dave mcbride Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 3 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: He made the pro bowl this year. He’s really good. ... but in decline: https://www.baltimorebeatdown.com/2019/3/5/18252353/ravens-cut-s-eric-weddle-nfl-free-agency-news-safety-released-baltimore
gonzo1105 Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 He's in decline but he is still pretty good. If you can get him on a one year deal for decent money i'd take him for his leadership abilities alone and for the depth but I'm pretty sure he will either A. Go to a contender that can win a SB or B. Go somewhere where he can start. Neither of them are Buffalo unfortunately.
Your Brown Eye Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 Only if he shaves, the beard doesn't fit the clean cut guys needed for the Process
freddyjj Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 7 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: He made the pro bowl this year. He’s really good. Made it on rep/name only this past year, stats are very blah Game Game Def Def Def Def Def Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Tack Tack Tack Tack Tack Age Tm Pos No. G GS Int Yds TD Lng PD FF Fmb FR Yds TD Sk Comb Solo Ast TFL QBHits Sfty AV 33 BAL FS 32 16 16 0 0 0 0 3 1.0 68 54 14 2 4 9 No picks, no forced fumbles, no recoveries, no TDs and one sack with 3 passes defended. 68 TT Poyer Game Game Def Def Def Def Def Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Tack Tack Tack Tack Tack Age Tm Pos No. G GS Int Yds TD Lng PD FF Fmb FR Yds TD Sk Comb Solo Ast TFL QBHits Sfty AV 27 BUF FS 21 16 16 4 11 0 11 6 1 0 1 0 0 2.0 100 73 27 9 3 I keep the younger dude with better stats. 3
Seasons1992 Posted March 6, 2019 Author Posted March 6, 2019 3 minutes ago, Your Brown Eye said: Only if he shaves, the beard doesn't fit the clean cut guys needed for the Process Finally, someone who gets the thread! 1
C.Biscuit97 Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 Just now, freddyjj said: Made it on rep/name only this past year, stats are very blah Game Game Def Def Def Def Def Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Tack Tack Tack Tack Tack Age Tm Pos No. G GS Int Yds TD Lng PD FF Fmb FR Yds TD Sk Comb Solo Ast TFL QBHits Sfty AV 33 BAL FS 32 16 16 0 0 0 0 3 1.0 68 54 14 2 4 9 No picks, no forced fumbles, no recoveries, no TDs and one sack with 3 passes defended. 68 TT Poyer Game Game Def Def Def Def Def Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Tack Tack Tack Tack Tack Age Tm Pos No. G GS Int Yds TD Lng PD FF Fmb FR Yds TD Sk Comb Solo Ast TFL QBHits Sfty AV 27 BUF FS 21 16 16 4 11 0 11 6 1 0 1 0 0 2.0 100 73 27 9 3 I keep the younger dude with better stats. I don’t really disagree but you know INTs isn’t always the best way to evaluate defensive backs right? Trust me, I love our pair. But Weddle did start for the number 1 defense in the nfl. He’s really good even if he is aging. That said, not a big need and he will likely take a team friendly deal with a SB contender.
formerlyofCtown Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 Because we dont need him. We have the #1 pass D in the NFL due to one of the best secondaries in the NFL. The only position we need is a hybrid S. Which he does not fit the bill for. You may see us grab another LB and use Milano in that role. 2 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: I don’t really disagree but you know INTs isn’t always the best way to evaluate defensive backs right? Trust me, I love our pair. But Weddle did start for the number 1 defense in the nfl. He’s really good even if he is aging. That said, not a big need and he will likely take a team friendly deal with a SB contender. We have the number 1 pass D in the NFL. He also has other stats as well as Ints. 100 tackles, 2 sacks....
freddyjj Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 2 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: I don’t really disagree but you know INTs isn’t always the best way to evaluate defensive backs right? Trust me, I love our pair. But Weddle did start for the number 1 defense in the nfl. He’s really good even if he is aging. That said, not a big need and he will likely take a team friendly deal with a SB contender. Poyer had 33% more tackles, 7 more TFLs and more QB hits and sacks too. Weddle was exposed in coverage last year. Father time is undefeated. Andrew Wingard is name to watch in draft at S
gobills1212 Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 If ur going to ask people discuss, you could at least set the table a little better and provide some context. This is just lazy fandom. Its not face book and as others have brought you up to speed, explaining why YOU think this would be a good idea would have been the only redeeming qlty. Why should someone discuss something almost seemingly to amuse you?
