Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, thebandit27 said:

 

Cute.

 

How many did he have the previous year?

 

Without looking...

 

And you still missed the point: he averaged 3 receptions per game. Why?

 

I get that some of you are crushing HARD, but honestly, it's okay to ask why he didn't produce.

I am right there with you being wary of his low production.  He was the WR2 on his team behind AJ Brown who out-produced him considerably.  For that matter so did Demarcus Lodge on his own team.

 

AJ Brown averaged 7 receptions per game in comparison to Metcalf’s 3 and Lodge averaged 4 per game.

 

Metcalf is clearly a tremendous athlete with incredible size and strength, but why was he not more productive?

Posted

I don't see Metcalf lasting until 9.  Even if he does, I'm not sure Bills take him.  As of right now, the Bills have at least 4 glaring holes all of them starting spots - Center, Right Guard, Right Tackle, and DT to replace Kyle.  I'm guessing Long is starting Left Guard.  I'm expecting Bills to be active in free agency but they also need some immediate starters via the draft.  Probably three starters.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Troll Toll said:

There’s a good number of receivers I like for the Bills:

 

1. AJ Brown

2. DK Metcalf 

3. Hakeem Butler

4. Parris Campbell

5. Andy Isabella

 

I like all these guys too, but I would also add N'keal Harry in there near top.  I am also tempted to move down still to get extra picks given the depth at WR, but loving the idea of Metcalf at #9 still.

 

1. D.K. Metcalf

2. N'Keal Harry 

3. AJ Brown

4. Hakeem Butler

5. Parris Campbell

6. Andy Isabella

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, BillsFan1988 said:

Me2 the prb is he won't be there the latest he goes is in the 3rd somewhere.

 

I think his size and position (slot) will push him past the 3rd, but who really knows anything about what teams are thinking?

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Not at the table Karlos said:

Isabella ran a 4.31?

He’s only 186 lbs... that’s a good time but he’s small. Campbell ran the same and he’s 200+. Just some context, they are both good prospects . Then there is the freak who ran nearly the same and he’s almost 40 lbs heavier. Craziness 

Edited by YoloinOhio
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

The one player that REALLY disappointed me was Hakeem Butler.  It looked as if he didn’t have a clue imo.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

He’s only 186 lbs... that’s a good time but he’s small. Campbell ran the same and he’s 200+. Just some context, they are both good prospects . Then there is the freak who ran nearly the same and he’s almost 40 lbs heavier. Craziness 

Yeah hes small. My confusion came from the laser issue. I think he was listed as a 4.56 live. Now its down to a 4.27

Posted
7 minutes ago, Not at the table Karlos said:

Yeah hes small. My confusion came from the laser issue. I think he was listed as a 4.56 live. Now its down to a 4.27

Oh I see I didn’t see it live 

Posted
9 hours ago, SWATeam said:

He's a unique talent, for sure.  Love how physical he is.  Really has some nasty in him, loves to mix it up blocking.  I don't think he has the best hands though.

 

I didn't see all his games but his hands looked solid to me.

 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Metcalf is the one who compares to Megatron and is drawing those comparisons.

 

Butler is more lumbering with his long stride and drops too many passes.  I’m worried a bit about Butler, more i read on him the more he sounds like James Hardy did coming out of college.  

 

Ill still I’ll be stoked if we got him in 2nd, but just some deja vu when I read about it him.

 

 

Hardy wishes he was that good.

 

I wouldn't say lumbering, hes along strider but is fast. Kind of like Allen who doesnt look like hes running fast but the next thing you know he sails right by.

 

 

Posted

I think the Bills have a spot now at #9 to trade with Oakland for #24 & #27.

 

Metcalf great, got it.... dude has a neck injury. Never really show cased his full potential cause he wasn’t on the field. A career 67 catches or something like that and he’s worth the#9 pick? I’m not buying it. He hasn’t proved to be equal Julio Jones.

 

Trade back, grab 24 Fant, 27 Risner and 40 Deebo Samuels.

  • Like (+1) 9
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

 

Hardy wishes he was that good.

 

I wouldn't say lumbering, hes along strider but is fast. Kind of like Allen who doesnt look like hes running fast but the next thing you know he sails right by.

 

 

 

I wasn't making a comparison, I have said many times I like Butler.  Just said the notes on him sound similar, so I wanted to see how he did at the combine to make sure some of those issues weren't as prevalent.  He is intriguing, have nothing against him.  One comment got taken a bit out of context here in this thread, but I am on the record of being a fan of Butler in the 2nd

Posted
35 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

He’s only 186 lbs... that’s a good time but he’s small. Campbell ran the same and he’s 200+. Just some context, they are both good prospects . Then there is the freak who ran nearly the same and he’s almost 40 lbs heavier. Craziness 

You just have to insert Parris into every post, dont you!?

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...