ya.

Peace.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
10 hours ago, ganesh said:

Hopefully he is not the next Charles Clay !!!

Well, Clay signed a 40 million dollar deal, Kroft, signed what amounts to 3 1 year deals, at about 6 mil per 

On 3/11/2019 at 10:31 PM, Teddy KGB said:

This guy stinks.     Beane should have went after Jared Cook 

In 2017, Kroft caught more TD’s than any Bill’s TE, ever. In a season of course. Grow up.

Posted

What right does anyone have to downplay Kroft’s accomplishments as a receiving TE? There’s a lot of delusion here, and it’s borderline laughable. We all know he caught more TD’s in 2017 than any Bills TE ever caught in a season. And of course, based on many of your posts, he’s a blocking TE. So...he can block, and had what would’ve been one of the greatest season’s by a Bills TE....ever? Seems cool, and cheap, and he chose to come here. You know they have to do that too right? #knowthyself

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
On 3/11/2019 at 5:37 PM, DBilz2500 said:

Worthless as usual 

So dramatic!! He caught more td’s in 17’ than any Bills TE in any season EVER.

Edited by interpolitix
kindness
Posted (edited)

Being the top inline TE should help his production.  Big frame, athletic Te who can block is a hard find.  Pair him with Font and look out.  

Edited by Mat68
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
11 hours ago, ganesh said:

Hopefully he is not the next Charles Clay !!!

This contract is structured to walk away after a year but have two more if you like. Clays contract you were stuck with 4.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Now draft a TE in the third or later. If Nauta is there out of UGA, and he might be, in the last half of the third I hope the Bills go and get him. Nauta is going to be a much better pro than college player. 

Posted
3 hours ago, atlbillsfan1975 said:

Now draft a TE in the third or later. If Nauta is there out of UGA, and he might be, in the last half of the third I hope the Bills go and get him. Nauta is going to be a much better pro than college player. 

Nauta tested pretty poorly.  I have major concerns about his athleticism.     

Posted (edited)

Kroft's highlights are impressive. He's big, athletic with quick feet, can run a route without embarrassing himself, and can block reasonably well. Raw talent wise he's the best we've had in years. Watch his 2017 highlight tape on YouTube and then criticize the damn reasonable deal he signed.

This is while playing for Lewis and dealing with the red rocket mind you. Of course he isn't Eifert, but he looks promising.

Edited by SmokinES3
Posted

Is he more graceful than Scott Chandler or Tage Thompson?  That will tell me a lot.  IOW, is he a fat Tage, a skinny Chandler, or someone else altogether?

Posted

image: http://walterfootball.com/images/fball/billsb_logo.gif

billsb_logo.gif Bills sign TE Tyler Kroft (3 years, $18.75 million): FARMER FAIL, GRIGSON GAFFE, CERRATO SUCKAGE, BAALKE BLOOPER, CHIP TRAGEDY, KING CALAMITY Grade 
When this first flashed on the screen, I thought it said, "Bills sign TE Tyler Eifert to a 3-year, $18.75 million contract." That would have made more sense. It still would've been an overpay, but Eifert, despite his injury history, has great talent. 

Kroft, on the other hand? Not so much. He was ranked as a 1.5-star free agent, so like C.J. Uzomah, who was just overpaid by the Bengals, he's an average backup at best. Kroft's best season in the NFL thus far saw him catch 42 passes for 404 yards. He played in only five games last year, hauling in just four receptions. He's also not a very good blocker either. 

I don't know why teams are being dumb with tight ends. They should not be paid this much. An appropriate 3-year deal for Kroft would be worth $4-5 million; not $18.75 million! 

Read more: http://walterfootball.com/freeagentsigninggrades.php#ixzz5iFugVGp8

Read more at http://walterfootball.com/freeagentsigninggrades.php#PopJP9iFZSK9p4pd.99

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, MAJBobby said:

image: http://walterfootball.com/images/fball/billsb_logo.gif

billsb_logo.gif Bills sign TE Tyler Kroft (3 years, $18.75 million): FARMER FAIL, GRIGSON GAFFE, CERRATO SUCKAGE, BAALKE BLOOPER, CHIP TRAGEDY, KING CALAMITY Grade 
When this first flashed on the screen, I thought it said, "Bills sign TE Tyler Eifert to a 3-year, $18.75 million contract." That would have made more sense. It still would've been an overpay, but Eifert, despite his injury history, has great talent. 

Kroft, on the other hand? Not so much. He was ranked as a 1.5-star free agent, so like C.J. Uzomah, who was just overpaid by the Bengals, he's an average backup at best. Kroft's best season in the NFL thus far saw him catch 42 passes for 404 yards. He played in only five games last year, hauling in just four receptions. He's also not a very good blocker either. 

I don't know why teams are being dumb with tight ends. They should not be paid this much. An appropriate 3-year deal for Kroft would be worth $4-5 million; not $18.75 million! 

Read more: http://walterfootball.com/freeagentsigninggrades.php#ixzz5iFugVGp8

Read more at http://walterfootball.com/freeagentsigninggrades.php#PopJP9iFZSK9p4pd.99

If I posted that...I'd get bashed.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Misterbluesky said:

If I posted that...I'd get bashed.

 

Yeah, it's a waste of time. An appropriate deal for 4-5 million? What year? 1999?

Edited by first_and_ten
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, first_and_ten said:

 

Yeah, it's a waste of time. An appropriate deal for 4-5 million? What year? 1999?

I wanted Jared Cook,I'll bet he'll do pretty darn well if he signs w/the Saints.

×
×
  • Create New...