White Linen Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 16 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: I don’t really disagree but you know INTs isn’t always the best way to evaluate defensive backs right? Trust me, I love our pair. But Weddle did start for the number 1 defense in the nfl. He’s really good even if he is aging. That said, not a big need and he will likely take a team friendly deal with a SB contender. It's not a need. Depth maybe, but we have no need for a starter.
C.Biscuit97 Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 23 minutes ago, formerlyofCtown said: Because we dont need him. We have the #1 pass D in the NFL due to one of the best secondaries in the NFL. The only position we need is a hybrid S. Which he does not fit the bill for. You may see us grab another LB and use Milano in that role. We have the number 1 pass D in the NFL. He also has other stats as well as Ints. 100 tackles, 2 sacks.... Oh yeah, for sure. No disagreement. I do believe our pass defense was slightly improved because a bunch of games where we got blown out and teams were just killing the clock. But agreed Weddle is not a need. I have a soft spot for him because I was huge fan of his out of college. He will have no problems catching on to a team though.
Mountain Man Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 (edited) 50 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: He made the pro bowl this year. He’s really good. People judge players off Pro Bowl appearances? Wow. You do realise the Pro Bowl is simply a popularity contest? Edited March 6, 2019 by Mountain Man
formerlyofCtown Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: Oh yeah, for sure. No disagreement. I do believe our pass defense was slightly improved because a bunch of games where we got blown out and teams were just killing the clock. But agreed Weddle is not a need. I have a soft spot for him because I was huge fan of his out of college. He will have no problems catching on to a team though. Even when they tried it was tough. The only thing I want for our D is a penetrating DT. If that was all they added to it I would be happy. I would like to somehow complete the D but I could live with just that. What I mean with complete the D is we have no hybrid S. I dont think Weddle could fill that role or I would say grab him. I do think Barr would allow Milano to play that role. Barr will get harassed a bit in the lockerroom for a bit though. I think we all know why Lol. Edited March 6, 2019 by formerlyofCtown
machine gun kelly Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 The #1 pass defense, #2 overall defense vs. the 31st offense makes choices obvious. Everything gets better with a stud O Line and they have the pics and $ to do it. As someone stated pic you’re offensive toys after LT with #9. Lots of excellent TE’s. Depending on the analyst, there are 3-4 TE’s who have first round grades. The two Iowa kids, the AL guy, and the BC kid.
Spiderweb Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 3 hours ago, Seasons1992 said: Discuss. If you wish to start a discussion, begin with yourself....
billsbackto81 Posted March 6, 2019 Posted March 6, 2019 2 hours ago, freddyjj said: Made it on rep/name only this past year, stats are very blah Game Game Def Def Def Def Def Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Tack Tack Tack Tack Tack Age Tm Pos No. G GS Int Yds TD Lng PD FF Fmb FR Yds TD Sk Comb Solo Ast TFL QBHits Sfty AV 33 BAL FS 32 16 16 0 0 0 0 3 1.0 68 54 14 2 4 9 No picks, no forced fumbles, no recoveries, no TDs and one sack with 3 passes defended. 68 TT Poyer Game Game Def Def Def Def Def Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Tack Tack Tack Tack Tack Age Tm Pos No. G GS Int Yds TD Lng PD FF Fmb FR Yds TD Sk Comb Solo Ast TFL QBHits Sfty AV 27 BUF FS 21 16 16 4 11 0 11 6 1 0 1 0 0 2.0 100 73 27 9 3 I keep the younger dude with better stats. God I hate it when stats are posted like this. I feel like I'm watching The Matrix. 1
HenryJones Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 I have a reason as to why it would make sense. To play chess with Tom Brady, by disguising coverages. Replace a great leader in Kyle with him. Assist our young secondary (Tre/Levi/Taron).
Recommended Posts