Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I'm hearing the jets are interested but don't have enough picks.  That's why they are determined to trade back from 3 and gain enough fire power to trade with Seattle 

Edited by Rufridr101
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Rufridr101 said:

I'm hearing the jets are interested but don't have enough picks.  That's why they are determined to trade back from 3 and gain enough fire power to trade with Seattle 

I could see this. Jets move down from 3, recoup some of their sacrificed picks from last year, then make a move for Clark with a not so high first rounder. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said:

 

LOL Ian R.

You know...it is draft time. This idea about Clark is not totally unreasonable. We do know that at least attempts were made for some kind of dialogue.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Great player. Great baggage. Great cost. 

Its a definite NO for me. I'd rather look elsewhere for DE help, take my chances, and save my capital for next time. JMO

Posted
1 hour ago, Rocket94 said:

You know...it is draft time. This idea about Clark is not totally unreasonable. We do know that at least attempts were made for some kind of dialogue.

My comment had nothing to do about Clark, just about Ian R and his reputation right now

Posted
7 minutes ago, CNY315 said:

 

 

Then he won't be a Bill. No chance Beane moves a top 10 pick for him

Posted
32 minutes ago, CNY315 said:

 

I'm out at #9.

 

Perhaps Buffalo trades #9 to Green Bay and gets 12 & 30,

Pick a guy like Hock at 12 and then trade 30 to Seattle for Clark?

Posted
14 minutes ago, RocCityRoller said:

I'm out at #9.

 

Perhaps Buffalo trades #9 to Green Bay and gets 12 & 30,

Pick a guy like Hock at 12 and then trade 30 to Seattle for Clark?

If you're of the belief that trading down from #9 can get you picks 12 and 30 than you're either the biggest Bill's homer or you dont understand the trade value chart.

 

That would be an all time fleecing on the Bills part.  The Bills would be happy to get a 3rd rounder to move back 3 spots.

Posted
58 minutes ago, CNY315 said:

 

 

Interesting choice of words, if he were to be traded "before Thursday's draft." Perhaps meaning that if there's no takers by then, they'll accept a 2nd. I still think the most sensible trade would be switching 1sts with them.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Estro said:

If you're of the belief that trading down from #9 can get you picks 12 and 30 than you're either the biggest Bill's homer or you dont understand the trade value chart.

 

As a public service...

 

http://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp

 

