whatdrought Posted February 28, 2019 Posted February 28, 2019 15 minutes ago, SDS said: These are two awful, dreadful takes. Do you know what the world needs less of? People behind keyboards questioning other people's pain. But you both are probably right - her dry eyes were probably exactly equivalent to your experiences with contacts. Exactly. No difference. She must have been mentally ill. It's the only reasonable conclusion. I disagree. There are people who lose their sight altogether and do not resort to suicide. This is a sad story no doubt, but the question must be asked if there are other factors that caused this. I would also be very curious to hear what treatment she sought about the issues she was having (both physically as a result of the surgery, and emotionally/mentally as a result of the pain.) I don't think either of the posters you quoted were indeed questioning her pain, but rather were pointing out that this in a vacuum does not seem like something that would drive a reasonable person to suicide. Furthermore, the article and the comments of the family seem to indicate (based entirely on my opinion alone) that some form of legal action may be taken against the provider who did the surgery. If that's the case, I expect much more to be discovered about this young woman and why this was ultimately what she saw as her only option. 2 1
KD in CA Posted February 28, 2019 Posted February 28, 2019 Just now, plenzmd1 said: lord, I love that movie...still one of the greatest ever made! In the Shady McCoy fiasco, we would have needed a new bet on 7th out of 8 entries? It really is....just great in every aspect. It's one of the handful I have to watch start to finish every few years. Shady must have gotten blocked out....kinda like the entire 2018 season. 1
billsfanmiami(oh) Posted February 28, 2019 Posted February 28, 2019 2 hours ago, plenzmd1 said: Ahh, of that you can never be sure..many thousands of women may have dismissed you outright ...you just never know. I mean, look @mead107 , he wears glesses and thousnads of women rejected him in his single days. I will always say it was the best $3K I ever spent, and that was in October of 2000, so almost 19 years ago. I mean there are risks with everything we do in life, many many of them we do just to have more fun or look better. According to the lineked article, complications are less than 1% of procedures. Not to make light of this, but she killed her self appx 8 weeks after surgery because she had dry eyes and was seeing starbursts? And she has two young children? That ain't adding up to a mentally stable person before the surgery in my mind's eye. This article/story on ABC is designed for clicks and shock value in my opinion..weather person commits suicide doesn't have quite the drawing card That at was my first thought. Horrible story and obviously can’t walk in someone else’s shoes but I personally can’t fathom leaving behind my child. Especially for something like that.
The Senator Posted February 28, 2019 Posted February 28, 2019 (edited) 6 hours ago, SDS said: When people ask me about this operation - this is the nightmare I refer to. The risks may indeed be "Rare". The question is if the quality of life improvement is worth that risk. https://people.com/tv/meteorologist-jessica-starr-suicide-family-speaks-out/ This is a truly tragic tale of a troubled woman. As an early investor in a Summit Technology, a pioneer in the field of laser radial keratotomy, I was familiar with the procedure, but never found glasses or contacts inconvenient. I certainly didn’t want anyone but myself sticking their fingers, or surgical devices, near my eyes. I finally had to succumb to that phobia when I developed cataracts. Facing blindness, doc installed those nifty muti focal lenses, and my vision is 20/15, w/out glasses. I suppose someone whose job is on television might lead them to make certain cosmetic decisions, as this poor woman did. I would recommend against the operation. You never know what can go wrong. Glasses can be fun, so can contacts - you can even change colors! . Edited February 28, 2019 by The Senator
Augie Posted February 28, 2019 Posted February 28, 2019 I have no idea what she was going through, or why, but two kids lost their mom. That is tragic.
Doc Posted February 28, 2019 Posted February 28, 2019 7 hours ago, SDS said: These are two awful, dreadful takes. Do you know what the world needs less of? People behind keyboards questioning other people's pain. But you both are probably right - her dry eyes were probably exactly equivalent to your experiences with contacts. Exactly. No difference. She must have been mentally ill. It's the only reasonable conclusion. She was mentally ill: she was depressed and her family missed the warning signs. And I had the procedure and it was one of the best things I ever did. Fortunately I didn't suffer a bad outcome but I tell people who ask me about it that while it worked great for me, you're taking a risk.
mead107 Posted March 1, 2019 Posted March 1, 2019 7 hours ago, plenzmd1 said: Ahh, of that you can never be sure..many thousands of women may have dismissed you outright ...you just never know. I mean, look @mead107 , he wears glesses and thousnads of women rejected him in his single days. I hated wearing glasses when I was dating girls when I was young before the wife. They would always be smudged. Never took them of when I went down to the Y. I know only one person that had a problem after surgery. One eye was a problem (dry) for around 7 months. Good now.
