Jump to content

Robert Kraft charged in prostitution ring bust ( Update: Kraft legal team accused of lying in court)


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Keukasmallies said:

So, Robert-that-ain't-me-on-that-video Kraft has pled not guilty to the hot mess he created by frequenting the "massage" store front in Jupiter, FL.  That plea makes more sense on the planet Jupiter.  [Hand + Cookie Jar = Busted]  He might have some problems wriggling out of this one.  When all is said and done, a deflated football will look mighty good.

 

 

Dude.  Where did Kraft day he wasn’t on a video?  

Posted
On ‎2‎/‎27‎/‎2019 at 1:31 PM, Alphadawg7 said:

 

I would but it would probably prove my estimate of half the board way low haha

 

 

Well Shady said he isn't part of the population so we can remove him  from the count?   Lol

Posted
On 2/27/2019 at 12:00 PM, Augie said:

 

I think it’s important to paint the entire picture, and that would have to include the chauffeured Bentley. 

 

 

I wonder if the driver is embarrassed or amused by this??? I guess it depends upon what he really thinks of Kraft....

 

And whether he made an anonymous call to police about it but what he should have done  was contact TMZ about a hot tip and find how much they would have paid for it.

Posted
9 minutes ago, prissythecat said:

 

 

Dude.  Where did Kraft day he wasn’t on a video?  

If you categorically deny the charge of sex in a massage parlor when the police say they have two videos of it you are denying it. technical, and of course the lawyer is going to say this, but it is still a denial.

 

Put it this way, he is NOT saying that he went in there for 14 minutes, sweet-talked a 58-year-old woman to have consensual, non-hooker sex with him and then go on a date.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said:

If you categorically deny the charge of sex in a massage parlor when the police say they have two videos of it you are denying it. technical, and of course the lawyer is going to say this, but it is still a denial.

 

Put it this way, he is NOT saying that he went in there for 14 minutes, sweet-talked a 58-year-old woman to have consensual, non-hooker sex with him and then go on a date.

He denied he did anythng illegal. Is having sex illegal now?

Posted
2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Is he trying to get the video thrown out, or trying to say it was consensual?

 

Those two aren't mutually exclusive.    But maybe some of our legal experts should chime in.     It sounds like the Jupiter police had a 5 cent legal counsel and are coming to the table with a case that has so many holes any competent defense lawyer would be able to pick low hanging fruit to get Kraft out.

Posted
7 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

He denied he did anythng illegal. Is having sex illegal now?

So you're saying it was consensual sex between two adults who met, chatted, courted each other, grew fond of each other enough to have consensual sex and finished in 14 minutes?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said:

So you're saying it was consensual sex between two adults who met, chatted, courted each other, grew fond of each other enough to have consensual sex and finished in 14 minutes?

well, is that illegal? As mentioned, he never claimed not to have sex in the massage spa, or that the video could not have been him. He claimed he was not involved in illegal activity. Having consensual sex in a closed off room is not illegal.

 

And yes, this could happen to me all the time with my stunningly handsome looks!!!?

Posted
14 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said:

So you're saying it was consensual sex between two adults who met, chatted, courted each other, grew fond of each other enough to have consensual sex and finished in 14 minutes?

 

Lots of romance is done in under a minute I believe.   14 minutes is impressive

Posted
1 hour ago, Chris66 said:

Just read the article. With Krafts money I dont think this goes anywhere. Especially where the woman were of age and ran the place.

the woman can be 100 years old 

 

prostitution is prostitution

44 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Is he trying to get the video thrown out, or trying to say it was consensual?

this isn't Roger ...

 

They won't Destroy All The Video Evidence 

Posted
41 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

well, is that illegal? As mentioned, he never claimed not to have sex in the massage spa, or that the video could not have been him. He claimed he was not involved in illegal activity. Having consensual sex in a closed off room is not illegal.

 

And yes, this could happen to me all the time with my stunningly handsome looks!!!?

That's the point. It's 100% impossible to believe that it was not prostitution and that he knew it was prostitution because it was NOT a date.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said:

That's the point. It's 100% impossible to believe that it was not prostitution and that he knew it was prostitution because it was NOT a date.

unlikey yes..impossible no. Porn movies show me all the time strangers hook up in less time.

 

Seriously, it's going to be hard to prove it was non-consensual without audio....plain and simple. He pays for a message, they are instanly attracted to each other, they have sex, she says mom needs money in China... he leaves her a hundo to send to the homeland to help her mother...

 

with no audio saying otherwise..prove it didn't happen that way?

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

unlikey yes..impossible no. Porn movies show me all the time strangers hook up in less time.

 

Seriously, it's going to be hard to prove it was non-consensual without audio....plain and simple. He pays for a message, they are instanly attracted to each other, they have sex, she says mom needs money in China... he leaves her a hundo to send to the homeland to help her mother...

 

with no audio saying otherwise..prove it didn't happen that way?

 

 

Without the audio of an offer and an acceptance of the offer (sex for money/money for sex), not sure how they prove he solicited.

 

Maybe he's like Trump, just a big tip...

Edited by Mr. WEO
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

unlikey yes..impossible no. Porn movies show me all the time strangers hook up in less time.

 

Seriously, it's going to be hard to prove it was non-consensual without audio....plain and simple. He pays for a message, they are instanly attracted to each other, they have sex, she says mom needs money in China... he leaves her a hundo to send to the homeland to help her mother...

 

with no audio saying otherwise..prove it didn't happen that way?

All I would have to prove is that I have working synapses in my brain. That is proof.

  • Like (+1) 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...