RD1   RD2   RD3   RD4        RD5   RD6   RD7  
PK/TM VAL PK/TM VAL PK/TM VAL PK/TM VAL PK/TM VAL PK/TM VAL PK/TM VAL
  1  ARI 3000   33  ARI 580   65  ARI 265   103  ARI 88   139  ARI 36   174  ARI 21.4   215  TB 5
  2  SF 2600   34  IND 560   66  PIT 260   104  SF 86   140  OAK 35.5   175  PIT 21   216  KC 4.6
  3  NYJ 2200   35  OAK 550   67  SF 255   105  NYJ 84   141  PIT 35   176  SF 20.6   217  NYJ 4.2
  4  OAK 1800   36  SF 540   68  NYJ 250   106  OAK 82   142  NYG 34.5   177  NO 20.2   218  OAK 3.8
  5  TB 1700   37  NYG 530   69  JAX 245   107  TB 80   143  NYG 34   178  JAX 19.8   219  PIT 3.4
  6  NYG 1600   38  JAX 520   70  TB 240   108  NYG 78   144  CLE 33.5   179  ARI 19.4   220  HOU 3
  7  JAX 1500   39  TB 510   71  DEN 235   109  JAX 76   145  TB 33   180  NYG 19   221  CLE 2.6
  8  DET 1400   40  BUF 500   72  CIN 230   110  CIN 74   146  DET 32.6   181  BUF 18.6   222  CHI 2.3
  9  BUF 1350   41  DEN 490   73  NE 225   111  DET 72   147  BUF 32.2   182  DEN 18.2   223  CIN 2
  10  DEN 1300   42  CIN 480   74  BUF 220   112  BUF 70   148  DEN 31.8   183  CIN 17.8   224  DET 1.7
  11  CIN 1250   43  DET 470   75  GB 215   113  BAL 68   149  CIN 31.4   184  DET 17.4   225  BUF 1.4
  12  GB 1200   44  GB 460   76  WAS 210   114  GB 66   150  GB 31   185  GB 17   226  GB 1.1
  13  MIA 1150   45  ATL 450   77  CAR 205   115  CAR 64   151  MIA 30.6   186  ATL 16.6   227  WAS 1
  14  ATL 1100   46  WAS 440   78  MIA 200   116  MIA 62   152  ATL 30.2   187  CAR 16.2   228  BUF 1
  15  WAS 1050   47  CAR 430   79  ATL 195   117  ATL 60   153  WAS 29.8   188  TEN 15.8   229  DET 1
  16  CAR 1000   48  MIA 420   80  CLE 190   118  GB 58   154  CAR 29.4   189  CLE 15.4   230  ATL 1
  17  NYG 950   49  CLE 410   81  MIN 185   119  CLE 56   155  CLE 29   190  MIN 15   231  NO 1
  18  MIN 900   50  MIN 400   82  TEN 180   120  MIN 54   156  DEN 28.6   191  BAL 14.6   232  NYG 1
  19  TEN 875   51  TEN 390   83  PIT 175   121  TEN 52   157  TEN 28.2   192  PIT 14.2   233  MIA 1
  20  PIT 850   52  PIT 380   84  SEA 170   122  PIT 50   158  BUF 27.8   193  BAL 13.8   234  MIA 1
  21  SEA 800   53  PHI 370   85  BAL 165   123  BAL 49   159  SEA 27.4   194  GB 13.4   235  OAK 1
  22  BAL 780   54  HOU 360   86  HOU 160   124  SEA 48   160  BAL 27   195  HOU 13   236  JAX 1
  23  HOU 760   55  HOU 350   87  CHI 155   125  DEN 47   161  HOU 26.6   196  NYJ 12.6   237  DEN 1
  24  OAK 740   56  NE 340   88  DET 150   126  CHI 46   162  CHI 26.2   197  PHI 12.2   238  CHI 1
  25  PHI 720   57  PHI 330   89  IND 145   127  PHI 45   163  PHI 25.8   198  CIN 11.8   239  NE 1
  26  IND 700   58  DAL 320   90  DAL 140   128  DAL 44   164  IND 25.4   199  IND 11.4   240  IND 1
  27  OAK 680   59  IND 310   91  LAC 136   129  IND 43   165  DAL 25   200  LAC 11   241  DAL 1
  28  LAC 660   60  LAC 300   92  KC 132   130  LAC 42   166  LAC 24.6   201  KC 10.6   242  LAC 1
  29  KC 640   61  KC 292   93  NYJ 128   131  BUF 41   167  KC 24.2   202  NO 10.2   243  NE 1
  30  GB 620   62  NO 284   94  LAR 124   132  NYG 40   168  NO 23.8   203  LAR 9.8   244  NO 1
  31  LAR 600   63  KC 276   95  NYG 120   133  LAR 39   169  LAR 23.4   204  DET 9.4   245  NYG 1
  32  NE 590   64  NE 270   96  WAS 116   134  NE 38.5   170  CLE 23   205  NE 9   246  NE 1
                97  NE 112   135  IND 38   171  NYG 22.6   206  WAS 8.6   247  MIN 1
                98  JAX 108   136  DAL 37.5   172  ATL 22.2   207  PIT 8.2   248  ARI 1
                99  LAR 104   137  ATL 37   173  WAS 21.8   208  TB 7.8   249  ARI 1
                100  CAR 100   138  PHI 36.5          209  MIN 7.4   250  MIN 1
                101  NE 96                 210  CIN 7   251  LAR 1
                102  BAL 92                 211  CIN 6.6   252  NE 1
                                     212  SF 6.2   253  WAS 1
                                     213  CIN 5.8   254  ARI 1
                                     214  KC 5.4       
Posted (edited)
On 4/17/2019 at 7:24 PM, BuffAlone said:

Frank Clark...convicted felon for home invasion. 

