Koko78 Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 49 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Because I challenge your eating habits? Absolutely brilliant retort. <lowers the cone of silence. C'mon man, the patented "double dumbass pork chop on you" retort is a staple of his repertoire. 47 minutes ago, row_33 said: to liberal thinking, if a conservative idea isn't guaranteed 100% perfect, then it's useless, and it's never going to be seen as positive anyways and for their own liberal ideas they accept anything they can dream up, never bothering to foresee the obvious negatives that show up 100% guaranteed Liberals see liberal ideas that aren't more than10% guaranteed to work as being necessary to pass anyhow (so that we can know what those ideas are), then fixed over the next few decades through subsequent legislation. Think of the children! People are actually literally going to die!!!!111 Conservative ideas are evil, immoral, unworthy of mention, and must be opposed at all costs.
row_33 Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 14 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Liberals see liberal ideas that aren't more than10% guaranteed to work as being necessary to pass anyhow (so that we can know what those ideas are), then fixed over the next few decades through subsequent legislation. Think of the children! People are actually literally going to die!!!!111 Conservative ideas are evil, immoral, unworthy of mention, and must be opposed at all costs. for war liberals and their media toadies demand you present perfect details on how many will die and how long it will take, and start complaining right at that moment that the whole thing is a fiasco
Foxx Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 52 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Spending money appropriated for something else please excuse my ignorance here. can you kindly quote me which part of the Constitution expressly prohibits this? TYIA 50 minutes ago, B-Man said: Please Foxx........................just don't ... lol. sorry. 1
row_33 Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 12 minutes ago, Foxx said: please excuse my ignorance here. can you kindly quote me which part of the Constitution expressly prohibits this? TYIA lol. sorry. you can't even get Tibs to realize you are calling his bluff
Foxx Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 1 minute ago, row_33 said: you can't even get Tibs to realize you are calling his bluff shush you.
BeginnersMind Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 Trump opened his national emergency press conference talking about China. Then North Korea. Japan. UK. Opioid crisis and China’s role. Also the Dow and jobs. And threw in a few words about the wall. Nice “emergency.” Imagine if George Bush had opened his 9-11 press conference talking about inflation. Congress could have passed this but didn’t. The presidential overreach continues. I’ll be curious if the Senate has the cajones to close off the purse strings for this grab. Some Rs will oppose this recognizing this as POTUS overreach.
boyst Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 3 hours ago, The_Dude said: Id wager a weeks salary that Tasker is an incel who’s never smashed. I'd wager youre right. Tasker is a little B word. I own that slob. 1
Numark3 Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 I'm more upset about some of these burger preferences I have read than anything else discussed in this thread 1
DC Tom Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 1 hour ago, BeginnersMind said: Trump opened his national emergency press conference talking about China. Then North Korea. Japan. UK. Opioid crisis and China’s role. Also the Dow and jobs. And threw in a few words about the wall. Nice “emergency.” Imagine if George Bush had opened his 9-11 press conference talking about inflation. Congress could have passed this but didn’t. The presidential overreach continues. I’ll be curious if the Senate has the cajones to close off the purse strings for this grab. Some Rs will oppose this recognizing this as POTUS overreach. On the one hand...presidential overreach. On the other hand...Trump has a pen. And a phone. Suck it, Democrats.
BeginnersMind Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 22 minutes ago, DC Tom said: On the one hand...presidential overreach. On the other hand...Trump has a pen. And a phone. Suck it, Democrats. Both hands America loses.
grinreaper Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 Many people here are claiming that the majority of drugs and trafficked humans are found at the ports of entry rather than unprotected border areas. Thank you for making the case for border fences. Border fences are designed to force the people involved in drug/human smuggling to ply their trade at ports of entry. Just because more contraband is found at ports of entry does not mean that less contraband is coming across the border in unprotected areas. It means that it is easier to find drugs at ports of entry than in unprotected areas. So, who can argue the importance of forcing evil doers to come through out ports of entry?