4BillsintheBurgh Posted March 1, 2019 Posted March 1, 2019 My wife had it done around 2002 and has enjoyed it. We did TLC I think? It was the same one Tiger Woods had done, I was okay spending the extra money considering. I had a buddy go a cheap route and he ended up having issues which he actually had to go get corrected in Florida. I guess the guy down there was the best and my buddy wasn't taking any more chances. Luckily it worked out for him.
nkreed Posted March 1, 2019 Posted March 1, 2019 First off the loss of life is tragic. I had not heard of the SMILE technology as compared to LASIK until that article. That's not too surprising since I had my surgery about 12 years ago (it was so worth it for me). The SMILE technique is still newer, but it doesn't seem too complicated. It's unfortunate we won't know the true reason for her dry eyes. Considering the flap method of LASIK vs the 4mm incision of the SMILE, I would bet big money that the greater surface area of injury to the cornea would lead to drier eyes. Also, fun fact that I haven't looked up to see if it's true through 2018, but through 2017 in all of the LASIK procedures preformed in the US there was not one single case of loss of vision! (Save for the few moments your vision is black during the correction). That's a lot of surgeries! LASIK was first introduced in 1991.
LeGOATski Posted March 1, 2019 Posted March 1, 2019 Yeah, I'll just stick with my glasses. Thank you, next.
nkreed Posted March 1, 2019 Posted March 1, 2019 2 abstracts of some articles of the efficacy of SMILE v LASIK. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28486721 tldr; LASIK outperformed SMILE in all visual acuity testing at the 3 month mark. No discussion on side effects. Published May '17 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28486720 tldr; at 6 months, LASIK has better predictability than SMILE. Published May '17
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 1, 2019 Posted March 1, 2019 (edited) I have worn glasses/contacts my whole life... At 51 I don't need them up close anymore. I thank this site and my cellphone. I just take my glasses off under 4 feet away. 17 minutes ago, nkreed said: 2 abstracts of some articles of the efficacy of SMILE v LASIK. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28486721 tldr; LASIK outperformed SMILE in all visual acuity testing at the 3 month mark. No discussion on side effects. Published May '17 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28486720 tldr; at 6 months, LASIK has better predictability than SMILE. Published May '17 SMILE is less invasive. I guess you have to be leary of that. Why cut corners with something that important... Even know it seems logical to go the less invasive route... Still gotta do things the "right way." Wiping your azz 1/2 way is less invasive. See how far that gets you! ? Edited March 1, 2019 by ExiledInIllinois 1
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 1, 2019 Posted March 1, 2019 You'd have to be insane to say "yeah, you know what? Go ahead and shoot laser beams at my eyeballs." Hard pass.
