CEN-CAL17 Posted March 11, 2019 Posted March 11, 2019 (edited) Roethlisberger mentioned retirement a few years back, I’m sure it’s going to happen sooner rather than later. Drew Lock is a good QB, good size, strong arm, athletic etc. I expect Denver is going to take a hard look. Word is Mason Rudolph is not what they thought. Time will tell. But say Pittsburgh wants Drew Lock. I would be all for this trade down scenario. Would you? Buffalo Gives up picks 9 (1350) 113 (68) 148 (32) 159 (28) In Return from Pittsburgh Bills get 20 (850) 52 (380) 66 (260) that trade would leave the Bills with the #20 pick, 2 second round picks and 2 early third round picks. Leaves Bills with a 4th round. picks 20, 40, 52, 66, 75, 132 in the first four rounds. Teams I see moving up for Lock, jumping Denver would be Cincinnati, Miami, Tennessee and Pittsburgh. But Pittsburgh just gained more picks from Oakland to be more aggressive. Edited March 11, 2019 by 1ZAYDAY1 1 1
MrEpsYtown Posted March 11, 2019 Posted March 11, 2019 I'd be good with this. I think we are in prime position for quarterback trade ups. And I hope all the Mason Rudolph lovers realize the error in their thinking. 2
TOboy Posted March 11, 2019 Posted March 11, 2019 I'd love this...but I don't think it's likely. The Steelers have a few holes to fill after the last few days, and I doubt they'd trade away that much draft capital for Ben's replacement, particularly a year after drafting Rudolph. Hope I'm wrong though! 2
YoloinOhio Posted March 11, 2019 Posted March 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said: I'd be good with this. I think we are in prime position for quarterback trade ups. And I hope all the Mason Rudolph lovers realize the error in their thinking. You hate him so much 2
billsredneck1 Posted March 11, 2019 Posted March 11, 2019 so a poster says team not happy with rudolph....link? i'd bet if mason started with washington and juju their passing game would not regress much if at all. 1
Mark80 Posted March 11, 2019 Posted March 11, 2019 (edited) Come on man, at least use the correct first round pick for the Bills with this idea. Also, I don't think anyone is trading up for Lock. Watch some of his game film. Sure, a lot of talent on the face, but when you watch him, he just is so underwhelming. I can't imagine anyone trading up for him. Edited March 11, 2019 by Mark80
CEN-CAL17 Posted March 11, 2019 Author Posted March 11, 2019 Just now, TOboy said: I'd love this...but I don't think it's likely. The Steelers have a few holes to fill after the last few days, and I doubt they'd trade away that much draft capital for Ben's replacement, particularly a year after drafting Rudolph. Hope I'm wrong though! Even if it’s 9 for 20 & 52 I might take it. All depends on who’s there at 9. But there’s some studs to be had in The 2nd
Chuck Wagon Posted March 11, 2019 Posted March 11, 2019 Pass. I think there's a talent tier drop off between 9 and 20 that takes a premium pick to overcome. A late 2nd and moving up from the early 4th to early 3rd doesn't do it.
CEN-CAL17 Posted March 11, 2019 Author Posted March 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Mark80 said: Come on man, at least use the correct first round pick for the Bills with this outrageous idea. I meant to change that when creating the thread. The point value is correct
dje85 Posted March 11, 2019 Posted March 11, 2019 I wouldn't. I just don't see where the value in this is for us. The trade value charts may be correct but I feel a drop from 9 to 20 is worth more when the team trading up is moving up for a qb.
Chuck Wagon Posted March 11, 2019 Posted March 11, 2019 We got an extra 1st and a 3rd from KC to move from 10 to 27 in 2017. New Orleans gave up #27 / 2019 1st / #147 to go to 14 last year. I would want something similar. I know 20 isn't 27, but #20 / 2020 1st / 82 would be my target, though I'd settle for #82 being #122.
CEN-CAL17 Posted March 11, 2019 Author Posted March 11, 2019 4 minutes ago, Mark80 said: Come on man, at least use the correct first round pick for the Bills with this outrageous idea. Also, I don't think anyone is trading up for Lock. Watch some of his game film. Sure, a lot of talent on the face, but when you watch him is is so underwhelming. I can't imagine anyone trading up for him. I definitely see a trade up.... Not going to say it’s going to happen but Drew Lock is going round one. There’s a few teams right there between 10-20 who need a QB. If you like Lock, you go get him. Cincinnati May jump 2 spots give up hardly nothing. A 4th?
TOboy Posted March 11, 2019 Posted March 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, 1ZAYDAY1 said: I definitely see a trade up.... Not going to say it’s going to happen but Drew Lock is going round one. There’s a few teams right there between 10-20 who need a QB. If you like Lock, you go get him. Cincinnati May jump 2 spots give up hardly nothing. A 4th? To go from 9 to 11 could cost their second. Definitely not a 4th. You pay a premium near the top of the draft.
JoshAllenHasBigHands Posted March 11, 2019 Posted March 11, 2019 I don't think the draft chart is going to have any use in this draft. It doesn't look like there is a strong market to trade up. I think teams are going to have accept less than in past years to trade back.
CEN-CAL17 Posted March 11, 2019 Author Posted March 11, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, TOboy said: To go from 9 to 11 could cost their second. Definitely not a 4th. You pay a premium near the top of the draft. 9 & 11 is a 100pt difference. cincys pick in round 2 is 470pts. No way. 5 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said: I don't think the draft chart is going to have any use in this draft. It doesn't look like there is a strong market to trade up. I think teams are going to have accept less than in past years to trade back. It’s a general gauge. Teams that do move up tend to overpay some but I agree, some may take less Edited March 11, 2019 by 1ZAYDAY1
TOboy Posted March 11, 2019 Posted March 11, 2019 Just now, 1ZAYDAY1 said: 9 & 11 is a 100pt difference. cincys pick in round 2 is 470pts. No way. You can't always go by the chart, especially when a QB is involved. That said, I said could, both teams would need to be willing. I definitely can't see the Bills doing it for a 4.
CaptnCoke11 Posted March 11, 2019 Posted March 11, 2019 20 minutes ago, billsredneck1 said: so a poster says team not happy with rudolph....link? i'd bet if mason started with washington and juju their passing game would not regress much if at all. Just making ***** up
CEN-CAL17 Posted March 11, 2019 Author Posted March 11, 2019 1 minute ago, TOboy said: You can't always go by the chart, especially when a QB is involved. That said, I said could, both teams would need to be willing. I definitely can't see the Bills doing it for a 4. Definitely for a QB they could overpay. I’d take their 3rd in a heartbeat. Or swap our 3rd for their 2nd. 1
MrEpsYtown Posted March 11, 2019 Posted March 11, 2019 30 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: You hate him so much I really should just let it go! But people were arguing that we might have to trade up into the top ten to grab him before New England does. I thought I was in bizarro world, because I thought he was a second-third round pick. Lots of hyperbole this time of year! 1
Recommended Posts