dave mcbride Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 Excellent analysis here. https://www.si.com/nfl/2019/02/06/super-bowl-lii-53-film-study-breakdown-patriots-rams-defenses-real-mvp-belichick-goff-mcvay 1
prissythecat Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 Hmmm. The article implies that New England won because they had a great game plan on how to neutralize the Rams offensive strengths and tendencies. Where is the mention of the massive NFL officiating conspiracy? 1
Mr. WEO Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 1 minute ago, prissythecat said: Hmmm. The article implies that New England won because they had a great game plan on how to neutralize the Rams offensive strengths and tendencies. Where is the mention of the massive NFL officiating conspiracy? Oh you won't find it in that article. SI is essentially the NFL's PRAVDA! So....Breer therefore, again essentially, works for the NFL. 1 1
prissythecat Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 5 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: Oh you won't find it in that article. SI is essentially the NFL's PRAVDA! So....Breer therefore, again essentially, works for the NFL. Ahh got it. Good to know what news outlets spew propaganda ;-) 1
JoshAllenHasBigHands Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 Want to know why Warren Sharp and the analytics school of thought is so terrible? Compare his and this breakdown.
dave mcbride Posted February 7, 2019 Author Posted February 7, 2019 23 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said: Want to know why Warren Sharp and the analytics school of thought is so terrible? Compare his and this breakdown. I'm intrigued by what you're implying here. Care to elaborate? (I think I probably agree with you, btw.)
Jrb1979 Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 You guys really need to layoff the fixed agenda. If it was really fixed for the Pats to win all the time wouldn't other owners be upset about it? Keep Billieving what you want.
JoshAllenHasBigHands Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 15 minutes ago, dave mcbride said: I'm intrigued by what you're implying here. Care to elaborate? (I think I probably agree with you, btw.) Well, first, he only analyzed the Rams passing offense. He didn't even touch the running game, which, if you follow the Rams, is the starting point of their entire offense. Then he only really discussed 11 v 22 sets and the percentage success against different defenses. It was just so shallow and cliche. It completely missed the mark. Like most analytic approaches to scouting.
Coach Tuesday Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 Yeah it's Benoit not Breer - Benoit is pretty good at breaking down film. Breer is plugged into the league for news, etc. Brandt offers excellent salary cap and front office-related content due to his time in the Packers organization. MMQB is a great site.
dave mcbride Posted February 7, 2019 Author Posted February 7, 2019 Sorry about the name confusion. Andy-Albert; Breer-Benoit - I confuse them constantly. 1
Mr. WEO Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 1 hour ago, prissythecat said: Ahh got it. Good to know what news outlets spew propaganda ;-) Of course, as everyone here knows......the answer is "all of them!". 34 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said: Well, first, he only analyzed the Rams passing offense. He didn't even touch the running game, which, if you follow the Rams, is the starting point of their entire offense. Then he only really discussed 11 v 22 sets and the percentage success against different defenses. It was just so shallow and cliche. It completely missed the mark. Like most analytic approaches to scouting. There was no film of that from the SB game....
Kelly the Dog Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 27 minutes ago, dave mcbride said: Sorry about the name confusion. Andy-Albert; Breer-Benoit - I confuse them constantly. I do, too. They are both pretty good in relatively thankless jobs. Benoit can put together some good analysis at times. Thanks for the link.
JoshAllenHasBigHands Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 16 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: Of course, as everyone here knows......the answer is "all of them!". There was no film of that from the SB game.... Like, the running game was so bad it was non-existent? Is that what you are getting at?
Mr. WEO Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 6 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said: Like, the running game was so bad it was non-existent? Is that what you are getting at? si 1
blacklabel Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 While it's a good write-up, I do think someone oughta slap Andy Benoit for describing the Pats DL as "meaty." What a weirdo.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 4 hours ago, Mr. WEO said: Oh you won't find it in that article. SI is essentially the NFL's PRAVDA! So....Breer therefore, again essentially, works for the NFL. ...not to worry!...Mueller is on it pronto............. 1
Green Lightning Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 The Pat's D game plan was very good, but hardly new. Six man fronts really just make a running, roll out QB team play from the pocket and make plays. Josh will see that front next year and hopefully, unlike Goff, he will be accurate and decisive and his receivers beat man-to-man. Reading this it further pisses me off that New Orleans got screwed out of this game. Brees would not have been a deer in the headlights like Goff was.
NoHuddleKelly12 Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 4 hours ago, Mr. WEO said: Oh you won't find it in that article. SI is essentially the NFL's PRAVDA! So....Breer therefore, again essentially, works for the NFL. Kudos for your reference to "Pravda"--that's pulling out all the analogy stops, nailed it! 1
Recommended Posts