Turk71 Posted March 1, 2019 Posted March 1, 2019 (edited) I read where she told her husband it felt like her eyes were no longer communicating properly with her brain. She could not visualize and 'see' the way she used to. Seeing is the brain being able to interpret information received from the eye via the optic nerve. The lens focuses light onto the rods and cones that transmit to the brain, but her brain was not able to interpret and visualize the info properly for whatever reason. Not surmising how that results in killing yourself, but it sounds way beyond just the discomfort of dry eyes. Tragic whatever the case may be. Edited March 1, 2019 by Turk71
DC Tom Posted March 1, 2019 Posted March 1, 2019 12 hours ago, plenzmd1 said: you saying killing yourself when you have two small kids because your eyes hurt is a rational reaction to pain and some vision problems? I know you don't like Lasix, but to say she killed herself cause she had Lasik is pretty far afield no? You've probably never lived with the level of pain she had to deal with. This isn't eye strain. Imagine having hydrogen peroxide dripped in to your eyes, all day, every day, for the rest of your life. Attributing "rational" reactions to that level of pain is nonsense. 1 hour ago, Joe in Winslow said: You'd have to be insane to say "yeah, you know what? Go ahead and shoot laser beams at my eyeballs." Hard pass. I may do it. Not 15 years ago...but as I get older, my eyes are getting so much worse that I'm having to start considering the 1 in 1000 chance of LASIK complications against the much higher chance that I'll have to go on disability within the next 10 years. But if I do choose that, I'll be fully cognizant of the risks. Like anything...risk is involved, and you shouldn't blindly (so to speak) assume it's a panacea.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 1, 2019 Posted March 1, 2019 5 hours ago, DC Tom said: You've probably never lived with the level of pain she had to deal with. This isn't eye strain. Imagine having hydrogen peroxide dripped in to your eyes, all day, every day, for the rest of your life. Attributing "rational" reactions to that level of pain is nonsense. I may do it. Not 15 years ago...but as I get older, my eyes are getting so much worse that I'm having to start considering the 1 in 1000 chance of LASIK complications against the much higher chance that I'll have to go on disability within the next 10 years. But if I do choose that, I'll be fully cognizant of the risks. Like anything...risk is involved, and you shouldn't blindly (so to speak) assume it's a panacea. Read too many books? Or hereditary?
plenzmd1 Posted March 1, 2019 Posted March 1, 2019 (edited) 7 hours ago, DC Tom said: You've probably never lived with the level of pain she had to deal with. This isn't eye strain. Imagine having hydrogen peroxide dripped in to your eyes, all day, every day, for the rest of your life. Attributing "rational" reactions to that level of pain is nonsense. 1 Maybe not,.. but most likely yes I lived twenty years of my life with much worse pain prolly. For about 5 months a year from 89-08, i would get cluster headaches. Also known as suicide headaches because people actually do commit suicide due to the pain. No medication for them back then, you just knew this poker going through your eye was coming, and their was nothing you could do about it Nothing worse than your little kids being scared poopless cause daddy is in the hallway banging his head on the floor trying to somehow relieve the pain( and that is a common response..why? no one .knows) And that would be everyday, sometimes 4 rimes a day during bad clusters...where for 8-12 weeks at a time if my eye didnt feel like it was getting stabbed, my head hurt so bad from the residual pain felt like my whole head was in a vice. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/11/cluster-headaches-the-worst-possible-pain/281524/ if you really want to read a sad message board, go here https://clusterbusters.org/forums/forum/4-general-board/ Never once thought of killing myself over it, especially when little ones started coming. I aint buying thhis lady killed herself over pain and Lasik...there were deeper issues there. Edited March 1, 2019 by plenzmd1
mead107 Posted March 1, 2019 Posted March 1, 2019 14 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: Maybe not,.. but most likely yes I lived twenty years of my life with much worse pain prolly. For about 5 months a year from 89-08, i would get cluster headaches. Also known as suicide headaches because people actually do commit suicide due to the pain. No medication for them back then, you just knew this poker going through your eye was coming, and their was nothing you could do about it Nothing worse than your little kids being scared poopless cause daddy is in the hallway banding his head on the floor trying to somehow relieve the pain( and that is a common response..why? no one .knows) And that would be everyday, sometimes 4 rimes a day during bad clusters...where for 8-12 weeks at a time if my eye didnt feel like it was getting stabbed, my head hurt so bad from the residual pain felt like my whole head was in a vice. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/11/cluster-headaches-the-worst-possible-pain/281524/ Never once thought of killing myself over it, especially when little ones started coming. I aint buying thhis lady killed herself over pain and Lasik...there were deeper issues there. Who slapped you in the back of the head and fixed it for you? Or was your brain ? out growing that small head of yours?????????? 1
plenzmd1 Posted March 1, 2019 Posted March 1, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, mead107 said: Who slapped you in the back of the head and fixed it for you? Or was your brain ? out growing that small head of yours?????????? Only benefit of getting older is that for many of us "the beast" as it is known tends to ga way when we hit 45.Mine last a bit longer, but the last few years were not so bad. And, the only good thing about these things is they tend to occur at the same time every day, so i could plan my sales calls around them Edited March 1, 2019 by plenzmd1 1
GG Posted March 1, 2019 Posted March 1, 2019 If it's a question of vanity, it's far better to wear glasses because it gives you far more options to accessorize.
Recommended Posts