DC Tom Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 1 minute ago, BeginnersMind said: Both hands America loses. Just remember: no matter how bad it gets, Hillary's still not president. 1 1 1
grinreaper Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 4 hours ago, Foxx said: did he issue a NE to do so? Where was the appropriation?
B-Man Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 (edited) I didn’t want Obamacare underwritten by Obama alone. He did it anyway. . . . . .Trump undid it. I didn’t want Iran to get a pallet of cash, but Obama did it anyway. . . . . . Trump reversed that. Obama’s already done what Trump’s discussing. “What if a D wins” is moot. They’ve already done it. . THAT’S DIFFERENT BECAUSE SHUT UP: I’m Old Enough to Remember When Democrats Loved Unilateral Executive Actions on Immigration. . Edited February 16, 2019 by B-Man 2
row_33 Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 31 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Just remember: no matter how bad it gets, Hillary's still not president. Suck it Dems
HamSandwhich Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: Call me when that happens because it won't. Immigrants make us better, create jobs and help businesses thrive and make goods and services cheaper. You guys acting like you you want to save lives is funny. Gun control, expanded health care and expanded public health campaigns would save a whole lot more lives, but the GOP is lock stock and barrel against any of that, so I think you are being a hypocrite and no one believes you. Hence, the 40 seat drubbing you guys took in the last election You're a complete moron. Go ahead and become socialist and we will become Venezuela. It will seem so sweet at first, everyone gets everything free! Tax the 1%, then when they become the 20% then the 20% will be the richest and they'll get taxed to heck, then when they become the 40%...well you get the picture, everyone becomes equally poor. Then we'll have to print money to try and make ends meet, and boom, we are in inflation hell, lines out the door, and not enough food to go around. Uprising by the people, then the big communist hand comes down to squash the rebellion with an iron clenched fist. That is always how it ends. You're witnessing it in Venezuela, wait for the crack down, you'll see. You idiots who want to ruin the country. Edited February 16, 2019 by HamSandwhich 3
RaoulDuke79 Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 (edited) 9 hours ago, Tiberius said: Chamber of Commerce chimes in on this authoritarian power grab: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/430184-us-chamber-says-trump-emergency-declaration-erodes-system-of Hahaha.....He signed the budget. Dems cant accuse him of holding government hostage. What a bunch of do nothing haters. Edited February 16, 2019 by RaoulDuke79
B-Man Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 PERSPECTIVE: . Quote Mark MeadowsVerified account @RepMarkMeadows 2h2 hours ago POTUS' declaration is legal + well founded. To my Democrat colleagues complaining about executive authority: welcome aboard! Good to have you. If you're ready to permanently rein in executive branch power and give it back to Congress, once and for all--I'll work with you. Today. . 1
RaoulDuke79 Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 7 hours ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: I do have to laugh at all of those nincompoops who seem to think that Trump is on "Next Level Thinking" Pelosi and Schumer have his number here. It takes a Joint Resolution to undo the emergency declaration, and if it passes the House on a simple majority (Which the Democrats easily can bring to the floor and win a majority on) the Senate MUST vote on it. McConnell can't hide it like he did all of those other bills to end the shutdown. You've already had a bunch of Republican senators say that they are against the national emergency. You have a bunch, including McConnell, who are facing elections in 2020. There are legitimate worries that being forced on this will cause infighting in the party over an unpopular issue. And you only need four to flip. https://www.businessinsider.com/state-of-the-union-republicans-warn-trump-against-national-emergency-boder-wall-2019-2 In short, you have Trump picking a deeply unpopular and infeasible project as his hill to die on, and he gets to drag down the rest of his party down with him. We'll see how it turns out in 2020. Which one of the morons that the left is turning out will oppose him? The wanna be Native American? The Jussie Smallete opportunist? Each one is more outrageous than the next.
BeginnersMind Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 22 minutes ago, B-Man said: PERSPECTIVE: . . Cute. I wonder how many of those were funding Acts for items that Congress refused to pass the day before. 1
Recommended Posts