Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, formerlyofCtown said:

Aaron Maybin.  Our issues were not on the edge.  We need a 3 Tech DT.  Now if we could get a beast of a DE Id take it.  But I want a Doberman, not a min-pin who soaked himself in water to look bigger.


Scroll up in the thread just a little. We've already had the Aaron Maybin discussion. 

And the Bills' issues weren't on the edge? Really? Buffalo's starting right and left end COMBINED for 11 sacks on the year. The Bills finished 26th in sacks. Lawson and Hughes both have expiring contracts at the end of next season and Hughes is 31.

I agree that we need a 3T,  as well, but that's a separate discussion. To say that the Bills don't have a need at edge rusher is just not correct, in my opinion.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Brian Burns wouldn’t even be in my top five edge rushers in this draft.  I expect a much better player to be available at 9.  I’d prefer Allen, Gary, Sweat and Ferrell (in that order) to Burns, but that’s JMO.

Posted
11 hours ago, 947 said:

Watching Burns in his FSU highlights, he looks way too skinny to play 4-3 DE. I hate to say it, but he is built like Maybin was at Notre Dame- who ironically also played at 230lbs & bulked up to almost 250 for the combine.

 

I know Burns is a much more complete player than Maybin could ever dream of being, but the body comparisons are close.

 

You don’t understand, this kid has that quick first step... 

Posted

I think he’s a tremendous 3-4 olb prospect.  Top 10 type talent.  Not sure if he’ll ever NOT be a liability vs the run playing 4-3 DE.  Can he play SLB?

 

I don’t think he fits with our scheme, but if we can mix things up to utilaizr his strengths, he could be the difference maker our pass rush needs 

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

He is easily an option for us at 9 and has been IMO.  There are several guys who could or should be there at 9 I would love taking, so pretty sure I will be thrilled with our pick there no matter what.  I trust Beane not to do a "Whitner" or Oakland Raider type blunder, so its going to be someone like Burns, Oliver, Gary, Metcalf, Allen, Sweat, etc.  Hard to predict who falls to us, but pretty sure we are going to get one helluva prospect at #9.

Trade bk could be in play to if anything the combine opened up more options for trade other then QBs.

 

Hopefully the Pack move up from 12 to 9 and we swap there late first for our 2nd. #29 for #40 . 

 

#13 - Hock, Sweat, Burns maybe even Wilkins who I think the Bills love. 

 

#29- Fant , Risner or Little 

Edited by BillsFan1988
Posted
11 hours ago, Logic said:


Scroll up in the thread just a little. We've already had the Aaron Maybin discussion. 

And the Bills' issues weren't on the edge? Really? Buffalo's starting right and left end COMBINED for 11 sacks on the year. The Bills finished 26th in sacks. Lawson and Hughes both have expiring contracts at the end of next season and Hughes is 31.

I agree that we need a 3T,  as well, but that's a separate discussion. To say that the Bills don't have a need at edge rusher is just not correct, in my opinion.

Hughes is one of the best Passrushers in the NFL.  Dont be surprised if he gets an extension.

 

Get a penetrating DT and some of those pressures turn into sacks at both DE spots.

6 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

I am pretty excited about the idea Ed Oliver falls to us because he wanted to put on a jacket. 

I really would like that pick.  We could actually move him around to exploit weaknesses on the other teams OL.

Posted

As of right now, I don't think too many pundits would think he's the BPA at #9.  That could change in another 6 weeks.  Of course, the opinions of pundits don't count for that much either.  The only opinion that does is Brandon Beane's.

Posted
22 hours ago, BringBackFlutie said:

All I have to say to you is that I KNOW you don't watch enough of Jason Taylor to make a comparison. I effing know it.

Or Maybin like... You choose...

Posted

Comparing prospects to former players is an inexact science at best.  They each have their own set of skills, athletic gifts and experience.  The size comparison with Aaron Maybin is interesting, but there is no way to measure how similar he is to Maybin as a player, or to Jason Taylor for that matter.  I don't know whether Burns will succeed or not in the NFL, but it won't be because Maybin busted and Taylor was terrific. 

Posted
3 hours ago, TigerJ said:

Comparing prospects to former players is an inexact science at best.  They each have their own set of skills, athletic gifts and experience.  The size comparison with Aaron Maybin is interesting, but there is no way to measure how similar he is to Maybin as a player, or to Jason Taylor for that matter.  I don't know whether Burns will succeed or not in the NFL, but it won't be because Maybin busted and Taylor was terrific. 

I think it is laziness but it is also inexact for the reasons you stated.

Posted

You don't typically see good edge rushers or QB's make it to FA. If you have a top 10 pick and already have your QB a Edge Rusher is pretty much a no brainer if one drops. If just 2 QB's get drafted before our pick things will get very interesting.

Posted

I like him as a prospect, but I'm leery of the production. 8.5, 4.5, and 10 sacks for a pass rusher with his build are not impressive. Didn't put up big TFL numbers either.

Posted
8 minutes ago, RiotAct said:

Beane’s going Offensive Line or Wide Receiver with that 1st.

 

Why? Because of need? Or because they are the best football players? 

 

Is it a coincidence that you happen to name our two greatest needs, despite the specific talent this draft is supposed to have?

×
×
  • Create New...