Frank Clark...convicted on DV and related charges.

Frank Clark....tweeted threats to a female reporter covering his DV.

Frank Clark...allegedly told hotel staff "I'll hit you like I hit her."

Frank Clark...does not meet process. Frank Clark will not be welcomed into the process, or building for that matter, by Terry OR Kim. This thread is for naught

National FOOTBALL league. Not the national Good Samaritan league. 

 

He was a really dumb jerk of a college kid.... Dude has been clean as a whistle for over 5 years now. He never threatened a reporter. He said she could have job cleaning his fish tank when her career was over. 

 

Get over it man. 

 

If the asking price is right, you bring him in.  No brainer. 

Edited by Stank_Nasty
Posted
1 minute ago, Stank_Nasty said:

National FOOTBALL league. Not the national Good Samaritan league. 

 

He was a really dumb jerk of a college kid.... Dude has been clean as a whistle for over 5 years now. He never threatened a reporter. He said she could have job cleaning his fish tank when her career was over. 

 

Get over it man. 

 

If the asking price is right, you bring him in.  No brainer. 

I don't need to get over anything. I don't have a personal beef with the dude. I realize he's a great player. My only point is our owners / coach/ GM will not sign off on a 1st rd pick, 17 mil per year convicted felon. It simply won't happen. Especially during the draft. 

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, BuffAlone said:

I don't need to get over anything. I don't have a personal beef with the dude. I realize he's a great player. My only point is our owners / coach/ GM will not sign off on a 1st rd pick, 17 mil per year convicted felon. It simply won't happen. Especially during the draft. 

If their only reasoning for not wanting him is because he got convicted of a felony as a college kid, meanwhile staying out of trouble ever since, then I would  seriously worry about them running the franchise.  There may be plenty of other factors in there that we don’t know about as they have access to info we never will.  but if your reasoning is the main reason why then I would be worried about the intelligence of who’s running the team. 

 

Seems you may be projecting your own definition of “process” here...... I would hope they are smarter than that. And I’m confident they are 

Edited by Stank_Nasty
Posted
41 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

Interesting choice of words, if he were to be traded "before Thursday's draft." Perhaps meaning that if there's no takers by then, they'll accept a 2nd. I still think the most sensible trade would be switching 1sts with them.

That's what I think. The raiders have cap space? If not pick 40 and 131 pick 158

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Estro said:

If you're of the belief that trading down from #9 can get you picks 12 and 30 than you're either the biggest Bill's homer or you dont understand the trade value chart.

 

That would be an all time fleecing on the Bills part.  The Bills would be happy to get a 3rd rounder to move back 3 spots.

wow that was angry... didn't have Jimmy Johnson's trade chart in front of me. Its assumed other picks would be included.

 

bring it down a level pal

Edited by RocCityRoller
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said:

If their only reasoning for not wanting him is because he got convicted of a felony as a college kid, meanwhile staying out of trouble ever since, then I would  seriously worry about them running the franchise.  There may be plenty of other factors in there that we don’t know about as they have access to info we never will.  but if your reasoning is the main reason why then I would be worried about the intelligence of who’s running the team. 

 

Seems you may be projecting your own definition of “process” here...... I would hope they are smarter than that. And I’m confident they are 

He hasn't stayed out of trouble since. And his price is too high. I'm not projecting any process because, well...I'm not exactly sure what it is yet, but I'll trust it. That said, regardless of MY opinion of him, which I'm not trying to convey at all, I strongly believe that our team pres, owner, coach, GM would not pay for his services at such a high price, and baggage included. A 1st rd pick, and 17 mil a year is a high price for anything other than a squeaky clean, highly productive( not that he's not), face of the franchise type player. That's just my opinion as to how I think this F.O. operates

Posted

He has off field issies and wants 20+ on a new contract. Nobody is giving more than a late first.

 

Bills give 2nd and Shaq for F Clark. 

Bills give a 5th and 7th for G McCoy. 

 

Draft Hockenson at 9.  Myles Boykin ND WR and Kaleb Mcgary Wsh OT

×
×
  • Create New...