Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

35 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

 

I just added a link to a Bills combine meeting tracker to the OP

 

Thanks for all your updates..

 

Anyone still think Ridley will still be there at Pick 74?

 

Expecting them to go DL OL with picks 1 and 2 so if no trade downs then Riley could be one of the better WR’s that might still be there in the third..

 

 

Edited by Aussie Joe
Posted
1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

 

Agreed John. He has the highest ceiling of any offensive player in the draft. He's boom or bust with all the potential in the world, and that seems to fit what this regime looks for.

FWIW, I heard today( from Bucky Brooks, I think) that although his body fat was a ridiculous 1.6, that he may be prone to cramps and muscle strains, i.e. hamstrings especially, on a regular basis. And especially in a cold weather town as is Buffalo. I never thought about that, but that may be a legit concern. I'm sure glad my job doesn't hang in the balance due to a wide variety of issues like McBeane has to filter through!

Posted
10 minutes ago, BuffAlone said:

FWIW, I heard today( from Bucky Brooks, I think) that although his body fat was a ridiculous 1.6, that he may be prone to cramps and muscle strains, i.e. hamstrings especially, on a regular basis. And especially in a cold weather town as is Buffalo. I never thought about that, but that may be a legit concern. I'm sure glad my job doesn't hang in the balance due to a wide variety of issues like McBeane has to filter through!

Just tell him to go out and have some Buffalo wings once in a while LOL

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
On 2/28/2019 at 9:13 AM, Stank_Nasty said:

228 for metcalf…. seems like that photo was just a good angle and pump after all. probably put on a good 5-10 of lean mass from the regular season. reasonable...wheres all the people that were sure Metcalf was juicing out like david boston? @Alphadawg7, wasn't it you and I trying to explain to @Yav how silly it was to just blame the juice?

Nope, still think the kids on something. It’s been talked about with a lot of Ol Miss players.

 

N’Keal Harry just marched himon the bench with 27 reps and came in at 228 pounds. I’m telling you Harry has YAC ability and will win the contested balls. Don’t sleep on the beast out of ASU. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, TigerJ said:

Just tell him to go out and have some Buffalo wings once in a while LOL

Yeah, they are just "wings" in Buffalo.

And for crying out loud, Bleu Cheese or Move Please!

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

 

I just added a link to a Bills combine meeting tracker to the OP

Riley Ridley is someone to watch. I don’t think he’ll be there at 40. But he reminds me of Devonte Adams. Trust me I’m a Fresno St Bulldog fan and Georgia fan. I watched them both, a lot. He’d be a good fit, him or Deebo Samuels would be great in this offense.

 

Im sticking with- heavy FA OL.

 

1. Hockenson 

2. Ridley/Deebo

 

a lot of defense rounds 3-7

Posted
4 hours ago, thebandit27 said:

 

No thanks to AJ Brown:

 

#OleMiss WR A.J. Brown said that the key to he and fellow Rebels WR D.K. Metcalf’s body transformations was all in the diet. Said the hardest food he had to give up was wings. “I’m a big wings guy.”

5 replies0 retweets10 likes
Reply
 5
 
Retweet
 
 
 
Like
 10

So does the No thanks apply to Metcalf also?

Posted
9 minutes ago, Clyde Smith said:

So does the No thanks apply to Metcalf also?

Based on McDs comments about the league and #1 WRs I don’t see us using #9 on a WR. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I’m still not on board with Metcalf. Idk why I’m just not feeling him. He had very little production, had injuries and had two other NFL quality WRs to take pressure off yet it still didn’t happen. 

 

I like grabbing WRs like Ridley, Samuel, Isabella, etc later in the draft more then that. He may make me eat my words but I hope he does go before 9. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, 1ZAYDAY1 said:

Based on McDs comments about the league and #1 WRs I don’t see us using #9 on a WR. 

I agree not at 9, but somewhere around 15 in the event of a possible trade down.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
10 hours ago, thebandit27 said:

 

Not to worry. Between Q. Williams, E. Oliver, C. Wilkins, and J. Simmons, one of them will be there at 9, and all have the potential to be utter wrecking balls on the interior.

That is a fine list that will yield at least one of them available at the Bills' pick.  I think that Wilkins is underrated here and seems like an ideal Bean-McDermott profile fit.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, Clyde Smith said:

So does the No thanks apply to Metcalf also?

 

In all seriousness, I'm not very big on DK at 9. Just too little productivity for the talent level.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...