Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said:

 

 

Approximately 800% more blocking than we had last year.

 

 

All joking aside, it's really a matter of context. If it's a "yay, we signed Frank Gore so now the RB position is fixed" that's gonna suck. But if it's a "we signed frank gore as part one of a 2-3 part fix" that's better. 

Posted

Backup RB (or starter depending on Shady's status), great lockerroom presence, short term incentive laden contract.

 

I'm fine with this. Not going to stress either way on this if it happens or doesn't. 

Posted
3 hours ago, wppete said:

It was just reported on the NFL network that the Bills have interest in RB Frank Gore. 

 

Here is video:

 

 

I'm wondering if we are looking for the next in game retirement this one will come with a speech most likely after his first carry in first quarter of the first game.  Lol

Posted
2 hours ago, BuffAlone said:

Uh oh...maybe they need a vet to take Shady's place after they trade him?

 

Apparently the deal with Gore will be vets minimum and they'll cut Ivory I guess which will save them money

Posted
3 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

You have got to be kidding. 

They want to get even older at this position? I can’t. 

 

 

...but what about an AARP discount with a tight cap situation?.........

Posted
3 hours ago, ScottLaw said:

?

 

Why are people so surprised? These are the same guys who loved Nate Peterman.

 

 

And wouldn't pay AB Ashlon Jeffery money...

Posted
2 hours ago, Nanker said:

Frank Gore is without peer as a pass protection RB. I wanted him on The Bills a decade ago. He might be done, but he’d give our RBs some lessons on how to protect the QB. 

 

 

Shady is also without peer as a pass protector.

 

Just on the other end of the spectrum.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...