Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, TheBeane said:

 

I get what you're saying, but why does it have to go one way or another?  I still say you go BPA at 9 or trade down or whatever.  If that BPA happens to be an O-lineman, take the kid!  Our O-line needs as much help as it can get. 

 

Giving JA time to throw, and Shady holes to run through will make everyone look better.

 

Because there will almost assuredly be a difference maker at another position of need that won't be a reach at #9. If we were to sign Saffold and Morse - that's going to eat up a HUGE chunk of our cap space. 

 

I'm not saying don't Draft a Lineman at all. I'm just saying using that much cap space on two stud FA Lineman and then the #9 overall is putting too many resources into one place. When this team needs a lot.

Posted

I find it hard to believe that a guy would leave a team with a young coach and quarterback, that just went to the Super Bowl, while living in suburban Los Angeles, just to rewind his career by a few years and move to a team with a young QB and coach that hasn’t smelled the Super Bowl in two decades and live in suburban Buffalo, NY. But....we’ll see!

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

If they go all in and sign Saffold AND Morse (or Paradis) - Round 1 needs to go to skill positions or D-Line. We have other holes than just the O-Line.

We will have the resources to get the other holes upgraded via the rest of the draft.I'm betting the Beane counter spends up to 50 mill from the bank...still leaving us 35 in savings.

Posted
8 minutes ago, 315Mafia said:

IF the Bills could land Rodger Saffold and Matt Paradis, that would go along way towards solidifying the o- line.

then we add Alabama OT Jonah Williams in rd1 and flip Dawkins to right tackle

 

I don’t understand why everyone seems to want to move Dawkins to RT.  The kid played very well at LT when he had a competent LG and C playing next to him.  Taking Jonah Williams (or any other OT) at 9 would be a huge mistake, IMO.

  • Like (+1) 6
Posted

Sign two and draft one high.....we would be looking at a whole new ballgame! This is exciting and can’t happen soon enough! 

Posted
39 minutes ago, Nihilarian said:

One reason Saffold looked so good was that he had a solid LT next to him in Andrew Whitworth, who just decided he would play another year. Surprising really because of Rams center John Sullivan played so poorly in the second half of last year.  Kind of interesting that all five Rams linemen played in all 16 games.

 

Anyway, he would be a huge upgrade over what Buffalo now has at LG. Not really at Richie Incognito's level but at 6'5'' 323lbs he should hold his own. Only one hold penalty last year, 4 false starts. 

 

 

Saffold would be a huge help to Dawkins’ development on the left side

Posted
Just now, Johnny Hammersticks said:

 

I don’t understand why everyone seems to want to move Dawkins to RT.  The kid played very well at LT when he had a competent LG and C playing next to him.  Taking Jonah Williams (or any other OT) at 9 would be a huge mistake, IMO.

 

Didn’t Dawkins also struggle when they tried to put him on the right side early? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Yes please

I'm a little more hesitant than you are. If I'm going to overspend I would rather do it for a younger player. As it stands he is in a good situation in LA from location, team and coaching standpoint.  Obviously, we can pay more but I think he will stay in tinsel town. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Johnny Hammersticks said:

 

I don’t understand why everyone seems to want to move Dawkins to RT.  The kid played very well at LT when he had a competent LG and C playing next to him.  Taking Jonah Williams (or any other OT) at 9 would be a huge mistake, IMO.

I think they talk themselves into Cajuste. I’d hate that less than Jonah but blehh. It’s a need pick. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, GG said:

Surprised no one asked if Kromer is also coming with him?

Exactly what I was thinking...lol

 

Get rid of all the lawn chairs and bring him in!

Posted
14 minutes ago, JohnC said:

I'm a little more hesitant than you are. If I'm going to overspend I would rather do it for a younger player. As it stands he is in a good situation in LA from location, team and coaching standpoint.  Obviously, we can pay more but I think he will stay in tinsel town. 

 

Agreed

Posted
23 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Because there will almost assuredly be a difference maker at another position of need that won't be a reach at #9. If we were to sign Saffold and Morse - that's going to eat up a HUGE chunk of our cap space. 

 

I'm not saying don't Draft a Lineman at all. I'm just saying using that much cap space on two stud FA Lineman and then the #9 overall is putting too many resources into one place. When this team needs a lot.

 

Yes and no....  Saffold and Morse/Paradis will certainly cost a nice chunk of change.  However the rookie drafted at #9 overall, no matter the position, is going to cost only approx $3.5M towards the cap in 2019.  Not a huge cap it.

 

Now if you are talking Cap space and draft capital combined as a measuring stick, that would def. be a lot into 1 position group.  However I once again would make the argument that the O-Line needs that kind of attention.

Posted
29 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I find it hard to believe that a guy would leave a team with a young coach and quarterback, that just went to the Super Bowl, while living in suburban Los Angeles, just to rewind his career by a few years and move to a team with a young QB and coach that hasn’t smelled the Super Bowl in two decades and live in suburban Buffalo, NY. But....we’ll see!

 

I thought the above during every single post I read in this thread.

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...