Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 5/20/2019 at 1:09 PM, Koko78 said:

 

Yeah, that whole 'lack of proof' thing is a real B word, isn't it?

Expand  

Lack of proof? There is no lack of proof. He obviously obstructed justice. Even Republicans are admitting this now. He obviously was involved in a hush money payment to a porn actress. Ya, he's a criminal. We are only seeing more and more evidence as the cover ups unravel. 

Posted
  On 5/20/2019 at 1:12 PM, Tiberius said:

 

Expand  

 

Ah yes, it's so "obvious" that there doesn't need to be proof, right? Clearly he "obstructed" the investigation into a fabricated "offense" by protesting his innocence. How dare he! He should be immediately impeached and a trial scheduled before the Senate.

Posted
  On 5/20/2019 at 1:12 PM, Tiberius said:

Lack of proof? There is no lack of proof. He obviously obstructed justice. Even Republicans are admitting this now. He obviously was involved in a hush money payment to a porn actress. Ya, he's a criminal. We are only seeing more and more evidence as the cover ups unravel. 

Expand  

HAHA Gator, you ignorant slut. He paid a ***** to keep her mouth shut, not to open it.

Posted
  On 5/20/2019 at 1:34 PM, Koko78 said:

 

Ah yes, it's so "obvious" that there doesn't need to be proof, right? Clearly he "obstructed" the investigation into a fabricated "offense" by protesting his innocence. How dare he! He should be immediately impeached and a trial scheduled before the Senate.

Expand  

No, he actually obstructed justice. He is protected by the political bias of people like you who think he should be above the law. 

Posted
  On 5/20/2019 at 1:40 PM, 3rdnlng said:

HAHA Gator, you ignorant slut. He paid a ***** to keep her mouth shut, not to open it.

Expand  

 

The really funny part is that she wound up paying HIM in the end.

  • Haha (+1) 4
Posted

Yup, just another criminal investigation with witness giving testimony, foreign money, convictions already and boy, Trump better win in 2020 or he might seriously go to jail

 

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/cnn-sdny-trump-inaugural-probe

  On 5/15/2019 at 12:10 PM, SoCal Deek said:

Since these are co-equal branches of government I’d like to know when it’s the President’s turn to start calling members of Congress into his office for public shamings (hearings). That ought to be must see TV!

Expand  

Talk to Mitch McConnel, you do realize GOP controls the senate, right? 

Posted
  On 5/20/2019 at 7:52 PM, Tiberius said:

Yup, just another criminal investigation with witness giving testimony, foreign money, convictions already and boy, Trump better win in 2020 or he might seriously go to jail

 

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/cnn-sdny-trump-inaugural-probe

Talk to Mitch McConnel, you do realize GOP controls the senate, right? 

Expand  

lol. you do realize quite a number of your boys are going to jail, right?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 5/15/2019 at 12:10 PM, SoCal Deek said:

Since these are co-equal branches of government I’d like to know when it’s the President’s turn to start calling members of Congress into his office for public shamings (hearings). That ought to be must see TV!

Expand  

House wins court battle over Trumps financial records. Because, of course congress can investigate the president. 

Posted
  On 5/21/2019 at 10:36 AM, Tiberius said:

It will be interesting if the conservatives on the Supreme Court rule this president is above the law. 

 

What next? Elections are unconstitutional? 

Expand  

above the law? understand what you are advocating for here - the ability of the state to obtain your private financial information to be used in any way they see fit. also, do you not understand that we are talking about the IRS here and if anything, anything was untoward with his taxes, he would be audited and then if anything were found to be out of order, he would face legal consequences, right? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 5/21/2019 at 10:40 AM, Foxx said:

above the law? understand what you are advocating for here - the ability of the state to obtain your private financial information to be used in any way they see fit. also, do you not understand that we are talking about the IRS here and if anything, anything was untoward with his taxes, he would be audited and then if anything were found to be out of order, he would face legal consequences, right? 

Expand  

I find it telling that a judge ruled the House could subpoena on a whim, and yet a member of his own branch of government needs probable cause and a warrant to get this same type of information. If there really is all this supposed evidence against Trump, then why don't they just follow legal precedent and swear out a warrant?

Point is, the House is acting as if THEY are the superior branch of government... The true definition of Tyranny.. Where does it stop? Is Nadler going to next issue a no knock raid of Trump Tower? Or maybe even the White House?

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
  On 5/21/2019 at 10:40 AM, Foxx said:

above the law? understand what you are advocating for here - the ability of the state to obtain your private financial information to be used in any way they see fit. also, do you not understand that we are talking about the IRS here and if anything, anything was untoward with his taxes, he would be audited and then if anything were found to be out of order, he would face legal consequences, right? 

Expand  

Tons of precedent for investigations. Hundreds of years of it. If this President has ties to a foreign power the American people have a right to know. That's all. 

×
×
  • Create New...